Active Users:1183 Time:22/11/2024 04:34:27 PM
Re: Well... darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 28/05/2010 12:20:15 PM
It's quite telling that Slayer offers to try again killing Rand, though he must be aware that Rand won't still be in a situation like in Far Madding. We also saw Slayer attacking other strong channelers, e.g. Nynaeve. The key is simply timing, surprise and a quick deadly weapon (like a bolt/knife with posion). Since RJ said, that Fain would have managed to kill Asmo in this scene, Slayer as an asssassin could do it even more likely. Besides that, BS said there was a scene in TSR, which was cut from the book, that had told more about Slayer's powers. This might indicate that Slayer is more lethal than you believe. Of course, RJ is very aware of what Slayer can do, thus it's obvious to him.


It's even more telling how he approached the killing. He waited until his mark was asleep in a city where he could not channel. As for his attacking other powerful channelers... aside from proving completely non-lethal, he also attacked Nynaeve by surprise, yet she (while blocked no less) survived with ease.

Fain is a totally different animal so I don't think holding up a comparison there is very accurate. We know Fain has varied and growing powers, the only actual power we know Slayer possesses is his ability to enter TAR. There have been hints that he may have others, but so far he seems like a Warder who can enter TAR at will.

That's absurd. If one of them hires Slayer to kill the strongest channeler on earth in WH, that means after Rand proved that he can take out the strongest Forsaken, they certainly wouldn't think that Slayer can't take the weakest Forsaken Asmo.


Again, they hire Slayer to kill Rand under specific circumstances when the man can't channel!

Again, if Fain would have managed it, then Slayer could do it as well. Asmo wasn't prepared at all to met his killer, had idle thoughts on his mind, a harp in his hands and was then completely surprised and scared to met his killer in this place. If you then hit him with a quick deadly weapon, Asmo has no chance.


You are over reliant on this quote. Just because Fain could do it doesn't mean anything in regards to Slayer.

It was more complex than that.


