Active Users:338 Time:13/04/2025 02:30:53 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* Etzel Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM
It may be logical for humans with a limited lifespan, but for a being with the ability to be everywhere at once, exist at all times at once and etc., finding the "Beginning" is not so simple. That's the whole point of the Ouroboros spiral - there is no start and there is no end; the conceptions are one and the same to such a being.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... mazza3 - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1347 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... GateKeeper - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 954 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... Kieran - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 724 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 838 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... DomA - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 805 Views
Difficult to see how you can refer to a billion people as a "fringe"... *NM* Shannow - 22/04/2010 05:02:08 PM 361 Views
You really think half of all christians believe that Earth is only 3000 years old? *NM* Japhy - 23/04/2010 12:35:01 AM 368 Views
Last I've heard, the majority of Christians weren't fundamentalists DomA - 23/04/2010 01:54:04 PM 712 Views
How about "living on the fringe of reality"? *NM* Marshall - 24/04/2010 10:21:17 PM 362 Views
That's not entirely right Etzel - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 767 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 699 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* Etzel - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 338 Views
I don't think so. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 673 Views
No, the point is... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 724 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 755 Views
The question is... Etzel - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 684 Views
I agree with FT RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 849 Views
Well, maybe. Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 727 Views
Doesn't make sense Etzel - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 671 Views
Why? Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 710 Views
Ok File Leader - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 701 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... Etzel - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 693 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 753 Views
Yeah... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 702 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 713 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* Etzel - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 364 Views
Yes and no... Fanatic-Templar - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 674 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* Etzel - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 335 Views
True that. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 392 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. Kieran - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 745 Views
More change? Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 654 Views
Re: More change? Kieran - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 684 Views
On the Ages... Etzel - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 996 Views
Re: On the Ages... Kieran - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 697 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 799 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... ursidae - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1130 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... gjjfh - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 722 Views
Can't be... Etzel - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 719 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 762 Views
It's reversed... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 833 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 770 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* Etzel - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 722 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. Fanatic-Templar - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 673 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes