Active Users:1108 Time:22/11/2024 05:30:20 PM
Re Kate and Aaron Mark Send a noteboard - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM
When they were off trying to track Sawyer didn't Kate tell Jin about Aaron when Jin asked her why she came back to the Island? She defiantly said something about wanting to find Claire.
Once known as Hochopepa

You cannot kill a vampire with an MDF stake; werewolves can't fly; zombies do not run. - Simon Pegg
Reply to message
Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 12:58:58 PM 746 Views
Great episode! - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM 411 Views
Re: Great episode! - 24/02/2010 03:45:55 PM 402 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 03:59:28 PM 480 Views
This episode was very subtle.... - 24/02/2010 04:06:28 PM 467 Views
I checked for the tattoo - 24/02/2010 07:55:48 PM 391 Views
Re Kate and Aaron - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM 403 Views
So what's up with next week's episode? - 24/02/2010 05:00:45 PM 434 Views
You know I really love this show but... - 25/02/2010 12:20:36 AM 406 Views
That actually was kinda (unintentionally) funny. *NM* - 26/02/2010 05:58:03 PM 138 Views
I wouldn't call Claire the new Rousseau. They're actually opposite. - 25/02/2010 12:27:19 AM 470 Views
Agreed - 25/02/2010 03:16:11 AM 388 Views
Christian and Locke. - 25/02/2010 10:54:30 AM 350 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 03:23:47 AM 405 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 12:20:53 PM 434 Views
Kate Austen was on the lighthouse dial as number 51, not crossed off. - 25/02/2010 12:45:15 PM 379 Views
Other numbers: - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM 363 Views
Interesting that name 108 on the dial is Wallace. Possibly a shoutout to David Wallace? - 26/02/2010 12:22:26 AM 372 Views
Could be. Are the writers fans of The Office? - 26/02/2010 03:24:53 PM 369 Views
Without reading dial, I thought it might be Walt. - 04/03/2010 06:11:04 PM 361 Views
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM 401 Views
A question not addressed.... - 27/02/2010 03:26:29 PM 436 Views
Nope - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM 437 Views

Reply to Message