Active Users:388 Time:24/02/2025 07:28:01 AM
Re: Take two Datakim Send a noteboard - 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
I think if you go back and read my response again, you'll find that I already answered your questions.


Umm, maybe I missed it, could you quickly answer it again.

I mean I recall that I talked to you about balefire before and asked you why for example Cadsuane could not just reverse Rand's death by balefiring Gawyn and essentially making it so that Rand had not died in the first place. Cadsuane would do it considering how utterly critical Rand is.

I think you answered that Cadsuane could not balefire Gawyn, because Rand&Gawyn would basically kill eachother and therefore Gawyn would be dead and no longer available for balefiring. Am I right? This is a good enough answer.

The question that has occurred to me is that since Rand KNOWS what balefire is and what it does, if Rand were to be critically injured by Gawyn, WHY would Rand retaliate at that point rather than just hedge his bet and let Gawyn go on living in the hope that Cadsuane or someone will hopefully hunt him down and balefire Gawyn and revive him that way.

The only answer I can see to this is that either

a)Rand is an idiot who ignores the possibility of Balefire "healing" him from Gawyn's attack. I would like to think that after his revelation at Dragonmount he will act smarter in the future and as such not be an idiot.

or

b)Rand and Gawyn will injure each other simultaneously the way Rand did with Ishamael at Falme. But this explanation is weak in that given how sickly&injured Rand is, I don't really believe that Rand is capable of such a feat anymore with someone as skilled with the sword as Gawyn.


So basically, I now wonder why is it that if your theory becomes true, Rand would not just let Gawyn go DESPITE the fact that Gawyn just killed so that Gawyn would still be alive and available for balefiring and therefore Cadsuane could bring Rand back from the dead.

Unless you think that Rand is still physically capable of matching Gawyn enough to kill him the same time that Gawyn returns the favor.
Reply to message
My new 'loony' theory - 03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM 2305 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here... - 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM 1199 Views
Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though. - 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM 1327 Views
Of course, I prefer my theory.... - 03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM 1064 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan - 03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM 1237 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory! - 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM 1184 Views
See, this is why I am right and you are wrong! - 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM 1007 Views
In my view - 04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM 940 Views
Still prejudiced, of course... - 04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM 1061 Views
Just disagreeing - 04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM 1035 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence. - 04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM 1006 Views
Well... - 04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM 931 Views
This is getting silly - 04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM 908 Views
Mat's reasons for giving up the foxhead ter'angreal - 03/05/2010 03:53:43 PM 1119 Views
Why only the gholam? - 04/05/2010 04:00:18 AM 1002 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory - 03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM 1094 Views
cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM 1150 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM 920 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM 1000 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM 1131 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM 1076 Views
oops *NM* - 04/05/2010 09:28:11 AM 630 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 03:17:42 PM 1091 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line? - 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM 1025 Views
Yes. What of it? *NM* - 05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM 642 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory - 04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM 1084 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws? - 04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM 1071 Views
Re: what comments by Brandon, and what flaws? - 05/05/2010 02:34:33 AM 1216 Views
Thanks. - 05/05/2010 03:21:53 AM 1112 Views
No go. *NM* - 03/11/2010 03:14:13 AM 556 Views
Who draws it out shall follow after - 04/05/2010 12:33:56 PM 1136 Views
I don't think.... - 04/05/2010 01:22:21 PM 1020 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand - 06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM 868 Views
Indeed he did. - 06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM 1253 Views
But... - 06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM 1063 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence! - 06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM 895 Views
Well... - 06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM 1001 Views
*sigh* - 06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM 1094 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea! - 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM 1062 Views
You won't. - 06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM 1020 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic - 06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM 1129 Views
Reading comprehension issues. *NM* - 06/05/2010 02:43:28 PM 609 Views
Ah, come on, it's fun to discuss! - 06/05/2010 02:49:01 PM 935 Views
the problem there - 07/05/2010 05:45:23 AM 955 Views
more to the point - 07/05/2010 04:45:40 AM 997 Views
considering Rand won't hurt Elayne - 07/05/2010 05:46:23 AM 921 Views
wow - 06/05/2010 01:46:22 AM 1053 Views
thanks! - 06/05/2010 07:25:25 AM 874 Views
Re: thanks! - 12/05/2010 10:50:50 PM 960 Views
Nice theory ... - 07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM 1092 Views
Or Elayne could just give it to Gawyn. - 07/05/2010 07:34:44 PM 1006 Views
True, but I prefer the idea that he'll steal it because ... - 07/05/2010 08:32:29 PM 948 Views
Thanks - 08/05/2010 07:56:17 AM 940 Views
Nice! But how about.... - 12/05/2010 01:58:00 PM 1176 Views
They'll kill each other - 12/05/2010 02:22:18 PM 861 Views
Also - 12/05/2010 09:06:25 PM 978 Views
Re: Also - 12/05/2010 10:49:51 PM 961 Views
Actually - 12/05/2010 11:50:26 PM 1099 Views
Take two - 17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM 947 Views
Re: Take two - 17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM 957 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM 1011 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM 1102 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM 1030 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 03:22:37 AM 1160 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 06:32:57 AM 990 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 07:11:08 PM 872 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 10:07:36 PM 932 Views
From DomA's World Con report - 18/05/2010 10:42:48 PM 923 Views
Yeah, we knew that... - 19/05/2010 08:25:04 AM 1162 Views

Reply to Message