Active Users:330 Time:09/04/2025 07:50:24 AM
That's what I've always thought as well. Seriana Sedai Send a noteboard - 29/05/2010 10:06:56 PM
And acted with a suddenness indicative of self-preservation.

It doesn't make sense to me that someone would be waiting to kill him in that pantry on the off chance he might be stopping by. It makes much more sense that someone was up to something and sneaking about, ran into Asmodean, didn't want their plans exposed by someone who recognized him or her and took him out.
Reply to message
An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 12:12:50 PM 2577 Views
I hate to say it, as I love this mystery.... - 27/05/2010 03:01:08 PM 1325 Views
Surely, there can never be enough Asmo threads! *NM* - 27/05/2010 04:18:06 PM 720 Views
I have a theory on the killer that doesn't involve Slayer... - 28/05/2010 03:41:23 AM 1127 Views
It's not really obvious... - 28/05/2010 09:08:27 AM 1064 Views
In addition to Etzel's comments - 28/05/2010 09:08:45 PM 976 Views
Far-fetched, IMO - 27/05/2010 04:01:05 PM 1420 Views
very well said *NM* - 27/05/2010 04:19:10 PM 742 Views
I don't want Slayer to be the killer - 27/05/2010 04:33:06 PM 1117 Views
The way you twist things, it certainly seems so! - 27/05/2010 05:07:22 PM 1212 Views
Bah, hogwash! - 27/05/2010 05:17:37 PM 1081 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash! - 27/05/2010 08:14:16 PM 1115 Views
The point is... - 28/05/2010 08:38:49 AM 1157 Views
Yes, but Fain is a far cry from your average non-channeler - 28/05/2010 12:01:44 PM 1200 Views
As is Slayer - 28/05/2010 12:25:07 PM 1063 Views
There is no evidence of this at all - 28/05/2010 12:32:37 PM 1042 Views
Yeah, the evil guys don't manage to harm the good guys - 28/05/2010 12:38:57 PM 1015 Views
so far we've seen Slayer kill a sleeping guy and his wife - 28/05/2010 12:45:14 PM 1035 Views
I disagree. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:50:02 PM 1149 Views
You always twist the quotes to make them say what Jordan didn't intend to say.... - 28/05/2010 02:20:09 PM 1102 Views
I think this is your interpretation - 28/05/2010 02:50:14 PM 1048 Views
Yeah right... - 27/05/2010 08:35:35 PM 1139 Views
See my replies above. *NM* - 28/05/2010 08:40:42 AM 932 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash! - 28/05/2010 08:28:16 AM 930 Views
See my repy to DomA. *NM* - 28/05/2010 08:39:15 AM 901 Views
None of this explains how Slayer had opportunity that others didn't - 27/05/2010 05:12:48 PM 1241 Views
We often see... - 27/05/2010 05:33:19 PM 1106 Views
I just keep coming back to Slayer needs wild explanations while Graendal is more obvious - 27/05/2010 05:52:13 PM 1188 Views
Ok, as we said in the other thread, let's RAFO! *NM* - 27/05/2010 05:57:49 PM 1199 Views
Agreed *NM* - 27/05/2010 06:03:51 PM 667 Views
Indeed - 28/05/2010 08:39:14 AM 1042 Views
Well... - 28/05/2010 10:19:46 AM 1100 Views
Re: Well... - 28/05/2010 12:20:15 PM 1106 Views
I adressed the points regarding the Fain-comparsion above - 28/05/2010 12:35:08 PM 1045 Views
your Slayer theory is ridiculously complex! - 28/05/2010 12:37:08 PM 1093 Views
It just requires to combine some clues from the first 5 books & some common sense - 28/05/2010 12:44:10 PM 1036 Views
common sense? - 28/05/2010 12:51:25 PM 1051 Views
See my posts above. *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:50:56 PM 1069 Views
Re: Well... - 28/05/2010 02:27:40 PM 1209 Views
No... - 28/05/2010 03:04:41 PM 1129 Views
let's try this another way - 28/05/2010 03:14:07 PM 1121 Views
The main problem with Graendal is... - 28/05/2010 05:31:09 PM 1042 Views
Graendal has a pretty significant role in TFoH - 28/05/2010 06:54:39 PM 1054 Views
Re: The main problem with Graendal is... - 28/05/2010 09:20:27 PM 1183 Views
my first thought was it was Sammael or Graendal. Come LoC it was clear to me that it was Graendal. - 28/05/2010 09:44:38 PM 1223 Views
RJ used the expression... - 29/05/2010 08:17:08 AM 1023 Views
be careful ... your stretching far enough you might hurt yourself - 29/05/2010 01:12:29 PM 1128 Views
Re: No... - 28/05/2010 03:38:49 PM 1002 Views
Re: I don't want Slayer to be the killer - 27/05/2010 07:47:40 PM 1080 Views
Couple of questions - 27/05/2010 09:53:05 PM 1104 Views
Be'lal managed to get out NO! - 27/05/2010 10:08:33 PM 956 Views
