Active Users:774 Time:03/04/2025 05:05:25 AM
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... Avendesora Send a noteboard - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM
Ever since we've "seen" Jacob, he has creeped me out. I don't know who creeps me out more. Smokey/UnLocke or Jacob.

Good episode. Jack did not annoy me this time.
*MySmiley*

I believe all news and research that supports my opinion, and dismiss the rest as conspiracy and lies.
Reply to message
Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 12:58:58 PM 802 Views
Great episode! - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM 469 Views
Re: Great episode! - 24/02/2010 03:45:55 PM 456 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 03:59:28 PM 540 Views
This episode was very subtle.... - 24/02/2010 04:06:28 PM 525 Views
I checked for the tattoo - 24/02/2010 07:55:48 PM 451 Views
Re Kate and Aaron - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM 459 Views
So what's up with next week's episode? - 24/02/2010 05:00:45 PM 500 Views
You know I really love this show but... - 25/02/2010 12:20:36 AM 470 Views
That actually was kinda (unintentionally) funny. *NM* - 26/02/2010 05:58:03 PM 167 Views
I wouldn't call Claire the new Rousseau. They're actually opposite. - 25/02/2010 12:27:19 AM 524 Views
Agreed - 25/02/2010 03:16:11 AM 445 Views
Christian and Locke. - 25/02/2010 10:54:30 AM 400 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 03:23:47 AM 457 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 12:20:53 PM 494 Views
Kate Austen was on the lighthouse dial as number 51, not crossed off. - 25/02/2010 12:45:15 PM 437 Views
Other numbers: - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM 427 Views
Interesting that name 108 on the dial is Wallace. Possibly a shoutout to David Wallace? - 26/02/2010 12:22:26 AM 438 Views
Could be. Are the writers fans of The Office? - 26/02/2010 03:24:53 PM 424 Views
Without reading dial, I thought it might be Walt. - 04/03/2010 06:11:04 PM 418 Views
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM 453 Views
A question not addressed.... - 27/02/2010 03:26:29 PM 501 Views
Nope - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM 491 Views

Reply to Message