And it is pretty damn close to that.
From historical records, true or not true. I must concur with Ghavrel on all his points.
and that was hardly historical accuracy. I guess that was all Arok was saying.
Spartacus: Blood and Sand starts this week...on Starz...but who's going to watch?
19/01/2010 12:07:46 AM
- 567 Views
Rome and 300 really shouldn't ever be put in the same sentence.
19/01/2010 01:20:16 AM
- 422 Views
You are mistaken. Both films/shows were close to their source material..
19/01/2010 02:29:00 AM
- 409 Views
I am not mistaken. The assumption that the source material is correct is inane.
19/01/2010 05:23:20 AM
- 489 Views
The source of 300 is the graphic novel, not history
19/01/2010 11:35:59 AM
- 443 Views
And the graphic novels gets its source material/distorts its source material from where?
19/01/2010 04:58:30 PM
- 423 Views
The question is what the film aimed to be
19/01/2010 07:45:18 PM
- 420 Views
It aimed to be shit. And it succeeded.
19/01/2010 10:55:57 PM
- 408 Views
And, as I said, that places it in a much lower league of quality than ROME, which was very accurate. *NM*
20/01/2010 04:17:57 AM
- 180 Views
You do realize that the Graphic Novel is a work of fiction, right?
20/01/2010 05:24:27 PM
- 398 Views
300 is deliberately supposed to be non-historical, but this message got lost somewhere along the way
21/01/2010 01:47:50 AM
- 426 Views
That was such a stupid potential argument that I gave him the benefit of the doubt and discarded it.
20/01/2010 04:17:10 AM
- 380 Views
Sounds good, as long as it doesn't look like Xena or Hercules *NM*
19/01/2010 11:34:23 AM
- 181 Views
I'll watch it for the soft core porn value. Full frontal male nudity! The gays will love it.
19/01/2010 05:00:27 PM
- 407 Views