IMO, your arguments aren't convincing. In the end, you theory is largely based on Gawyn's announcement that he will kill Rand, while the other clues pointing to a faked death are just red herrings in your view. However, also other characters like the Forsaken, Slayer or Fain want to kill Rand. Nothing indicates why explicitely Gawyn has to be the key player to do it. If Rand really just has to die in some random way for his own good, he could even kill himself just to be ripped out of TAR by Nynaeve later (of course, this additional theory is pretty loony, too, and doesn't explain why Rand is supposed to be alive & dead at the same time). It makes rather sense to me that Gawyn will eventually realize that Rand isn't such a monster and didn't kill his mother.
Finally, as said, you pretty much ignore the images of an important funeral in many of the Prophecies in question and that – according to these Prophecies - the most important characters in this plotline besides Rand will apparently be Alivia, Rand's three girl and Logain, but not Gawyn.
Finally, as said, you pretty much ignore the images of an important funeral in many of the Prophecies in question and that – according to these Prophecies - the most important characters in this plotline besides Rand will apparently be Alivia, Rand's three girl and Logain, but not Gawyn.
My new 'loony' theory
03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM
- 2332 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here...
03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
- 1225 Views

Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though.
03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
- 1353 Views

Of course, I prefer my theory....
03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM
- 1089 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan
03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM
- 1266 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory!
03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
- 1213 Views

See, this is why I am right and you are wrong!
04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
- 1034 Views

In my view
04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM
- 970 Views
Still prejudiced, of course...
04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM
- 1085 Views
Just disagreeing
04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM
- 1060 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence.
04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM
- 1054 Views
Well...
04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM
- 955 Views
This is getting silly
04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM
- 935 Views
Yeah, I think as well that we have sufficiently exchanged our views on this matter!
*NM*
04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
- 498 Views

Re: My new 'loony' theory
03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM
- 1120 Views
cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM
- 1179 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM
- 947 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM
- 1033 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM
- 1159 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM
- 1103 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line?
05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
- 1054 Views

Yes. What of it? *NM*
05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM
- 653 Views
now you're a cool kid again?
*NM*
05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
- 594 Views

It was originally a comment on those who normally dwell here (and also did at Wotmania of course) *NM*
05/05/2010 03:25:17 AM
- 584 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM
- 1109 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws?
04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM
- 1095 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand
06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM
- 894 Views
Indeed he did.
06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM
- 1280 Views
But...
06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM
- 1093 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence!
06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM
- 923 Views
Well...
06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM
- 1028 Views
*sigh*
06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM
- 1121 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea!
06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
- 1087 Views

You won't.
06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM
- 1045 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic
06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM
- 1154 Views
Nice theory ...
07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM
- 1124 Views
Take two
17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM
- 969 Views
Re: Take two
17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM
- 983 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM
- 1042 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
- 1127 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM
- 1056 Views