Active Users:1283 Time:23/11/2024 06:35:59 AM
I don't know but perhaps if we think hard enough, the two of us, The Shrike Send a noteboard - 20/04/2010 03:26:35 AM
I liked the 4th/5th Doctor's Tardis interiors much better. Much more minimalistic.



Seriously...what it up with the whole steampunk revolution? I am not a fan whatsoever.


we can make it go away. Or at least not see its brutish, unfinished ugliness.
Reply to message
I'm sorry, but I just have to ask this... - 19/04/2010 10:42:23 AM 718 Views
I dislike its Steampunk interior. - 19/04/2010 12:35:21 PM 416 Views
Re: I dislike its Steampunk interior. - 19/04/2010 06:08:26 PM 471 Views
I don't know but perhaps if we think hard enough, the two of us, - 20/04/2010 03:26:35 AM 422 Views
his feature do have a certain undefined caste to them - 19/04/2010 06:45:06 PM 395 Views
He is actually doing rather well so far. - 19/04/2010 07:18:58 PM 415 Views
Two parter! *NM* - 20/04/2010 03:26:58 AM 181 Views
I like him quite a bit actually - 19/04/2010 07:39:05 PM 398 Views
I like him more and more. - 20/04/2010 08:37:45 PM 415 Views
Re: I like him more and more. - 22/04/2010 04:43:05 AM 587 Views
Re: I like him more and more. - 23/04/2010 11:19:36 AM 372 Views
That you don't know Star Trek... - 23/04/2010 11:28:05 AM 417 Views
Re: That you don't know Star Trek... - 23/04/2010 11:30:12 AM 387 Views
Not even The Next Genertion? - 23/04/2010 11:32:34 AM 404 Views
Re: Not even The Next Genertion? - 23/04/2010 11:47:09 AM 407 Views
I like her much more than Sisko - 24/04/2010 11:35:32 PM 386 Views
I wouldn't be surprised if it's less to do with the new TARDIS "bedding down" and more... - 21/04/2010 11:04:02 PM 406 Views
They show more than one room, now? - 22/04/2010 04:35:14 AM 461 Views
No, but... - 22/04/2010 10:40:57 AM 468 Views
Ah, I didn't notice that - 23/04/2010 09:56:04 AM 390 Views
The wardrobe's seen when Tennant's searching for his own clothes too. - 24/04/2010 10:48:08 PM 504 Views
Yeah, I just noticed that yesterday. "Watching" the commentary - 24/04/2010 11:30:50 PM 387 Views

Reply to Message