Came across an excellent review with some interesting analysis
Legolas Send a noteboard - 27/01/2013 10:17:06 PM
Written by a woman who's apparently published a book on the LotR movie adaptations and has long been working on another about LotR as a book. It's a more positive review than many, perhaps, but she makes her points well and has some interesting analysis of the pacing and division of screentime between action scenes and "quiet" scenes.
The Hobbit - Discussion thread and first thoughts
13/12/2012 12:21:52 AM
- 2358 Views
As for the 3D...
13/12/2012 04:18:43 PM
- 1158 Views
I wouldn't call it a rash - more like chafing.
14/12/2012 04:36:42 PM
- 1045 Views
I think two words have killed this movie for me: "orc nemesis"
15/12/2012 02:00:33 AM
- 1028 Views
To be fair, it's an orc nemesis from the books.
15/12/2012 07:23:16 PM
- 1044 Views
Wait are we talking about Azog here?
16/12/2012 01:08:11 AM
- 997 Views
Looks like it.
16/12/2012 12:19:19 PM
- 912 Views
There was not an orc nemesis in the books
16/12/2012 01:55:59 PM
- 884 Views
There actually was in Tolkein's mind, it is just contained in a different book. *NM*
28/12/2012 02:37:13 PM
- 446 Views
If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal
09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM
- 899 Views
I hated it, but I know I will be in the minority.
28/12/2012 02:45:26 PM
- 963 Views
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?"
09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM
- 936 Views
Radagast? Bunny Sledge? Archrival Azog? The whole goblin cavern scene? It's a massacre alright. *NM*
11/01/2013 03:07:55 PM
- 522 Views
i actually liked the stone giant fight, that was part of the book which i appreciated in the film
08/01/2013 09:47:18 PM
- 1012 Views
Came across an excellent review with some interesting analysis
27/01/2013 10:17:06 PM
- 1020 Views