Or it would if he weren't a useless whining moron, anyway.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 09/01/2013 05:33:16 PM
It doesn't really change the story, and it makes for a better movie.
If you're going to go to the trouble of expanding the almost non-existent Orcish vocabulary that Tolkien left (and grammar, no doubt), you could at least use it for something less vapid than empty not remotely scary threats and whining about inadequate underlings.
As it is, I'm going to have to say it would've been a better movie without him, and without the Orcs talking in Orcish. The Goblin King was much better.
The Hobbit - Discussion thread and first thoughts
13/12/2012 12:21:52 AM
- 2342 Views
As for the 3D...
13/12/2012 04:18:43 PM
- 1144 Views
I wouldn't call it a rash - more like chafing.
14/12/2012 04:36:42 PM
- 1030 Views
I think two words have killed this movie for me: "orc nemesis"
15/12/2012 02:00:33 AM
- 1014 Views
To be fair, it's an orc nemesis from the books.
15/12/2012 07:23:16 PM
- 1029 Views
Wait are we talking about Azog here?
16/12/2012 01:08:11 AM
- 981 Views
Looks like it.
16/12/2012 12:19:19 PM
- 899 Views
There was not an orc nemesis in the books
16/12/2012 01:55:59 PM
- 870 Views
There actually was in Tolkein's mind, it is just contained in a different book. *NM*
28/12/2012 02:37:13 PM
- 439 Views
If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal
09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM
- 889 Views
Or it would if he weren't a useless whining moron, anyway.
09/01/2013 05:33:16 PM
- 907 Views
I hated it, but I know I will be in the minority.
28/12/2012 02:45:26 PM
- 947 Views
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?"
09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM
- 927 Views
Radagast? Bunny Sledge? Archrival Azog? The whole goblin cavern scene? It's a massacre alright. *NM*
11/01/2013 03:07:55 PM
- 519 Views
i actually liked the stone giant fight, that was part of the book which i appreciated in the film
08/01/2013 09:47:18 PM
- 999 Views