Active Users:439 Time:04/11/2024 05:26:37 PM
Winter's Heart Werthead Send a noteboard - 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
I think WH gets probably too much praise based on the dubious premise it is better than PoD and CoT. Sure, it's much better than its two neighbours, but it's still a deeply flawed novel, most notably for the total lack of movement on the Perrin/Faile storyline, the disappointing and perfunctory depiction of the biggest, game-changing event so far in the series (the Cleansing) and the extremely pointless Far Madding storyline.

That said, Roberts is possibly too harsh. Whilst pointless to the overall narrative, the Far Madding storyline is started, unfolded and resolved within this one novel, as is Mat's quest to leave Ebou Dar (although that still should have been a three-chapter storyline at best). Combined with the Cleansing which, badly-depicted as it is, is nevertheless a major plot movement, you do have a book which is not completely inert. Also, by lambasting WH for its stasis, he's left himself with nowhere to go for the stationary CROSSROADS OF TWILIGHT next week.
Link
Reply to message
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM 12265 Views
A question for Larry - 19/03/2010 09:40:37 PM 2803 Views
Roberto BolaƱo - 19/03/2010 11:09:57 PM 2589 Views
I completely agree with his review. - 19/03/2010 11:11:17 PM 2773 Views
Ouch! Somebody pull that guy off RJ! *NM* - 20/03/2010 03:47:07 AM 1363 Views
Can't say that I really disagree. - 20/03/2010 05:19:26 AM 2085 Views
My problem with the reviews: - 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM 2731 Views
Hear Hear !!! ....................... = ........................ *NM* - 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM 1310 Views
I agree - 20/03/2010 11:19:29 AM 2180 Views
You know what else I'm finding annoying? - 07/04/2010 07:29:37 AM 2123 Views
Fully Agree *NM* - 21/06/2010 12:41:05 AM 1188 Views
well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM 2481 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM 2017 Views
I'd say just The Eye of the World - 20/03/2010 05:26:19 PM 2036 Views
Indeed - 21/03/2010 12:34:19 AM 1997 Views
These reviews are pathetic - 20/03/2010 12:52:22 PM 1994 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses - 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM 2418 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/03/2010 10:48:14 PM 1519 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ? - 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM 2173 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes - 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM 2180 Views
I considered doing so - 21/03/2010 12:27:27 AM 2006 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ? - 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM 1972 Views
My sister called me chicken once - 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM 2010 Views
what's wrong runt... are you yellah? *NM* - 10/04/2010 10:40:16 AM 1267 Views
NICE! *NM* - 10/04/2010 02:19:44 PM 1131 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses - 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM 2061 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM 2005 Views
Re: And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 03:03:28 AM 1873 Views
Nah, TGS was the only serious review of the series I've done - 24/03/2010 04:31:28 AM 1947 Views
On a completely unrelated note... - 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM 1854 Views
Ha! - 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM 1912 Views
My congratulations then . *NM* - 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM 1825 Views
You say it as if I had been condemned to hell! - 24/03/2010 07:13:45 AM 1734 Views
No. Well, maybe. - 24/03/2010 06:52:28 PM 1871 Views
! - 24/03/2010 06:54:34 PM 1889 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 22/03/2010 02:47:23 PM 2014 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 01:53:16 PM 1975 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series - 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM 2056 Views
There's a point to it? - 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM 2022 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM* - 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM 1280 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you? - 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM 1968 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place - 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM 1922 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening? - 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM 2014 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 04:54:38 PM 1975 Views
pfft wth-ever - 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM 1828 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM 2083 Views
bla bla bla - 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM 1946 Views
Usually, it's spelled "blah" - 29/03/2010 07:03:51 AM 1913 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM 1448 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM 1872 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM 1987 Views
I know you were, thus the at the least of my comment - 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM 1841 Views
Unimpressed - 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM 2262 Views
Thank you - 30/03/2010 12:35:39 AM 1758 Views
*Standing ovation for DomA* - 30/03/2010 07:36:59 AM 1990 Views
Yes. Also, Roberts is a wanker. *NM* - 05/04/2010 09:28:57 PM 1290 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM 1972 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again. - 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM 1881 Views
Awards - 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM 1838 Views
That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM 1814 Views
Re: That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM 1933 Views
This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM 1851 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM 1900 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM 1880 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM 2029 Views
The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM 1769 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM 1764 Views
No, no, no - 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM 1823 Views
Re: No, no, no - 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM 1934 Views
Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM 1881 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM 1835 Views
Those were polls - 31/03/2010 08:46:07 PM 1841 Views
Re: Those were polls - 05/04/2010 03:22:13 PM 1818 Views
Does it gives him right to insult me? - 13/04/2011 02:10:32 PM 1828 Views
I wouldn't know. Was he speaking directly to you? - 14/04/2011 11:28:16 PM 1966 Views
He's now reviewed the third book - 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM 2080 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him . - 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM 1810 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that - 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM 1778 Views
Hah! - 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM 1832 Views
Well... - 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM 1750 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess. - 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM 1890 Views
I suppose - 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM 1806 Views
Re: I suppose - 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM 1968 Views
True - 30/03/2010 12:23:28 AM 1819 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM 1748 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM 1959 Views
But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM 1851 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 03:56:54 PM 1828 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:29:37 PM 1919 Views
I really liked a lot of the minor characters in The Great Hunt. - 30/03/2010 12:49:03 AM 1845 Views
I barely thought twice about those, to be honest - 30/03/2010 06:39:55 PM 1867 Views
I can't wait what he's going to try to do with TFoH and beyond - 28/03/2010 08:18:59 PM 1944 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 29/03/2010 09:33:43 PM 1764 Views
The Shadow Rising review - 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM 2063 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling - 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM 10608 Views
You want complaining? You got it... - 02/04/2010 06:38:09 PM 1939 Views
That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM 2080 Views
Re: That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM 1808 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter - 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM 1949 Views
Little late to this one as well - 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM 1970 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit - 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM 2017 Views
Re: I wonder if this borders on trolling - 04/04/2010 09:16:22 AM 1899 Views
What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM 2039 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM 2014 Views
See my comment below - 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM 2095 Views
Re: See my comment below - 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM 2425 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week - 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM 2258 Views
Yes, I can probably agree with what you say here. - 08/04/2010 12:29:16 AM 1725 Views
- 08/04/2010 12:32:53 AM 1858 Views
I agree completely. *NM* - 02/04/2010 09:53:44 PM 1152 Views
Speaking of irritation - 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM 2017 Views
Commentary, then? - 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM 1833 Views
Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM 1831 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM 1686 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 03/04/2010 01:34:05 AM 1745 Views
I somehow overlooked this last week, it seems - 10/04/2010 11:01:17 AM 2049 Views
Indeed - 02/04/2010 10:34:00 PM 1723 Views
Re: Commentary, then? - 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM 1824 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work - 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM 2005 Views
1400 words is long-winded? - 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM 2026 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded - 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM 1900 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit - 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM 1960 Views
You are very defensive over this - 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM 1733 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM 1812 Views
Re: Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 05:30:53 PM 1739 Views
You sound like a Goodkind webmaster from a couple of years ago - 12/04/2010 06:58:42 PM 1815 Views
You don't come across as a devil's advocate - 30/03/2011 03:07:32 PM 1819 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM 1957 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM 1825 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM 1704 Views
Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM 1922 Views
Re: Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 01:26:42 PM 1860 Views
I have a very different take on that book - 10/04/2010 11:17:13 AM 1773 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 09/04/2010 01:45:44 PM 1824 Views
Hrmm... - 10/04/2010 11:19:01 AM 1695 Views
Re: Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 12/04/2010 05:37:36 PM 1930 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner - 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM 1886 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM 1891 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM 2436 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM 1868 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts? - 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM 1884 Views
I don't understand it either - 11/04/2010 12:44:25 PM 1862 Views
right? - 11/04/2010 02:13:00 PM 1889 Views
Nah - 12/04/2010 04:13:44 AM 1696 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus - 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM 1847 Views
5 reviews without saying more than "I hate the series" - 09/04/2010 01:31:13 PM 1728 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument... - 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM 1747 Views
Well, what was really resolved here? - 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM 1825 Views
Well... - 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM 1929 Views
