Active Users:425 Time:04/04/2025 05:36:22 PM
Re: Take two Datakim Send a noteboard - 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
I think if you go back and read my response again, you'll find that I already answered your questions.


Umm, maybe I missed it, could you quickly answer it again.

I mean I recall that I talked to you about balefire before and asked you why for example Cadsuane could not just reverse Rand's death by balefiring Gawyn and essentially making it so that Rand had not died in the first place. Cadsuane would do it considering how utterly critical Rand is.

I think you answered that Cadsuane could not balefire Gawyn, because Rand&Gawyn would basically kill eachother and therefore Gawyn would be dead and no longer available for balefiring. Am I right? This is a good enough answer.

The question that has occurred to me is that since Rand KNOWS what balefire is and what it does, if Rand were to be critically injured by Gawyn, WHY would Rand retaliate at that point rather than just hedge his bet and let Gawyn go on living in the hope that Cadsuane or someone will hopefully hunt him down and balefire Gawyn and revive him that way.

The only answer I can see to this is that either

a)Rand is an idiot who ignores the possibility of Balefire "healing" him from Gawyn's attack. I would like to think that after his revelation at Dragonmount he will act smarter in the future and as such not be an idiot.

or

b)Rand and Gawyn will injure each other simultaneously the way Rand did with Ishamael at Falme. But this explanation is weak in that given how sickly&injured Rand is, I don't really believe that Rand is capable of such a feat anymore with someone as skilled with the sword as Gawyn.


So basically, I now wonder why is it that if your theory becomes true, Rand would not just let Gawyn go DESPITE the fact that Gawyn just killed so that Gawyn would still be alive and available for balefiring and therefore Cadsuane could bring Rand back from the dead.

Unless you think that Rand is still physically capable of matching Gawyn enough to kill him the same time that Gawyn returns the favor.
Reply to message
My new 'loony' theory - 03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM 2326 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here... - 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM 1218 Views
Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though. - 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM 1348 Views
Of course, I prefer my theory.... - 03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM 1081 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan - 03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM 1260 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory! - 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM 1205 Views
See, this is why I am right and you are wrong! - 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM 1028 Views
In my view - 04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM 962 Views
Still prejudiced, of course... - 04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM 1080 Views
Just disagreeing - 04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM 1054 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence. - 04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM 1038 Views
Well... - 04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM 949 Views
This is getting silly - 04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM 928 Views
Mat's reasons for giving up the foxhead ter'angreal - 03/05/2010 03:53:43 PM 1151 Views
Why only the gholam? - 04/05/2010 04:00:18 AM 1020 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory - 03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM 1114 Views
cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM 1172 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM 942 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM 1024 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM 1154 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM 1097 Views
oops *NM* - 04/05/2010 09:28:11 AM 641 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 03:17:42 PM 1111 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line? - 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM 1049 Views
Yes. What of it? *NM* - 05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM 650 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory - 04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM 1104 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws? - 04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM 1089 Views
Re: what comments by Brandon, and what flaws? - 05/05/2010 02:34:33 AM 1240 Views
Thanks. - 05/05/2010 03:21:53 AM 1132 Views
No go. *NM* - 03/11/2010 03:14:13 AM 565 Views
Who draws it out shall follow after - 04/05/2010 12:33:56 PM 1155 Views
I don't think.... - 04/05/2010 01:22:21 PM 1039 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand - 06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM 888 Views
Indeed he did. - 06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM 1274 Views
But... - 06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM 1087 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence! - 06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM 916 Views
Well... - 06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM 1023 Views
*sigh* - 06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM 1114 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea! - 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM 1082 Views
You won't. - 06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM 1036 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic - 06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM 1147 Views
Reading comprehension issues. *NM* - 06/05/2010 02:43:28 PM 616 Views
Ah, come on, it's fun to discuss! - 06/05/2010 02:49:01 PM 950 Views
the problem there - 07/05/2010 05:45:23 AM 984 Views
more to the point - 07/05/2010 04:45:40 AM 1018 Views
considering Rand won't hurt Elayne - 07/05/2010 05:46:23 AM 939 Views
wow - 06/05/2010 01:46:22 AM 1076 Views
thanks! - 06/05/2010 07:25:25 AM 897 Views
Re: thanks! - 12/05/2010 10:50:50 PM 979 Views
Nice theory ... - 07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM 1117 Views
Or Elayne could just give it to Gawyn. - 07/05/2010 07:34:44 PM 1028 Views
True, but I prefer the idea that he'll steal it because ... - 07/05/2010 08:32:29 PM 966 Views
Thanks - 08/05/2010 07:56:17 AM 956 Views
Nice! But how about.... - 12/05/2010 01:58:00 PM 1191 Views
They'll kill each other - 12/05/2010 02:22:18 PM 884 Views
Also - 12/05/2010 09:06:25 PM 1010 Views
Re: Also - 12/05/2010 10:49:51 PM 980 Views
Actually - 12/05/2010 11:50:26 PM 1121 Views
Take two - 17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM 963 Views
Re: Take two - 17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM 975 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM 1035 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM 1120 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM 1051 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 03:22:37 AM 1176 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 06:32:57 AM 1011 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 07:11:08 PM 888 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 10:07:36 PM 951 Views
From DomA's World Con report - 18/05/2010 10:42:48 PM 942 Views
Yeah, we knew that... - 19/05/2010 08:25:04 AM 1178 Views

Reply to Message