Active Users:1109 Time:22/11/2024 09:05:36 PM
Rome and 300 really shouldn't ever be put in the same sentence. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 19/01/2010 01:20:16 AM
One was a respectably accurate retelling of political turmoil, with a few embellishments where sources aren't revealing about characters. The other was a complete fabrication tenuously based on a battle.

This looks like the latter, which is very unfortunate. :(
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Spartacus: Blood and Sand starts this week...on Starz...but who's going to watch? - 19/01/2010 12:07:46 AM 569 Views
It sounds cool ... too bad I only have basic cable. - 19/01/2010 01:15:54 AM 396 Views
Rome and 300 really shouldn't ever be put in the same sentence. - 19/01/2010 01:20:16 AM 423 Views
You are mistaken. Both films/shows were close to their source material.. - 19/01/2010 02:29:00 AM 409 Views
I am not mistaken. The assumption that the source material is correct is inane. - 19/01/2010 05:23:20 AM 490 Views
The source of 300 is the graphic novel, not history - 19/01/2010 11:35:59 AM 443 Views
That was such a stupid potential argument that I gave him the benefit of the doubt and discarded it. - 20/01/2010 04:17:10 AM 380 Views
Why are you guys getting so worked up about this? - 20/01/2010 11:37:53 AM 386 Views
I enjoyed watching 300. - 20/01/2010 09:22:11 PM 416 Views
Sounds good, as long as it doesn't look like Xena or Hercules *NM* - 19/01/2010 11:34:23 AM 181 Views
How much skin does she show? *NM* - 19/01/2010 02:28:55 PM 180 Views
*points* the only relevant reply to this post *NM* - 20/01/2010 06:50:32 PM 197 Views

Reply to Message