Stop being hysterical and debate like an adult.
There is no debate going on here. I am apparently instructing you on things you should already know, that I know you know, and yet you claim ignorance of. I have no idea what it is you're doing, but debate is not an appropriate term for it.
The rebellion against Elaida was not due to the lie, it was merely a falsehood Siuan later created and expanded upon to further her own cause to bring down her rival, and to gain the dubious support of the rebel Hall. You've encapsulated the entire White Tower split under this, which is blatantly untrue. Do you think you're dealing with unintelligent people, or do you seriously think I'm less aware of the series than you are?
Nobody ever claimed it was. I know strawmen are easier to vanquish, but how about sticking to actual relevant topics? I noted that the White Tower division was about
politicking for control of either Halls, useless hierarchical crap like Shemerin's demotion, the outrage over stuff like Elaida disbanding the Blue Ajah
and
Aes Sedai cared more about their own squabbling than the end of the world.
The clever reader will notice that this is not at all what you dishonestly accuse me of implying.
We're talking about the present. You're going back to the earlier books and referring to those as part of your evidence of 'squabbling'. The split occured in book 4, and the attack on the Black Tower a few books later. The later books show the opinion of the Red Ajah on this - they find the lie scandalous but they're more concerned with the Black Tower (not invasion - but bonding) and the Dragon Reborn. Pevara and Tsutama openly speak about this.
No we're not talking about the present. We're talking, at latest, of the contents of The Gathering Storm, as I corrected two posts ago. As for the Black Tower, I've already addressed this. The entire operation was handled in secret. Pevara recounts in Remember the Old Saying how she had to search for tiny clues to find Red Sisters to involve in the operation. This is not 'the Red Ajah' having greater priorities, it is Tsutama Rath having greater priorities. And good for her. I don't expect every Aes Sedai in the Tower to be an idiot.
I don't know why you've gone off on such a childish tangent about everything. You mentioned that it's about time the Reds mentioned the lie i.e. now that the Tower is reunified. I mentioned that the Reds are much more worried about other events that are taking place. Bringing up what happened six books ago makes no sense, and acting like I'm unfamiliar with the plot is extremely insulting.
Quit your whining and actually read my posts! Do you remember this?
EDIT: Okay, on further thought, I have come to a solution in which you didn't fail to notice or understand a significant portion of the series (which made no sense to me anyway, given that I know that you should be suitably aware of this), is it possible that you, like Cannoli was, are under the assumption that I expect something to happen about this in upcoming books? Because I obviously don't. The perfect timing for this to be addressed was in The Gathering Storm, and I was expressing frustration and incredulity that it was never brought up then, as displayed by my use of past tenses and reference to Elaida (who is now in Seanchan hands).
I make it explicitly cleat that the time to bring it up was The Gathering Storm and that it would not make sense for it to be brought up now. And despite this, you just ridiculously claimed that I expect this to be brought up "now that the Tower is reunified", which is the exact opposite of what I claimed.
And of course it's insulting to treat you like you're unfamiliar with the plot. But when you act like you're unfamiliar with the plot, how am I to treat you? I brought up the only to possibilities I could think of in that post I quoted: either you're ignorant of a core part of the series' plot, or you mistakenly believe that I expect this to happen in the future. I actually expected this to be a simple misunderstanding, but then in response to my query you claim that "[You're] also not deluded about the meaning of [my] post." and continue arguing like you're unfamiliar with the plot? What am I to conclude? How was to guess you'd simply [b]not bothered to read my post[/b] before ranting senselessly?
Speaking of insulting, in the future, please take a second to read the posts you are replying to.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Character discussion 2 : Siuan Sanche and Leane Sharif
09/05/2010 06:01:33 PM
- 5021 Views
The "Shrinking of Siuan" after stilling destroyed my initial awe for the Amyrlin positition...
09/05/2010 07:07:09 PM
- 1048 Views
That's total nonsense...
10/05/2010 08:34:08 AM
- 1096 Views
No, THAT's total nonsense...
10/05/2010 09:27:41 AM
- 969 Views
You seem to deal in bad analogies...
10/05/2010 05:14:47 PM
- 970 Views
You've got an irritating manner about you. No wonder you find Aes Sedai so believable.
10/05/2010 05:53:00 PM
- 826 Views
Hello Pot. I'm Kettle.
10/05/2010 06:41:58 PM
- 837 Views
Hello Kettle. I'm Frying pan *NM*
11/05/2010 03:43:20 PM
- 480 Views
Hello Frying pan. I'm Skillet. *NM*
12/05/2010 11:50:33 PM
- 493 Views
Re: Hello Skillet, I'm a baking sheet can't we all have some cookies and get along? *NM*
17/05/2010 05:17:24 PM
- 435 Views
All of those people EARNED their positions by being the best, not a compromise candidate for office!
12/05/2010 04:36:36 AM
- 1049 Views
Re: The "Shrinking of Siuan" after stilling destroyed my initial awe for the Amyrlin positition...
