Active Users:749 Time:24/02/2025 02:00:32 PM
Re: More change? Kieran Send a noteboard - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM
From what? To what?

I thought it simply meant every turning was unique, not that it was consistently heading towards or away from something?


I'll try to find the quote. It basically says that each turning can have a little more flexibility to how things happen.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1324 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 938 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 709 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 821 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 791 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 747 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 682 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 330 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 655 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 707 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 741 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 669 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 832 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 711 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 654 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 692 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 683 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 677 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 735 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 688 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 691 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 359 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 657 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 328 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 387 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 731 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 637 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 669 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 981 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 677 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 786 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1114 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 708 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 700 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 747 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 813 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 752 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 710 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 657 Views

Reply to Message