I disagree. I think you've made this whole scene needlessly complex. RJ's surprise at the fan reactions speaks volumes to me. It's clear that he had no intention of making this a larger plot driver, he just needed to clear Asmo out of the way, so he did it as practically an afterthought! Creating an elaborate back story makes no sense.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 12:12:50 PM 2510 Views
I hate to say it, as I love this mystery.... - 27/05/2010 03:01:08 PM 1249 Views
Surely, there can never be enough Asmo threads! *NM* - 27/05/2010 04:18:06 PM 693 Views
I have a theory on the killer that doesn't involve Slayer... - 28/05/2010 03:41:23 AM 1059 Views
It's not really obvious... - 28/05/2010 09:08:27 AM 989 Views
In addition to Etzel's comments - 28/05/2010 09:08:45 PM 902 Views
Far-fetched, IMO - 27/05/2010 04:01:05 PM 1359 Views
very well said *NM* - 27/05/2010 04:19:10 PM 712 Views
I don't want Slayer to be the killer - 27/05/2010 04:33:06 PM 1040 Views
The way you twist things, it certainly seems so! - 27/05/2010 05:07:22 PM 1128 Views
Bah, hogwash! - 27/05/2010 05:17:37 PM 1005 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash! - 27/05/2010 08:14:16 PM 1073 Views
The point is... - 28/05/2010 08:38:49 AM 1069 Views
Yes, but Fain is a far cry from your average non-channeler - 28/05/2010 12:01:44 PM 1122 Views
As is Slayer - 28/05/2010 12:25:07 PM 994 Views
There is no evidence of this at all - 28/05/2010 12:32:37 PM 976 Views
Yeah, the evil guys don't manage to harm the good guys - 28/05/2010 12:38:57 PM 939 Views
so far we've seen Slayer kill a sleeping guy and his wife - 28/05/2010 12:45:14 PM 954 Views
I disagree. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:50:02 PM 1075 Views
You always twist the quotes to make them say what Jordan didn't intend to say.... - 28/05/2010 02:20:09 PM 1029 Views
I think this is your interpretation - 28/05/2010 02:50:14 PM 981 Views
Yeah right... - 27/05/2010 08:35:35 PM 1096 Views
See my replies above. *NM* - 28/05/2010 08:40:42 AM 879 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash! - 28/05/2010 08:28:16 AM 849 Views
See my repy to DomA. *NM* - 28/05/2010 08:39:15 AM 841 Views
None of this explains how Slayer had opportunity that others didn't - 27/05/2010 05:12:48 PM 1165 Views
We often see... - 27/05/2010 05:33:19 PM 1035 Views
I just keep coming back to Slayer needs wild explanations while Graendal is more obvious - 27/05/2010 05:52:13 PM 1122 Views
Ok, as we said in the other thread, let's RAFO! *NM* - 27/05/2010 05:57:49 PM 1126 Views
Agreed *NM* - 27/05/2010 06:03:51 PM 635 Views
Indeed - 28/05/2010 08:39:14 AM 972 Views
Well... - 28/05/2010 10:19:46 AM 1023 Views
Re: Well... - 28/05/2010 12:20:15 PM 1028 Views
I adressed the points regarding the Fain-comparsion above - 28/05/2010 12:35:08 PM 972 Views
your Slayer theory is ridiculously complex! - 28/05/2010 12:37:08 PM 1012 Views
It just requires to combine some clues from the first 5 books & some common sense - 28/05/2010 12:44:10 PM 963 Views
common sense? - 28/05/2010 12:51:25 PM 980 Views
See my posts above. *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:50:56 PM 1002 Views
Re: Well... - 28/05/2010 02:27:40 PM 1140 Views
No... - 28/05/2010 03:04:41 PM 1060 Views
let's try this another way - 28/05/2010 03:14:07 PM 1050 Views
The main problem with Graendal is... - 28/05/2010 05:31:09 PM 976 Views
Graendal has a pretty significant role in TFoH - 28/05/2010 06:54:39 PM 1007 Views
Re: The main problem with Graendal is... - 28/05/2010 09:20:27 PM 1114 Views
my first thought was it was Sammael or Graendal. Come LoC it was clear to me that it was Graendal. - 28/05/2010 09:44:38 PM 1146 Views
RJ used the expression... - 29/05/2010 08:17:08 AM 953 Views
be careful ... your stretching far enough you might hurt yourself - 29/05/2010 01:12:29 PM 1063 Views
Re: No... - 28/05/2010 03:38:49 PM 933 Views
Re: I don't want Slayer to be the killer - 27/05/2010 07:47:40 PM 993 Views
Couple of questions - 27/05/2010 09:53:05 PM 1018 Views
Be'lal managed to get out NO! - 27/05/2010 10:08:33 PM 885 Views
Hmmm - 27/05/2010 10:27:55 PM 1003 Views
Re: Hmmm - 27/05/2010 10:34:30 PM 901 Views
