Active Users:1221 Time:23/11/2024 04:38:00 AM
Nope, they deserve their bad rap for being Typical Villains of the Week including Gimmicks RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 29/04/2010 02:48:47 PM
The Forsaken act just how villains in science fiction serials, comic books and video games typically act. That is why they lose.

The major complaint about them is that they pose no direct threat to the protagonists because the author has spent almost thirteen books showing and telling us that the main characters are too important to be destroyed.

This would be a very different series if Moiraine and Lan were destroyed with a wave of Aginor's hand, if Lanfear immediately Shielded Rand and took him away to be brainwashed or if Moghedien Compelled Nynaeve and Elayne, making them her servants.

The Forsaken make very stupid mistakes, because they were not meant to be more than boogeymen. I've found that trying to explain their failures make them look even more stupid - these are people who survived by being extremely cautious and quick to eliminate threats, yet every time they have one of the main characters in their power, they gloat or knock them unconscious.

They don't really serve a purpose beyond being a rogue's gallery that will ultimately be culled and defeated so RJ never really intended for them to have a chance of winning.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Alll the incompetent Forsaken talk lately... - 29/04/2010 07:09:22 AM 1548 Views
Sammael? - 29/04/2010 08:07:24 AM 792 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 01:44:35 PM 632 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 02:50:07 PM 636 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 04:27:54 PM 705 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 05:35:03 PM 705 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 06:47:05 PM 550 Views
Sincerest apologies, the post should've been a reply... - 29/04/2010 06:52:23 PM 617 Views
Don't sweat it. It's not like we're overflowing with threads and need to cut down on the clutter. *NM* - 30/04/2010 01:52:37 AM 298 Views
Thanks for the support! =) *NM* - 01/05/2010 03:01:25 AM 257 Views
Nope, they deserve their bad rap for being Typical Villains of the Week including Gimmicks - 29/04/2010 02:48:47 PM 607 Views
I agree - 29/04/2010 02:56:55 PM 572 Views
Jordan didn't care in a 4 book series! - 29/04/2010 07:24:24 PM 679 Views
Name one bit of good nature to any of the AoL lives of the Forsaken. - 30/04/2010 01:49:53 AM 580 Views
What about Demandred? - 30/04/2010 05:12:55 AM 689 Views
D'oh! How come I didn't immediately think of a politician? Seriously? - 30/04/2010 12:45:35 PM 724 Views
What is your argument? - 30/04/2010 06:12:24 PM 599 Views
Indeed - 01/05/2010 09:35:06 AM 630 Views
Except LTT DID do good. You know, saving the world from the Dark One and all. He was good. QED - 01/05/2010 05:06:31 PM 564 Views
and Demandred fought the Shadow for half the war... what's the point? - 01/05/2010 09:20:00 PM 630 Views
You can do good without being good. It's mostly the system's fault (credit? ) - 01/05/2010 11:30:16 PM 588 Views
How do you judge people, if not by their actions? - 02/05/2010 06:29:16 AM 627 Views
Hair, taste in clothes, and sense of humor. Faile wins! *NM* - 02/05/2010 06:38:08 AM 257 Views
Faile has bad hair *NM* - 03/05/2010 05:06:23 AM 266 Views
To some extent, there was no evil since they lived in Utopia, - 30/04/2010 07:08:32 AM 630 Views
The WoT does NOT feature a "small set of characters" - 03/05/2010 12:06:56 AM 533 Views
I kinda thought most of those points were in what I already wrote - 03/05/2010 02:53:04 AM 507 Views
Re: Alll the incompetent Forsaken talk lately... - 30/04/2010 02:44:06 AM 563 Views
I agree with a few of your points - 30/04/2010 07:24:59 AM 625 Views
Re: I agree with a few of your points - 01/05/2010 01:13:03 AM 912 Views
someone recently posted audio to the Budapest? signing RJ did - 01/05/2010 03:00:56 AM 555 Views

Reply to Message