Active Users:331 Time:03/04/2025 10:53:13 PM
5 Reasons not to freak out about this ironclad Send a noteboard - 03/09/2009 01:11:22 PM
1. Disney owns Miramax. The pseudo-indie isn't what it was when the Weinsteins were introducing mainstream America to indie edge in the 90s, sure. But Disney has owned the studio even since those days-- Pulp Fiction was released by Miramax when it was owned by Disney, for Christ's sake. Clearly this is a studio unafraid of edge when cordoned off in the proper sector.

2. Disney owns Pixar. The animation geeks were freaking out when this merger happened in 2006. But you know what's happened since then? Ratatouille, Wall-E and Up, plus a ton of money to make more movies like that by selling Cars-themed bedspreads to 5-year-old boys. Instead of curbing John Lasseter's vision, they put him in charge of all animation. Clearly this is a studio unafraid of creative license.

3. Disney knows from marketing. I mean, duh. If you think Iron Man and Spider-Man action figures are ubiquitous now, just wait until they come under the watch of the people who have made sure that every girl under the age of 10 has a Hannah Montana-themed something. Just like it was for Pixar, this isn't inherently a bad thing. Kids need toys and kids love the characters and more toys mean more storytelling opportunities for just those characters. Clearly this is a studio unafraid to make a bunch of money on ancillary stuff and spend it perpetuating the cycle.

4. Disney really wants boys to pay attention. This may be the biggest reason of all to hold your horses. With the exception of Cars, Disney hasn't really been able to tap into a young boy market, and they really have no cachet among teens. There's no way they would scare off Marvel's core fanbase of teen boys by cleaning up Tony Stark or toning down the action in Spider-Man. Not that those two characters will be under Disney any time soon-- Paramount and Sony are still hanging on to their respective deals-- but I guarantee they'll be using that model going forward with whichever Marvel character is up at the plate next. Clearly this is a studio well aware that you, the fanboy, are their golden calf, and you will not be sacrificed.

5. Disney still has John Lasseter. This really just applies to the spectre of straight-to-DVD animated Iron Man adventures, in which Tony Stark fights Tinkerbell or some nonsense. As head of Disney Animation, Lasseter has done away with that crappy treatment of Disney's characters. While there will likely be a lot more Marvel character animation, apparently much of it on the Disney XD channel, don't expect it to be as miserable as the fates that befell The Little Mermaid and Jafar in the 90s. Clearly this is a studio with more respect for its characters than it used to have.

As I said above, I agree, actually.
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
The source
Reply to message
The World has come to an end! Disney is buying Marvel - 31/08/2009 04:09:24 PM 1036 Views
Nonononononononononononononono. - 31/08/2009 04:12:57 PM 669 Views
You have got to be kidding. *NM* - 31/08/2009 04:13:59 PM 311 Views
Yeah, I saw that, too. Weird. *NM* - 31/08/2009 04:27:41 PM 346 Views
I don't think this bodes well for the future of Marvel - 31/08/2009 04:34:17 PM 615 Views
Re: I don't think this bodes well for the future of Marvel - 31/08/2009 04:47:00 PM 908 Views
Re: I don't think this bodes well for the future of Marvel - 31/08/2009 04:51:50 PM 634 Views
Please list one thing Dinsey has "ruined" after purchasing it. - 02/09/2009 04:13:50 AM 657 Views
That was just my gut reaction to it in all honesty.... - 02/09/2009 07:30:44 AM 573 Views
I hope I didn't come across as being nasty about it. - 04/09/2009 03:09:55 AM 623 Views
Nope, not at all - 08/09/2009 08:24:29 AM 688 Views
I'd better still get my Deadpool movie, dammit! *NM* - 31/08/2009 06:19:02 PM 327 Views
I doubt that they're going to have Hannah Montana star in the Wonder Woman movie or anything. - 31/08/2009 06:47:40 PM 664 Views
Of course they wouldn't! - 31/08/2009 06:54:37 PM 702 Views
Sorry, I'm not a comic book nerd. *NM* - 31/08/2009 07:20:21 PM 345 Views
You say that like it's a bad thing. *NM* - 01/09/2009 12:48:42 AM 322 Views
She'd make a better Storm, honestly. *NM* - 31/08/2009 07:13:05 PM 290 Views
Yeah, but come on. Who wouldn't? *NM* - 31/08/2009 08:25:22 PM 279 Views
I wonder if Bruce Campbell would do it... *NM* - 01/09/2009 06:56:04 AM 285 Views
I would love to see a Disney take on Deadpool - 31/08/2009 07:43:53 PM 702 Views
Fox still have the rights to any Deadpool movie *NM* - 01/09/2009 10:54:14 AM 350 Views
*Chokes* - 31/08/2009 07:57:34 PM 668 Views
OMG this can't be true. *NM* - 31/08/2009 09:07:00 PM 388 Views
It's a deal made with the Dark One! - 31/08/2009 10:01:00 PM 735 Views
Miramax is Disney. Pulp Fiction is Miramax. PF contained anal rape - 31/08/2009 10:48:28 PM 751 Views
Was Miramax owned by Disney at that time? *NM* - 01/09/2009 12:47:54 AM 306 Views
Yes, since 93 *NM* - 01/09/2009 10:46:09 AM 337 Views
You guys are a bunch of nerds. - 02/09/2009 04:12:39 AM 700 Views
It's already begun, you guys. - 03/09/2009 05:32:50 AM 842 Views
Ha! Funny. *NM* - 04/09/2009 03:10:57 AM 331 Views
5 Reasons not to freak out about this - 03/09/2009 01:11:22 PM 771 Views
You think it can get worse than Spider-Man 3? - 07/09/2009 10:13:24 AM 676 Views
I liked Spider-Man 3. *NM* - 07/09/2009 06:30:10 PM 331 Views
My biggest problem with it... - 07/09/2009 08:10:47 PM 640 Views
Oh yeah, I won't deny there were problems with it. - 08/09/2009 06:21:21 AM 640 Views
How it should have ended: - 08/09/2009 06:17:26 PM 753 Views
"Fly away, little bird! No sand mutation for you tonight!" - 08/09/2009 06:35:46 PM 739 Views
Nice. *NM* - 08/09/2009 07:52:15 PM 326 Views

Reply to Message