Active Users:689 Time:23/12/2024 02:34:33 PM
Did they? RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 28/04/2010 12:52:04 PM
I think I remember people talking about how shortening the turnaround to five or six months led to the drop-off in quality that we saw in the latter part of the series. I don't recall any that were turned around in three to four months, though I could well be missing something. I hope I'm wrong.
Reply to message
Sanderson's ToM deadline - 27/04/2010 01:20:10 AM 1170 Views
Hmmm looks like a early 2011 release *NM* - 27/04/2010 04:00:30 AM 272 Views
Re: Sanderson's ToM deadline - 27/04/2010 06:15:37 AM 762 Views
Depends on the turnaround Tor gives it *NM* - 27/04/2010 06:32:23 PM 205 Views
Right. Is there any precedent for a three-month turnaround? *NM* - 27/04/2010 07:21:12 PM 214 Views
*shrugs* - 27/04/2010 08:12:04 PM 551 Views
Tor published RJ books with equally short turn-arounds; but this may be different *NM* - 28/04/2010 12:20:46 AM 227 Views
Did they? - 28/04/2010 12:52:04 PM 569 Views
Re: Did they? - 28/04/2010 01:48:27 PM 529 Views
Macmillan announces it to bookstores for October 26 in its fall 2010 trade catalogue - 30/04/2010 03:56:42 PM 479 Views
Sanderson also noted last night that ToM is currently "on schedule," whatever that means. *NM* - 30/04/2010 04:06:37 PM 211 Views
Yeah... - 30/04/2010 04:14:22 PM 470 Views

Reply to Message