well exactly - 12/04/2010 05:33:11 PM 1959 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then? - 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM 1935 Views
Yes... - 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM 1660 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon? - 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM 1962 Views
I guess... - 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM 1962 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest - 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM 3103 Views
Nah... - 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM 1694 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others - 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM 1768 Views
Ah, well... - 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM 1723 Views
Dismissive, much? - 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM 1861 Views
About that bifurcation... - 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM 1832 Views
I'm rather moderate - 14/04/2010 10:11:30 AM 1748 Views
I'm just a liberation theologist at heart - 15/04/2010 01:51:16 PM 2663 Views
So, if you don't mind... - 13/04/2010 05:51:06 AM 1850 Views
That's fine with me - 13/04/2010 06:31:41 AM 1818 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS. - 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM 1831 Views
I didn't find it quite that bad, but... - 11/04/2010 08:27:52 AM 1834 Views
LoC represented a sharp drop in quality!!? - 19/05/2010 03:27:21 PM 1849 Views
And ignores everything else... - 09/04/2010 05:10:00 PM 1884 Views
Inchoatus went offline a couple of years ago - 10/04/2010 11:42:26 AM 2814 Views
This guy is going to get what he deserves... - 09/04/2010 10:26:14 PM 1830 Views
I'm waiting with bated breath for his CoT review *NM* - 10/04/2010 01:00:59 PM 1241 Views
Just wanted to point out that he is not reviewing the series. - 16/04/2010 04:04:49 PM 1777 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary - 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM 1824 Views
He has reached - The Hump. - 16/04/2010 03:55:51 PM 1771 Views
Re: He has reached - The Hump. - 18/04/2010 08:08:59 AM 2229 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven! - 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM 1740 Views
Yeah, I noticed that - 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM 1663 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind... - 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM 1846 Views
Finally re-read that post - 20/04/2010 09:35:45 PM 1855 Views
The magic items are mostly irrelevant... - 21/04/2010 03:37:36 AM 1837 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM 1948 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM 1887 Views
I disagree - 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM 1699 Views
I agree. - 29/04/2010 09:45:29 PM 1892 Views
Took me a moment to realize with whom you were agreeing - 29/04/2010 10:19:05 PM 1786 Views
Well, I did mention the necklines get overdone... - 06/05/2010 06:17:46 PM 2134 Views
Well, there's now also the tea to comment about - 07/05/2010 11:29:03 AM 1906 Views
A bit of a stumble this week - 30/04/2010 01:53:31 PM 1944 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary - 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM 1976 Views
You'd think a Brit would like the tea... *NM* - 11/05/2010 04:05:42 PM 1107 Views
Maybe he's just a contrarian? - 11/05/2010 07:55:43 PM 1762 Views
Winter's Heart - 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM 1965 Views
To be fair - 21/05/2010 01:56:49 PM 2111 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM 1822 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM 1986 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot. - 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM 1875 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote: - 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM 2148 Views
CoT, you mean (link to actual post included) - 28/05/2010 04:56:10 PM 1977 Views
Yep, I meant COT. *NM* - 28/05/2010 07:02:48 PM 1117 Views
Knife of Dreams - 18/06/2010 09:07:27 AM 1854 Views
Re: Knife of Dreams - 19/06/2010 05:49:38 AM 1939 Views
Agree... - 19/06/2010 05:08:44 PM 1899 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him - 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM 1938 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake - 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM 9358 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark? - 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM 1876 Views
Oh come on... - 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM 1955 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much... - 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM 1974 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice... - 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM 1979 Views
And your point is...? - 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM 1999 Views
Well... - 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM 1954 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble - 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM 2090 Views
There is no "borderline" about it. - 28/03/2011 05:17:15 PM 1810 Views
Ridiculous - 27/06/2010 06:38:46 AM 1847 Views
I like his FAQ and his overall musings on its' popularity. - 29/06/2010 06:35:10 PM 1895 Views
One year later... - 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM 1813 Views
Re: One year later... - 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM 2018 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes. - 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM 2027 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM* - 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM 1174 Views
Jealous? - 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM 1815 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM 1098 Views
Seconded. - 30/03/2011 04:04:36 PM 1760 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM* - 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM 1227 Views
Yep! - 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM 1751 Views
Jeez Larry, you're starting to sound like a GRRM detractor. - 31/03/2011 03:01:38 PM 1916 Views
Nah, no detractor - 01/04/2011 03:00:41 PM 1908 Views
Could a thread be locked? - 31/03/2011 07:48:26 PM 1773 Views
Re: One year later... - 01/04/2011 02:55:02 AM 2144 Views
Yep - 01/04/2011 02:57:52 PM 1903 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM 1112 Views

Reply to Message