Active Users:784 Time:03/04/2025 04:21:03 AM
I know... Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/05/2010 07:54:03 PM
That the majority of readers would agree with you that it's plausible that Graendal was there. But IMO it isn't, especially because we hardly knew anything about Graendal before LoC, except that she is a very obscene Forsaken. For example, Sammael would have been a more obvious candidate before LoC.

Also RJ's comment that the two servants Rand sees when he hunts Rahvin are in no way connected to the murder makes it rather unlikely to me that nonetheless Graendal was there to Compel any servants, unseen to the readers and that this is the reason for the murder.

Besides, if Graendal searched someone to use Complusion on to gather infos, it only makes sense to strike with heavy Compulsion on Asmo, abduct & interrogate and then kill him. This would be a perfect opportunity to Graendal to learn more about Rand & his plans. Like she tried in PoD with Cyndane & Moghedien.

As said, if balefire was used, it only makes sense that Graendal would use very weak balefire, but we know that in this case the DO can transmigrate the balefired person (but concerning Asmo, the DO couldn't).

It wasn't a big mystery, but I still think that RJ had a precise idea of what happened to Asmo. That a killer, who uses TAR, takes him there to die and get rid off his body, isn't such a complex thought. And that RJ indicated that he will most likely reveal it in the PoV of the killer speaks against Graendal as well because she is most likely dead and won't have another PoV.

It also makes sense to consider that the same killer, who already assassinated people associated to the Shadow twice before in the series, namely in the Stone of Tear and in Tar Valon, struck again in Caemlyn.
Reply to message
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean. - 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM 1205 Views
It's unlikely - 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM 883 Views
Re: It's unlikely - 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM 845 Views
Well... - 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM 832 Views
A few points - 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM 628 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM 701 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM 695 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM 676 Views
Actually I believe... - 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM 744 Views
Re: Actually I believe... - 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM 739 Views
I think... - 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM 664 Views
Re: I think... - 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM 606 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM* - 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM 313 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. - 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM 626 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM* - 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM 278 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference - 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM 650 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM* - 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM 289 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. - 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM 614 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view - 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM 670 Views
That doesn't make sense - 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM 636 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer. - 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM 582 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be - 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM 651 Views
You confuse two things... - 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM 567 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought - 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM 589 Views
I argue... - 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM 750 Views
we don't know any of that until WH - 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM 733 Views
I cite your statement a few posts above... - 27/05/2010 12:59:06 PM 625 Views
Re: I cite your statement a few posts above... - 27/05/2010 01:14:51 PM 647 Views
Thanks! - 26/05/2010 07:12:01 PM 621 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 05:55:27 PM 684 Views
I think you are grasping a little - 26/05/2010 07:11:36 PM 682 Views
Re: Well... - 26/05/2010 04:15:42 PM 717 Views
I know... - 26/05/2010 07:54:03 PM 676 Views
Re: I know... - 26/05/2010 11:58:13 PM 558 Views
Re: I know... - 27/05/2010 09:41:20 AM 722 Views
graendal - 26/05/2010 11:57:04 PM 603 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien - 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM 658 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM 643 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM 667 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM 669 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =) - 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM 618 Views
Maybe she did it, but you misjudge Lanfear bigtime, I think - 26/05/2010 07:12:09 PM 672 Views
Aviendha(sp) done it *NM* - 26/05/2010 09:20:11 PM 327 Views
I agree - 30/05/2010 09:44:57 PM 830 Views

Reply to Message