Active Users:597 Time:05/11/2024 02:20:28 PM
It's reversed... Etzel Send a noteboard - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM
... what with the 'Master Underhill' joke. That a copy survived two to three Ages is unbelievable enough :P.


Tolkien used the name "Master Underhill", because he knew the WoT myth. ;)
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1218 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 864 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 630 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 738 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 706 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 667 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 604 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 305 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 580 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 656 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 653 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 582 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 746 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 632 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 574 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 603 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 597 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 598 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 651 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 607 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 609 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 326 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 579 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 296 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 355 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 655 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 561 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 594 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 889 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 606 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 714 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1034 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 657 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 627 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 667 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 729 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 672 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 631 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 578 Views

Reply to Message