Active Users:1137 Time:19/12/2024 02:41:13 AM
Re: Criteria saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 11/05/2010 01:27:55 AM
I think that the list of suspects should be reviewed as well. I know the reasoning behind some exclusions was made on the "we should know by the time it happens" thing. well just because there is evidence later that supports a character doesn't mean we should dis clued them.


I think all the criteria should be addressed. Also, I think further requirements come to light
a. The person and Asmo are recognizable to eachother. Asmo's "You?" is clear. The speed of the killer's action indicates he/she knew Asmo's face because Asmo was not expected.

b. why didnt asmo see the person before he stepped thru the door/what's with this delay?
1. Asmo didnt expect to see anyone so not really looking. his guard was down.
2. the culprit was hidden somehow --naturally, chanelling or by object of the power. Had reason to hide other than ambush Asmo.
3. Asmo arrived there first. how would they get there?
4. Asmo teleported. to where? how? why?

c. Is there meaning to the way the "You?" came off as surprised?
1. Recognized the person but didnt expect him/her there.
2. Recognition of the person was based upon what they were doing.--Asmo's knowledge of someone whom he hadnt met.

d. Is there significance to the quick "No!"? Recognition is juxtaposed with understanding.

1. The killer is a person that Asmo knew would kill him immediately.

e. Is the sound of the words after death important? They hang in the air after death took him.
1. May rule out balefire b/c he died b/f he said the word. was this a RJ hint to rule out BF?
2. May rule out mundane means b/c there is no other sound made when he dies. not even an "ouch". Is the sound description an RJ hint b/c he is describing what you hear and is describing the sounds made by Asmo when he dies. How plausible is it that Asmo was stuck with a sword or such and simply continued with the Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo during and after death.

Reply to message
Asmodeans killer. - 21/03/2010 11:20:18 PM 1091 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 21/03/2010 11:51:14 PM 579 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 22/03/2010 12:01:33 AM 487 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 22/03/2010 12:27:33 AM 528 Views
Not how I learned about it. - 22/03/2010 12:46:10 AM 488 Views
Well we're not really just talking about any channeler. - 22/03/2010 12:36:53 AM 490 Views
bad examples - 22/03/2010 03:08:10 AM 476 Views
Well everyone knows - 22/03/2010 06:21:16 AM 453 Views
You are indeed right - 22/03/2010 09:35:28 AM 445 Views
Channelers aren't gods, but it only takes moments or seconds to weave for experienced channelers - 22/03/2010 02:23:02 PM 446 Views
Rand himself says... - 22/03/2010 02:47:16 PM 481 Views
Re: Rand himself says... - 22/03/2010 03:18:29 PM 422 Views
However... - 22/03/2010 03:33:50 PM 420 Views
Re: However... - 22/03/2010 04:48:08 PM 429 Views
As I always said... - 23/03/2010 09:10:14 AM 387 Views
I think Fain would be more likely. - 23/03/2010 01:48:06 PM 386 Views
Fain was always just a crackpot candidate, but RJ has ruled him out as a suspect anyway. - 23/03/2010 02:24:55 PM 418 Views
But souls have never been said to be destroyed in T'A'R - 23/03/2010 03:37:22 PM 444 Views
I think many readers would agree with your second point... - 23/03/2010 04:14:14 PM 421 Views
Re: I think many readers would agree with your second point... - 24/03/2010 12:10:14 AM 422 Views
Bashere also didn't give him a warning. - 22/03/2010 05:51:58 PM 452 Views
Rand also saw Bashere's weapon before. *NM* - 23/03/2010 09:03:31 AM 184 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 29/03/2010 11:19:43 PM 391 Views
Criteria - 08/04/2010 12:51:27 AM 382 Views
Re: Criteria - 11/05/2010 01:27:55 AM 416 Views
It was Nick cave! - 19/04/2010 10:40:44 AM 565 Views
One possibility you dont mention - 11/05/2010 01:23:26 AM 428 Views
Re: One possibility you dont mention - 11/05/2010 11:02:34 AM 416 Views
IMO... - 11/05/2010 11:31:02 AM 428 Views
Re: One possibility you dont mention - 14/05/2010 12:37:19 AM 407 Views
Re: One possibility you dont mention - 15/05/2010 09:56:28 PM 372 Views

Reply to Message