Active Users:1052 Time:13/11/2024 06:07:10 AM
According to him... Werthead Send a noteboard - 05/09/2009 09:14:44 PM
What will be interesting is if and how Sanderson's writing will change after having done the WoT novels. I think all authors change and grow during their careers. I wonder if we will be able to see "jordanesque" influences in Sanderson's future books.


His test-readers and editors have said that THE WAY OF KINGS reads much more 'Jordanesque' than his earlier novels, and this influence is a good thing.
Reply to message
This is not RJ's writing. (No Spoilers) - 05/09/2009 03:46:26 AM 1638 Views
It isn't supposed to be. - 05/09/2009 04:08:46 AM 720 Views
Jason claimed it was hard to tell them apart. *NM* - 05/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 322 Views
I take anything from that source with a pinch of salt *NM* - 05/09/2009 03:41:49 PM 280 Views
I noticed that too. - 05/09/2009 04:11:22 AM 576 Views
Re: This is not RJ's writing. (No Spoilers) - 05/09/2009 04:13:48 AM 764 Views
Absolutely not. - 05/09/2009 04:18:51 AM 1059 Views
Re: Absolutely not. - 05/09/2009 04:25:16 AM 847 Views
That's what I meant by absolutely not. - 05/09/2009 04:31:26 AM 793 Views
Could it be rough draft that Sanderson kept, and Jordan never polished? *NM* - 05/09/2009 05:14:59 AM 373 Views
I doubt it - 05/09/2009 05:17:09 AM 855 Views
Definitely Sanderson - 05/09/2009 05:27:57 AM 855 Views
Really? - 05/09/2009 08:55:37 AM 867 Views
I agree with DomA *NM* - 05/09/2009 08:26:17 PM 368 Views
Re: Absolutely not. - 05/09/2009 04:39:55 AM 946 Views
Re: Absolutely not. - 05/09/2009 04:53:12 AM 673 Views
I could tell it wasn't Jordan, but I liked what I read. - 05/09/2009 04:27:44 AM 564 Views
I liked it too...new WoT material finally! *NM* - 05/09/2009 05:16:34 AM 272 Views
It bugged me at first. - 05/09/2009 04:32:27 AM 640 Views
agreed. I liked it, but - 05/09/2009 05:13:18 AM 673 Views
Anyone want to guess which part can be a foreshadowing? - 05/09/2009 05:34:07 AM 644 Views
No surprise. Brandon was one of us when RJ stll lived *NM* - 08/09/2009 04:27:14 PM 275 Views
Nature of the beast. - 05/09/2009 06:21:05 AM 643 Views
Agreed... - 05/09/2009 06:45:09 AM 536 Views
No *sniffles* gave it away although N does tug her braid. - 05/09/2009 07:33:32 AM 571 Views
Becareful of what you wish for - 05/09/2009 08:29:52 AM 674 Views
I've been saying that for years. - 05/09/2009 08:55:19 AM 724 Views
Whatever. I thought it was an improvement. - 05/09/2009 08:45:37 PM 647 Views
Agree fully. Art and paiting have rarely even been mentioned! It feels like a fan's writing... - 05/09/2009 09:59:15 AM 741 Views
Are you pre-ordering the book? - 05/09/2009 10:48:44 AM 635 Views
I live in the U.S. now... - 05/09/2009 02:59:40 PM 630 Views
I hope so, because I won't able to wait for it. *NM* - 05/09/2009 04:45:01 PM 291 Views
I preordered it from Bookdepository.com for 15$ - 05/09/2009 04:47:07 PM 536 Views
I checked, they don't ship to India. *NM* - 05/09/2009 04:50:34 PM 301 Views
Yes, I agree. It feels cold because it is an alien presence. - 09/09/2009 02:31:45 PM 561 Views
It sounds better via the audio - 05/09/2009 03:07:37 PM 684 Views
Re: It sounds better via the audio - 05/09/2009 03:41:27 PM 570 Views
No. It was never meant to be, it never could be and Sanderson never pretended otherwise. - 05/09/2009 07:40:37 PM 762 Views
Exactly. - 05/09/2009 08:50:08 PM 589 Views
According to him... - 05/09/2009 09:14:44 PM 602 Views
It sounds more like Anderson than Jordan - 05/09/2009 11:11:58 PM 865 Views
Re: It sounds more like Anderson than Jordan - 06/09/2009 12:19:11 AM 813 Views
*NM* - 06/09/2009 12:24:16 AM 275 Views
I didn't read any of Anderson's books - 06/09/2009 12:17:54 PM 607 Views
Funniest thing ever posted on RAFO.com. Ever. *NM* - 07/09/2009 03:49:24 AM 406 Views
In it's week long history. Ever. EVER *NM* - 07/09/2009 08:12:44 AM 208 Views
It wasn't Jordan... - 07/09/2009 04:36:11 AM 568 Views
It isn't but I thought BS said he wasn't trying to be exactly like RJ - 08/09/2009 08:12:24 PM 632 Views
The difference was a bit staggering - 08/09/2009 08:23:15 PM 591 Views

Reply to Message