Active Users:1141 Time:22/11/2024 03:23:36 PM
I agree with you Etzel - I think the unseen foe is Slayer. "Unseen" may imply operating from T'A'R *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 30/04/2010 02:40:51 PM
Is this text really authentic? If it is, the new bits about Perrin are interesting. Besides the WC, it seems there will be indeed another confrontation with Slayer (BS stated that Slayer will apear in ToM). But there also seems to be another "unseen foe" near Perrin. IMO, this could very well support my idea that Aran'gar (otherwise maybe Cyndane or Moghedien?) is now among Perrin's group and will try to manipulaze him (again via dreams liek she treid with Egwene) or eventually kill him.

However, the cover is certainly a fake, or?
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:02:14 PM 2084 Views
Re: A full picture of the US cover art and a longer synopsis - 30/04/2010 02:20:13 PM 812 Views
Hmmm... - 30/04/2010 02:28:14 PM 1153 Views
I agree with you Etzel - I think the unseen foe is Slayer. "Unseen" may imply operating from T'A'R *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:40:51 PM 289 Views
I meant that the text implies that Slayer and the unseen foe are different people. - 30/04/2010 02:49:10 PM 647 Views
Yeah, it does - 30/04/2010 03:48:25 PM 766 Views
Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 04:02:33 PM 743 Views
Re: Or, as said, the unseen foe is Aran'gar... - 30/04/2010 06:30:15 PM 776 Views
Well... - 01/05/2010 10:11:02 AM 835 Views
Ah, ok. I don't agree, then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:13:16 PM 269 Views
But... - 30/04/2010 04:16:36 PM 612 Views
Re: But... - 30/04/2010 06:01:29 PM 738 Views
I actually thought that it referred to both personalities - 30/04/2010 07:15:07 PM 866 Views
Always wanted to read a midget fantasy *NM* - 30/04/2010 02:33:52 PM 338 Views
Hm, ya. The cover is a fake. - 30/04/2010 03:34:36 PM 812 Views
I think you're right - 30/04/2010 04:59:28 PM 848 Views
It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 05:50:10 PM 879 Views
Re: It's not a fake - 30/04/2010 08:18:17 PM 623 Views
Not exactly. - 02/05/2010 01:03:13 PM 888 Views
like i replied earlier... - 02/05/2010 09:27:52 PM 642 Views
The source - 30/04/2010 03:40:40 PM 842 Views
Seems authentic then! *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:05:56 PM 314 Views
So whoever does Tor's Photoshopping is terrible at it. *NM* - 30/04/2010 10:13:22 PM 277 Views
Re: The source - 01/05/2010 12:29:00 AM 665 Views
Sweet has some serious problems with proportions of body parts... - 30/04/2010 07:11:52 PM 670 Views
Keep it, I say! - 01/05/2010 01:02:22 AM 744 Views
rofl *NM* - 01/05/2010 12:58:32 PM 289 Views
It is clearly a shitty attempt at PhotoShop. - 01/05/2010 01:46:21 AM 611 Views
On the cover - 01/05/2010 12:04:43 PM 642 Views
am I the only one reminded of that Blink 182 video ? - 01/05/2010 01:00:29 PM 835 Views

Reply to Message