It was supposed to say lung capacity but sorry no matter how much it disagrees with the modern feminist world view males are just simply better athletes and the contest isn't really that close. The Williams sisters, who are considered two of the top female athletes of their generation, were beaten in back to matches by a male player who was ranked 203. It wasn't even close, they lost by a combined score of 12-3. The marines just did a study of all male units vs 1/3 female units and the mixed units unperformed in nearly every category including combat firing range and the did while suffer a much higher injury rate and moved slower. Did stop Obama from integrating combat roles but what can you expect from a him and his secretary defense neither of which have spent a day in uniform and believe they should follow their heart instead of science and reason.

There are some thing females exceed males at but athletics and combat are just not it. Men pay a price for that we don't live as long and are more susceptible to diseases. We also have less patience and poor impulse control. That is why so many more of end up in prison.

What is meaningless is point out the very rare female is a strong as the average male when there are no females that even come close to the strongest males. You hypothetical female cyclist would have more red blood cells than the average female but would probably still have less than the average male. Exercise doesn't have that much of an impact. But either way should loses to a good male cyclist

The Adam Driver comment is good though. You describe him as skinning and unimposing but look at picture of him without a shirt on. If you gave them frame and that muscle mass to Daisy Ridley then Ronda Rousey would be scared to step in the ring with her. That is how different physical strength is between the human males and human females.

What makes me think dimorphism is static? The question is so bizarre I don't know where to start. Do you disagree with the idea the on average guys are bigger than girls? There is reality and there is crazy shit people believe because they want it to be true. Boys are bigger and stronger than girls and it has nothing to with genetics and everything to do with how we evolved. Look at the Chimpanzee, they have the same differences in size and strength between males and females. You are correct that social pressure and genetics are what caused this but it is hard wired into our DNA not any silly hair brained crap about how little girls are raised vs how lite boys are raised. It how the evolutionary pressure to mate within the social primate social network rewarded changes and in male vs females to increase the odds to breed and have offspring that could live to breeding age.

Sorry but your wrong yet again. Evolution does design it just does it without intent. If you have a better word please offer it up almost any word will imply intent. Evolution has to intent and it doesn't have to ability to care, not even about things like equality. The male black widow got the short end of the equality stick and evolution doesn't care.

It can be change. Just inject load of testosterone at and you can start to build muscle mass like a man. That is how we do it but we get it from our glands.

Most everyone has the potential to be strong than they are but females have much less potential. It takes more work for females to build muscle mass then men and they can build as much. There is a reason body builders inject testosterone and not estrogen.

The misguided belief of our brainwashed youth that females can be physically as powerful is the reason we should be cheering ourselves to make these fantasy badass characters. If you some guy beat the shit out of another guy there is not a lot of judgment because they are both guys. If accept you idea that females have the potential to be as physically powerful as men then we should take the same attitude when a I guy beat a women. I think that is a bad idea because unlike math with guys are only slightly better on average than girls the bell curves barely touch when comes to hurting other people with your fist.

Because force is a factor I don't really have a problem with female jedi. My complaints about her power level were do to her being a neophyte not if she stands to sit to pee. The idea that size and physical strength do not matter with the with the force is well established. In fact I liked that the idea of female jedi. My issue was with making the male character weaker which is the same approach was saw with the feminist propaganda piece Fury Road.

As for fighting with sword gender would matter again because in sword fighting strength and quickness matter almost as much as they do in fist fighting, maybe even more. In Viking mythology shield maidens may have been all the rage but in reality it was guys coming off those boats and terrorizing Europe.

Feminist seem more than happy to accept that females are better at some things then guys are but they just can't seem to admit that some things guys are better at even one there really is no room for logical argument. I can see how they can keep clinging to the idea that women are as good as men when it comes to leadership, more personal experience says no but there are arguments to made. We it comes to math even though science heavily points toward a male advantage I can see stubbornly clinging on when it comes to pure physical ability you have to hook up the Kool-Aid IV to by into that.

The funny thing is in the modern world that is no where that advantage it used to be. Sure I can beat up my wife but that doesn't help me get my way. Sure knows I would never do and if tried I would go to jail and lose my family.

My mom is one of the strongest people I know and I am fairly certain she has never beaten up anyone in her life.