I mean regular picture quality is good. I've never in my life complained about it. Then, something is introduced as "must have" that is hardly noticeable unless they're side by side...
I sort of agree with you but...

There's a bigger gap in picture quality between the raw movie files as we see them in production on very pricey monitors vs. HDTV/Blue Ray than there is between SD and HD TV at home, and there's even less a difference between DVD (especially plugged in with HDMI or component cables) and Blue-Ray. For a while whem the format was new we used to get BR discs for reference material, but most studios have stopped doing that and reverted to using HD QT files or other non-domestic file formats for that.
This message last edited by DomA on 07/04/2010 at 12:49:42 AM
Lord of The Rings Trilogy on Bluray
06/04/2010 05:31:53 PM
- 1343 Views
What, because people are going to buy them on Bluray after already having them on DVD?
06/04/2010 06:09:44 PM
- 768 Views
but you might get a ring! *NM*
07/04/2010 03:01:44 AM
- 341 Views
Girls
07/04/2010 10:51:50 AM
- 796 Views

I think Blu-Ray &HD is the biggest rip off since peanut butter and jelly got put into jars together.
06/04/2010 06:14:26 PM
- 782 Views
Then you either need a new TV or new glasses...
06/04/2010 07:19:53 PM
- 810 Views
Re: Then you either need a new TV or new glasses...
06/04/2010 08:50:49 PM
- 769 Views
Re: Then you either need a new TV or new glasses...
07/04/2010 12:47:11 AM
- 783 Views
penaut butter and jam come together in jars now? really? that's hilarious *NM*
06/04/2010 06:17:46 PM
- 316 Views
The question is
06/04/2010 09:02:15 PM
- 830 Views
You know...
06/04/2010 09:23:57 PM
- 1216 Views
AFD?
06/04/2010 09:26:53 PM
- 750 Views
The first movie is forgivable
07/04/2010 04:57:41 AM
- 799 Views
The third has enough moments of lameness to make me not like it overmuch.
08/04/2010 09:37:11 PM
- 713 Views