I don't think you can actually cut BF weaves - 27/05/2010 10:45:34 PM 905 Views
Hmmm I wonder about that. - 27/05/2010 10:58:46 PM 985 Views
I think it would be impossible for someone to react that quickly - 27/05/2010 11:13:01 PM 1067 Views
We've seen it done. - 28/05/2010 06:32:08 PM 924 Views
Not the same thing - 28/05/2010 07:00:13 PM 902 Views
Re: Couple of questions - 28/05/2010 03:29:29 PM 1066 Views
As said... - 28/05/2010 08:36:28 AM 1003 Views
Of course you do. Trying to deny it is just silly. Everyone knows your bias. *NM* - 27/05/2010 08:43:18 PM 530 Views
No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too - 27/05/2010 09:08:48 PM 1025 Views
Re: No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too - 28/05/2010 08:25:46 AM 998 Views
But look... - 28/05/2010 09:01:12 AM 1032 Views
if there are clues in TFoH I find it hard to believe that Slayer is involved - 28/05/2010 12:29:40 PM 939 Views
The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course - 28/05/2010 12:32:13 PM 987 Views
Re: The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course - 28/05/2010 12:35:22 PM 1002 Views
RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:40:23 PM 1059 Views
Re: RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:52:30 PM 916 Views
Yeah, I know. *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:51:32 PM 982 Views
??? - 28/05/2010 02:19:17 PM 969 Views
Of course RJ implied that. You should read his quotes about Asmo! *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:52:32 PM 986 Views
Here is what RJ said EDIT - 28/05/2010 03:29:19 PM 774 Views
Indeed - 28/05/2010 05:18:35 PM 935 Views
Re: Indeed - 28/05/2010 05:26:38 PM 886 Views
LOL!! - 28/05/2010 03:29:35 PM 734 Views
Too much? - 28/05/2010 05:16:44 PM 998 Views
Re: Far-fetched, IMO - 02/06/2010 07:34:58 PM 1105 Views
Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? *NM* - 02/06/2010 11:13:04 PM 649 Views
Re: Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? - 19/06/2010 12:59:54 AM 807 Views
Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken - 19/06/2010 03:30:37 AM 1016 Views
Re: Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken - 24/06/2010 09:03:18 AM 1211 Views
The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book - 26/06/2010 02:32:26 PM 714 Views
Re: The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book - 01/07/2010 10:13:53 PM 1156 Views
Re: An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 06:19:18 PM 939 Views
Re: An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 09:16:21 PM 953 Views
Lanfear killed Asmo..... - 28/05/2010 05:05:55 AM 913 Views
Doesn't make sense - 28/05/2010 11:09:14 AM 947 Views
Sorry, Lanfear did it..... - 29/05/2010 03:47:44 AM 888 Views
Death is Moridin "when death took him"; need I say more *NM* - 28/05/2010 10:07:14 AM 646 Views
There is a quote that refutes this... - 28/05/2010 10:22:12 AM 1000 Views
I think I found an RJ quote that kills the Slayer theory - 29/05/2010 01:57:20 PM 909 Views
If Slayer is actually the killer... - 29/05/2010 02:20:32 PM 974 Views
Please, RJ would do as he always had and immediately RAFOd a question like that - 29/05/2010 02:26:10 PM 933 Views
Well, I don't think so. - 29/05/2010 02:43:28 PM 948 Views
yet he never gave an answer like this one - 29/05/2010 02:57:35 PM 1031 Views
Again... - 29/05/2010 03:09:06 PM 1033 Views
Taking things NO - 29/05/2010 03:12:24 PM 1003 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer. - 06/06/2010 05:44:05 AM 835 Views
If Slayer never met Asmo in the books he could not have killed him - 06/06/2010 12:46:40 PM 838 Views
But Slayer could have met Asmo, when he was killed.. *NM* - 06/06/2010 01:06:01 PM 880 Views
Directly contradicts what RJ said "they did not meet in the books" - 06/06/2010 02:51:50 PM 848 Views
Not "before" the murder. *NM* - 06/06/2010 06:03:34 PM 921 Views
Re: Not "before" the murder. *NM* - 06/06/2010 10:25:16 PM 834 Views
He answers the question, if they met "before" the murder. *NM* - 07/06/2010 07:18:50 AM 641 Views
not if it didn't happen in the books - 07/06/2010 12:08:34 PM 771 Views
I'm relieved then... - 07/06/2010 12:13:58 PM 790 Views
