Active Users:345 Time:26/04/2025 01:17:14 PM
Re: Take two Datakim Send a noteboard - 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
I think if you go back and read my response again, you'll find that I already answered your questions.


Umm, maybe I missed it, could you quickly answer it again.

I mean I recall that I talked to you about balefire before and asked you why for example Cadsuane could not just reverse Rand's death by balefiring Gawyn and essentially making it so that Rand had not died in the first place. Cadsuane would do it considering how utterly critical Rand is.

I think you answered that Cadsuane could not balefire Gawyn, because Rand&Gawyn would basically kill eachother and therefore Gawyn would be dead and no longer available for balefiring. Am I right? This is a good enough answer.

The question that has occurred to me is that since Rand KNOWS what balefire is and what it does, if Rand were to be critically injured by Gawyn, WHY would Rand retaliate at that point rather than just hedge his bet and let Gawyn go on living in the hope that Cadsuane or someone will hopefully hunt him down and balefire Gawyn and revive him that way.

The only answer I can see to this is that either

a)Rand is an idiot who ignores the possibility of Balefire "healing" him from Gawyn's attack. I would like to think that after his revelation at Dragonmount he will act smarter in the future and as such not be an idiot.

or

b)Rand and Gawyn will injure each other simultaneously the way Rand did with Ishamael at Falme. But this explanation is weak in that given how sickly&injured Rand is, I don't really believe that Rand is capable of such a feat anymore with someone as skilled with the sword as Gawyn.


So basically, I now wonder why is it that if your theory becomes true, Rand would not just let Gawyn go DESPITE the fact that Gawyn just killed so that Gawyn would still be alive and available for balefiring and therefore Cadsuane could bring Rand back from the dead.

Unless you think that Rand is still physically capable of matching Gawyn enough to kill him the same time that Gawyn returns the favor.
Reply to message
My new 'loony' theory - 03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM 2332 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here... - 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM 1224 Views
Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though. - 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM 1353 Views
Of course, I prefer my theory.... - 03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM 1088 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan - 03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM 1266 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory! - 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM 1212 Views
See, this is why I am right and you are wrong! - 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM 1033 Views
In my view - 04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM 970 Views
Still prejudiced, of course... - 04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM 1085 Views
Just disagreeing - 04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM 1059 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence. - 04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM 1053 Views
Well... - 04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM 955 Views
This is getting silly - 04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM 934 Views
Mat's reasons for giving up the foxhead ter'angreal - 03/05/2010 03:53:43 PM 1156 Views
Why only the gholam? - 04/05/2010 04:00:18 AM 1031 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory - 03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM 1119 Views
cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM 1179 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM 946 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM 1032 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM 1159 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM 1102 Views
oops *NM* - 04/05/2010 09:28:11 AM 644 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 03:17:42 PM 1118 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line? - 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM 1054 Views
Yes. What of it? *NM* - 05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM 653 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory - 04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM 1109 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws? - 04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM 1095 Views
Re: what comments by Brandon, and what flaws? - 05/05/2010 02:34:33 AM 1247 Views
Thanks. - 05/05/2010 03:21:53 AM 1138 Views
No go. *NM* - 03/11/2010 03:14:13 AM 567 Views
Who draws it out shall follow after - 04/05/2010 12:33:56 PM 1160 Views
I don't think.... - 04/05/2010 01:22:21 PM 1044 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand - 06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM 894 Views
Indeed he did. - 06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM 1280 Views
But... - 06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM 1092 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence! - 06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM 922 Views
Well... - 06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM 1028 Views
*sigh* - 06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM 1121 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea! - 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM 1087 Views
You won't. - 06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM 1044 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic - 06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM 1153 Views
Reading comprehension issues. *NM* - 06/05/2010 02:43:28 PM 619 Views
Ah, come on, it's fun to discuss! - 06/05/2010 02:49:01 PM 956 Views
the problem there - 07/05/2010 05:45:23 AM 989 Views
more to the point - 07/05/2010 04:45:40 AM 1023 Views
considering Rand won't hurt Elayne - 07/05/2010 05:46:23 AM 946 Views
wow - 06/05/2010 01:46:22 AM 1083 Views
thanks! - 06/05/2010 07:25:25 AM 903 Views
Re: thanks! - 12/05/2010 10:50:50 PM 983 Views
Nice theory ... - 07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM 1124 Views
Or Elayne could just give it to Gawyn. - 07/05/2010 07:34:44 PM 1035 Views
True, but I prefer the idea that he'll steal it because ... - 07/05/2010 08:32:29 PM 973 Views
Thanks - 08/05/2010 07:56:17 AM 964 Views
Nice! But how about.... - 12/05/2010 01:58:00 PM 1199 Views
They'll kill each other - 12/05/2010 02:22:18 PM 888 Views
Also - 12/05/2010 09:06:25 PM 1016 Views
Re: Also - 12/05/2010 10:49:51 PM 986 Views
Actually - 12/05/2010 11:50:26 PM 1128 Views
Take two - 17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM 968 Views
Re: Take two - 17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM 982 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM 1041 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM 1127 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM 1055 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 03:22:37 AM 1181 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 06:32:57 AM 1018 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 07:11:08 PM 894 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 10:07:36 PM 958 Views
From DomA's World Con report - 18/05/2010 10:42:48 PM 947 Views
Yeah, we knew that... - 19/05/2010 08:25:04 AM 1183 Views

Reply to Message