Hmmm - 27/05/2010 10:27:55 PM 1077 Views
Re: Hmmm - 27/05/2010 10:34:30 PM 970 Views
I don't think you can actually cut BF weaves - 27/05/2010 10:45:34 PM 987 Views
Hmmm I wonder about that. - 27/05/2010 10:58:46 PM 1044 Views
I think it would be impossible for someone to react that quickly - 27/05/2010 11:13:01 PM 1143 Views
We've seen it done. - 28/05/2010 06:32:08 PM 989 Views
Not the same thing - 28/05/2010 07:00:13 PM 970 Views
Re: Couple of questions - 28/05/2010 03:29:29 PM 1136 Views
As said... - 28/05/2010 08:36:28 AM 1083 Views
Of course you do. Trying to deny it is just silly. Everyone knows your bias. *NM* - 27/05/2010 08:43:18 PM 556 Views
No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too - 27/05/2010 09:08:48 PM 1094 Views
Re: No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too - 28/05/2010 08:25:46 AM 1076 Views
But look... - 28/05/2010 09:01:12 AM 1102 Views
if there are clues in TFoH I find it hard to believe that Slayer is involved - 28/05/2010 12:29:40 PM 1001 Views
The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course - 28/05/2010 12:32:13 PM 1064 Views
Re: The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course - 28/05/2010 12:35:22 PM 1069 Views
RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:40:23 PM 1127 Views
Re: RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:52:30 PM 988 Views
Yeah, I know. *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:51:32 PM 1052 Views
??? - 28/05/2010 02:19:17 PM 1036 Views
Of course RJ implied that. You should read his quotes about Asmo! *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:52:32 PM 1059 Views
Here is what RJ said EDIT - 28/05/2010 03:29:19 PM 834 Views
Indeed - 28/05/2010 05:18:35 PM 998 Views
Re: Indeed - 28/05/2010 05:26:38 PM 962 Views
LOL!! - 28/05/2010 03:29:35 PM 803 Views
Too much? - 28/05/2010 05:16:44 PM 1059 Views
Re: Far-fetched, IMO - 02/06/2010 07:34:58 PM 1181 Views
Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? *NM* - 02/06/2010 11:13:04 PM 675 Views
Re: Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? - 19/06/2010 12:59:54 AM 883 Views
Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken - 19/06/2010 03:30:37 AM 1086 Views
Re: Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken - 24/06/2010 09:03:18 AM 1292 Views
The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book - 26/06/2010 02:32:26 PM 798 Views
Re: The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book - 01/07/2010 10:13:53 PM 1216 Views
Re: An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 06:19:18 PM 1013 Views
Re: An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 09:16:21 PM 1024 Views
Lanfear killed Asmo..... - 28/05/2010 05:05:55 AM 981 Views
Doesn't make sense - 28/05/2010 11:09:14 AM 1026 Views
Sorry, Lanfear did it..... - 29/05/2010 03:47:44 AM 957 Views
Death is Moridin "when death took him"; need I say more *NM* - 28/05/2010 10:07:14 AM 677 Views
There is a quote that refutes this... - 28/05/2010 10:22:12 AM 1067 Views
I think I found an RJ quote that kills the Slayer theory - 29/05/2010 01:57:20 PM 971 Views
If Slayer is actually the killer... - 29/05/2010 02:20:32 PM 1047 Views
Please, RJ would do as he always had and immediately RAFOd a question like that - 29/05/2010 02:26:10 PM 1012 Views
Well, I don't think so. - 29/05/2010 02:43:28 PM 1037 Views
yet he never gave an answer like this one - 29/05/2010 02:57:35 PM 1106 Views
Again... - 29/05/2010 03:09:06 PM 1102 Views
Taking things NO - 29/05/2010 03:12:24 PM 1072 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer. - 06/06/2010 05:44:05 AM 908 Views
If Slayer never met Asmo in the books he could not have killed him - 06/06/2010 12:46:40 PM 905 Views
But Slayer could have met Asmo, when he was killed.. *NM* - 06/06/2010 01:06:01 PM 963 Views
Directly contradicts what RJ said "they did not meet in the books" - 06/06/2010 02:51:50 PM 918 Views
Not "before" the murder. *NM* - 06/06/2010 06:03:34 PM 962 Views
Re: Not "before" the murder. *NM* - 06/06/2010 10:25:16 PM 917 Views
He answers the question, if they met "before" the murder. *NM* - 07/06/2010 07:18:50 AM 665 Views
not if it didn't happen in the books - 07/06/2010 12:08:34 PM 854 Views
I'm relieved then... - 07/06/2010 12:13:58 PM 861 Views
it's nearly as simplistic as knowing Graendal did it - 07/06/2010 12:48:42 PM 995 Views
Compilation of the clues I could find on Slayer and Graendal - 29/05/2010 04:26:58 PM 1095 Views
I think Asmo's killer was as surprised as he. - 29/05/2010 09:26:03 PM 1036 Views
That's what I've always thought as well. - 29/05/2010 10:06:56 PM 962 Views
That's always been my theory too - 29/05/2010 10:18:30 PM 1061 Views
*nods* - 29/05/2010 11:23:18 PM 1079 Views
Re: That's always been my theory too - 30/05/2010 07:35:50 AM 994 Views
You know, there's no direct proof suggesting that Asmo's killer was "surprised"..... - 01/06/2010 04:04:56 AM 945 Views
That's why I said "I think" and offered my opinion. - 01/06/2010 09:46:09 PM 995 Views
except the Author said it was a murder of opportunity - 01/06/2010 11:13:14 PM 981 Views
That is simply false. - 02/06/2010 10:00:27 AM 1042 Views
RJ stated it was a murder of opportunity ... I never said "only" - 02/06/2010 11:49:23 AM 1092 Views
Of course, it is false - 02/06/2010 12:13:11 PM 1010 Views
Here are the quotes - 02/06/2010 12:39:29 PM 940 Views
As said, those quotes simply don't support that the murder was basically just an unplanned accident. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:14:29 PM 663 Views
I disagree. It's pretty much black and white that the opportunity/timing is the key factor to - 02/06/2010 02:39:03 PM 869 Views
Actually I like it because it fits Slayer better than Graendal, as pointed out. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:51:24 PM 517 Views
that makes no sense at all *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:53:28 PM 716 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer. - 06/06/2010 05:47:13 AM 1041 Views
Well... - 06/06/2010 10:46:13 AM 1036 Views
Logic - 06/06/2010 02:53:27 PM 993 Views
You're falling into Etzelian logic there... - 06/06/2010 03:25:30 PM 990 Views
I'm just being a smartass *NM* - 06/06/2010 03:36:00 PM 687 Views
It's good that Etzel sticks to his guns - 06/06/2010 04:42:01 PM 1098 Views
OMG, Taim and Mesaana were getting it on in the pantry - 06/06/2010 09:49:57 PM 959 Views
That reminds me... - 19/06/2010 04:46:58 AM 985 Views
That's not anyone's logic, this argument is simply utter nonsense. *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:08:05 PM 1025 Views
just like thinking Slayer was the killer is - 07/06/2010 12:09:34 PM 976 Views
Yeah... - 07/06/2010 12:21:31 PM 1067 Views
thinking the top assassin killed someone when it's been stated over and over - 07/06/2010 12:56:48 PM 1017 Views
Those quotes pretty much show that Graendal is careful... *NM* - 07/06/2010 01:03:26 PM 971 Views
No they show that she is deliberate! - 07/06/2010 01:12:29 PM 1050 Views
That are just semantics - 07/06/2010 01:36:12 PM 1121 Views
and you think it's obvious that Slayer was the premier Shadow assassin prior to WH? - 07/06/2010 02:06:47 PM 1008 Views
As I explained you several times, I can see why RJ thought it is obvious, yes... - 07/06/2010 02:17:01 PM 973 Views
Why wouldn't Graendal head to Caemlyn at that point? - 07/06/2010 02:36:24 PM 1051 Views
And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin? - 07/06/2010 02:54:33 PM 1101 Views
Re: And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin? - 07/06/2010 03:01:14 PM 1062 Views
You should re-read the scene where Moghedien tells Nynaeve about it... - 07/06/2010 03:12:55 PM 1049 Views
That's a different thing than Moghedien saying the plan was canceled - 07/06/2010 03:15:32 PM 1127 Views
That is essentially what Moghedien said. - 07/06/2010 03:33:35 PM 891 Views
um no it's not - 07/06/2010 04:17:04 PM 978 Views
It's told after that... - 07/06/2010 04:46:31 PM 943 Views
No it doesn't. It tells us that Rahvin, just like all the others had a side plan in place - 07/06/2010 04:55:43 PM 1092 Views
Yeah... - 07/06/2010 05:17:59 PM 1021 Views
Funny I feel the same way you do ... - 07/06/2010 05:25:48 PM 1017 Views
Ah, whatever... - 07/06/2010 05:35:22 PM 916 Views
We are on the exact same page - 07/06/2010 05:42:48 PM 989 Views
Re: We are on the exact same page - 07/06/2010 05:52:37 PM 1066 Views
LMAO - 07/06/2010 06:07:16 PM 1449 Views
I promised Etzel long ago... - 19/06/2010 04:49:11 AM 998 Views

Reply to Message