12/05/2010 04:23:07 AM
- 911 Views
Re: The "Shrinking of Siuan" after stilling destroyed my initial awe for the Amyrlin positition...
12/05/2010 06:33:37 AM
- 872 Views
They deserved to be deposed and stilled, I think ...
10/05/2010 02:47:35 PM
- 1007 Views
"They"?
10/05/2010 05:16:54 PM
- 905 Views
Good point ...
10/05/2010 06:45:52 PM
- 1037 Views
I don't know if I agree with this
11/05/2010 03:19:20 PM
- 970 Views
I like Leane, and respected Siuan until RJ mauled her character
10/05/2010 05:55:08 PM
- 859 Views
She was probably the sacrificial lamb in place of Moiraine
10/05/2010 06:25:39 PM
- 815 Views
The deck was certainly stacked against Siuan from the very beginning
11/05/2010 02:44:05 PM
- 865 Views
This is a main reason I hope Siuan and Leanne get their full strength restored
11/05/2010 02:25:31 PM
- 923 Views
I don't really agree
11/05/2010 05:35:44 PM
- 849 Views
I see your point and like I said, I think there are certainly other resolutions to the story line
11/05/2010 06:22:44 PM
- 828 Views
I'm still annoyed that Siuan is not going to face the consequences of lying about the Reds.
12/05/2010 05:18:47 AM
- 907 Views
In Egwene's defense, it would be hypocritical of her to bring that up after profiting from it
12/05/2010 05:59:57 AM
- 881 Views
Oh, I never expected Egwene to do something about this.
12/05/2010 06:12:35 AM
- 781 Views
Well she's off forging a relationship with the Asha'man - you know, useful stuff? *NM*
12/05/2010 06:39:04 AM
- 540 Views
Are you claiming that Pevara was the only woman in the entire Red Ajah to be offended by that lie? *NM*
12/05/2010 07:15:40 AM
- 482 Views
The Reds aren't petty
12/05/2010 04:52:50 PM
- 757 Views
Are you kidding?
12/05/2010 06:14:46 PM
- 878 Views
Unless of course there is truth to it
17/05/2010 01:50:27 PM
- 885 Views
There is none.
17/05/2010 07:09:59 PM
- 879 Views
Uhhh?
17/05/2010 08:45:15 PM
- 790 Views
...
17/05/2010 11:08:05 PM
- 930 Views
Re: ...
18/05/2010 05:25:33 AM
- 863 Views
Seriously, are you kidding? [EDIT]
18/05/2010 06:06:01 AM
- 847 Views
*sigh*
18/05/2010 12:30:43 PM
- 906 Views
So, you're not kidding.
18/05/2010 09:12:27 PM
- 811 Views
Re: So, you're not kidding.
18/05/2010 10:25:19 PM
- 847 Views
Re: So, you're not kidding.
19/05/2010 12:41:09 AM
- 941 Views
On the minority thing...
18/05/2010 04:26:15 PM
- 881 Views
That's exactly the problem.
18/05/2010 08:51:45 PM
- 749 Views
Really do you have a quote supporting the fact that there has never been a FD supported by a Red?
18/05/2010 09:39:31 PM
- 883 Views
Of course..., I'll provide it as soon as you prove you're not a Nazi serial child rapist.
18/05/2010 10:06:23 PM
- 718 Views
why so pissy?
19/05/2010 03:34:22 PM
- 877 Views
Sorry.
20/05/2010 04:16:43 AM
- 843 Views
Re: Sorry.
20/05/2010 08:19:13 AM
- 709 Views
Re: Sorry.
20/05/2010 08:33:54 AM
- 908 Views
Re: Sorry.
20/05/2010 01:26:47 PM
- 751 Views
Interesting.
20/05/2010 07:34:45 PM
- 808 Views
Re: Interesting.
21/05/2010 05:07:07 AM
- 829 Views
No worries! I was just caught off guard by your response... sorry for your stress! *NM*
20/05/2010 10:04:35 PM
- 582 Views
There may be one explanation...
13/05/2010 10:04:46 PM
- 794 Views
That doesn't make sense.
13/05/2010 10:54:53 PM
- 920 Views
it was about more than just male channelers
18/05/2010 09:50:14 PM
- 909 Views
Yes, that's true.
18/05/2010 10:07:22 PM
- 926 Views
I'm also certain the majority of the Red had no clue/involvement
20/05/2010 10:24:54 PM
- 825 Views
That's also true.
20/05/2010 10:29:11 PM
- 812 Views
Okay I'm leaving you alone ... you clearly don't want to continue
20/05/2010 10:31:01 PM
- 812 Views
AS shrunk after stilling; Siuan and Leane became huge.
12/05/2010 10:50:50 PM
- 812 Views
No, I don't think so
13/05/2010 05:10:03 AM
- 749 Views