it's nearly as simplistic as knowing Graendal did it - 07/06/2010 12:48:42 PM 932 Views
Compilation of the clues I could find on Slayer and Graendal - 29/05/2010 04:26:58 PM 1013 Views
I think Asmo's killer was as surprised as he. - 29/05/2010 09:26:03 PM 956 Views
That's what I've always thought as well. - 29/05/2010 10:06:56 PM 871 Views
That's always been my theory too - 29/05/2010 10:18:30 PM 985 Views
*nods* - 29/05/2010 11:23:18 PM 1002 Views
Re: That's always been my theory too - 30/05/2010 07:35:50 AM 927 Views
You know, there's no direct proof suggesting that Asmo's killer was "surprised"..... - 01/06/2010 04:04:56 AM 885 Views
That's why I said "I think" and offered my opinion. - 01/06/2010 09:46:09 PM 899 Views
except the Author said it was a murder of opportunity - 01/06/2010 11:13:14 PM 912 Views
That is simply false. - 02/06/2010 10:00:27 AM 951 Views
RJ stated it was a murder of opportunity ... I never said "only" - 02/06/2010 11:49:23 AM 1019 Views
Of course, it is false - 02/06/2010 12:13:11 PM 939 Views
Here are the quotes - 02/06/2010 12:39:29 PM 877 Views
As said, those quotes simply don't support that the murder was basically just an unplanned accident. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:14:29 PM 646 Views
I disagree. It's pretty much black and white that the opportunity/timing is the key factor to - 02/06/2010 02:39:03 PM 799 Views
Actually I like it because it fits Slayer better than Graendal, as pointed out. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:51:24 PM 485 Views
that makes no sense at all *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:53:28 PM 697 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer. - 06/06/2010 05:47:13 AM 974 Views
Well... - 06/06/2010 10:46:13 AM 964 Views
Logic - 06/06/2010 02:53:27 PM 912 Views
You're falling into Etzelian logic there... - 06/06/2010 03:25:30 PM 917 Views
I'm just being a smartass *NM* - 06/06/2010 03:36:00 PM 659 Views
It's good that Etzel sticks to his guns - 06/06/2010 04:42:01 PM 1027 Views
OMG, Taim and Mesaana were getting it on in the pantry - 06/06/2010 09:49:57 PM 887 Views
That reminds me... - 19/06/2010 04:46:58 AM 910 Views
That's not anyone's logic, this argument is simply utter nonsense. *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:08:05 PM 952 Views
just like thinking Slayer was the killer is - 07/06/2010 12:09:34 PM 896 Views
Yeah... - 07/06/2010 12:21:31 PM 964 Views
thinking the top assassin killed someone when it's been stated over and over - 07/06/2010 12:56:48 PM 952 Views
Those quotes pretty much show that Graendal is careful... *NM* - 07/06/2010 01:03:26 PM 879 Views
No they show that she is deliberate! - 07/06/2010 01:12:29 PM 978 Views
That are just semantics - 07/06/2010 01:36:12 PM 1047 Views
and you think it's obvious that Slayer was the premier Shadow assassin prior to WH? - 07/06/2010 02:06:47 PM 932 Views
As I explained you several times, I can see why RJ thought it is obvious, yes... - 07/06/2010 02:17:01 PM 902 Views
Why wouldn't Graendal head to Caemlyn at that point? - 07/06/2010 02:36:24 PM 987 Views
And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin? - 07/06/2010 02:54:33 PM 1023 Views
Re: And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin? - 07/06/2010 03:01:14 PM 988 Views
You should re-read the scene where Moghedien tells Nynaeve about it... - 07/06/2010 03:12:55 PM 955 Views
That's a different thing than Moghedien saying the plan was canceled - 07/06/2010 03:15:32 PM 1049 Views
That is essentially what Moghedien said. - 07/06/2010 03:33:35 PM 823 Views
um no it's not - 07/06/2010 04:17:04 PM 903 Views
It's told after that... - 07/06/2010 04:46:31 PM 872 Views
No it doesn't. It tells us that Rahvin, just like all the others had a side plan in place - 07/06/2010 04:55:43 PM 1055 Views
Yeah... - 07/06/2010 05:17:59 PM 952 Views
Funny I feel the same way you do ... - 07/06/2010 05:25:48 PM 943 Views
Ah, whatever... - 07/06/2010 05:35:22 PM 844 Views
We are on the exact same page - 07/06/2010 05:42:48 PM 924 Views
Re: We are on the exact same page - 07/06/2010 05:52:37 PM 999 Views
LMAO - 07/06/2010 06:07:16 PM 1373 Views
I promised Etzel long ago... - 19/06/2010 04:49:11 AM 920 Views

Reply to Message