Active Users:1154 Time:22/11/2024 05:37:50 PM
Other numbers: smaug Send a noteboard - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM
<img src="http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/5776/kate51.jpg" />


I tried to make out who was on 108, since where Hurley was "supposed" to turn the wheel, but it looks like a crossed-out "Wallace", which doesn't ring any bells. 109 says "Friendly" though. Heh.

Also, 20 was a crossed-out Rousseau.
Neutral Observer
Reply to message
Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 12:58:58 PM 746 Views
Great episode! - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM 411 Views
Re: Great episode! - 24/02/2010 03:45:55 PM 402 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 03:59:28 PM 480 Views
This episode was very subtle.... - 24/02/2010 04:06:28 PM 467 Views
I checked for the tattoo - 24/02/2010 07:55:48 PM 391 Views
Re Kate and Aaron - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM 403 Views
So what's up with next week's episode? - 24/02/2010 05:00:45 PM 434 Views
You know I really love this show but... - 25/02/2010 12:20:36 AM 406 Views
That actually was kinda (unintentionally) funny. *NM* - 26/02/2010 05:58:03 PM 138 Views
I wouldn't call Claire the new Rousseau. They're actually opposite. - 25/02/2010 12:27:19 AM 471 Views
Agreed - 25/02/2010 03:16:11 AM 388 Views
Christian and Locke. - 25/02/2010 10:54:30 AM 350 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 03:23:47 AM 405 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 12:20:53 PM 434 Views
Kate Austen was on the lighthouse dial as number 51, not crossed off. - 25/02/2010 12:45:15 PM 379 Views
Other numbers: - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM 364 Views
Interesting that name 108 on the dial is Wallace. Possibly a shoutout to David Wallace? - 26/02/2010 12:22:26 AM 373 Views
Could be. Are the writers fans of The Office? - 26/02/2010 03:24:53 PM 369 Views
Without reading dial, I thought it might be Walt. - 04/03/2010 06:11:04 PM 361 Views
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM 401 Views
A question not addressed.... - 27/02/2010 03:26:29 PM 437 Views
Nope - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM 437 Views

Reply to Message