Active Users:2867 Time:22/01/2025 07:32:34 PM
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?" beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM
For example, the troll scene. The troll scene in the book is short, and kind of silly. If it was transcribed word by word into the movie, it would have been a three-minute scene. I think the movie kept the right balance of silly/threatening for the troll scene.

Rivendale? In the book, the dwarves go to Rivendale, relax for a while, and then leave. Is that more interesting than what the movie did?

Not sure what you mean about screwing up personalities and capabilities. In the books, the dwarves other than Thorin have pretty much zero personality, other than Bombur being "the fat one." Capabilities? Surely you don't mean the dwarves, right? In the book, the dwarves pretty much scurry from scene to scene, constantly being captured or threatened.

I can definitely appreciate you talking about filler- I think the movie could have been cut down another half hour without losing anything- but I don't think it's such a massacre of the book as you're making out.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
The Hobbit - Discussion thread and first thoughts - 13/12/2012 12:21:52 AM 2394 Views
As for the 3D... - 13/12/2012 04:18:43 PM 1188 Views
Please get everyone to stop watching movies in 3D in Europe. - 15/12/2012 02:02:40 AM 1053 Views
You overestimate my influence on the people of Europe - 17/12/2012 11:08:06 AM 1073 Views
Re: As for the 3D... - 08/01/2013 09:25:43 PM 1150 Views
Re: As for the 3D... - 09/01/2013 09:13:27 AM 1083 Views
I wouldn't call it a rash - more like chafing. - 14/12/2012 04:36:42 PM 1067 Views
Ouch - comparing it to Crystal Skull? *NM* - 15/12/2012 02:02:00 AM 488 Views
Well, the trolls were Moe, Larry and Curly, so... *NM* - 15/12/2012 02:15:19 AM 490 Views
I liked it. There are some nitpicks, but overall it is enjoyable - 14/12/2012 04:50:28 PM 979 Views
A bit too silly and special effects driven. - 14/12/2012 11:10:48 PM 1054 Views
Agreed. - 23/12/2012 12:32:23 AM 1060 Views
I think two words have killed this movie for me: "orc nemesis" - 15/12/2012 02:00:33 AM 1059 Views
To be fair, it's an orc nemesis from the books. - 15/12/2012 07:23:16 PM 1066 Views
Wait are we talking about Azog here? - 16/12/2012 01:08:11 AM 1020 Views
Looks like it. - 16/12/2012 12:19:19 PM 938 Views
There was not an orc nemesis in the books - 16/12/2012 01:55:59 PM 902 Views
Actually, they might have already screwed up the Thrain thing. - 19/12/2012 01:47:38 AM 1094 Views
I feel robed from my dreams. - 21/12/2012 07:57:30 PM 918 Views
If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal - 09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM 918 Views
Or it would if he weren't a useless whining moron, anyway. - 09/01/2013 05:33:16 PM 946 Views
Should have been edited down to 2 hours - 15/12/2012 11:05:29 AM 978 Views
Commercial, forgettable but enjoyable - 15/12/2012 11:42:53 AM 949 Views
It was fun, but it was also weird. - 16/12/2012 08:50:54 AM 931 Views
Better Nate than lever *NM* *NM* - 23/12/2012 11:23:40 PM 437 Views
+1 - Saw it on opening night and loved it! - 19/12/2012 01:22:33 AM 920 Views
I hated it, but I know I will be in the minority. - 28/12/2012 02:45:26 PM 990 Views
i mostly agree with you - 08/01/2013 09:34:04 PM 1083 Views
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?" - 09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM 959 Views
I was dissapointed. - 29/12/2012 01:59:29 PM 1037 Views
I liked it. - 30/12/2012 03:56:15 AM 1071 Views
In a word...meh. - 03/01/2013 09:13:33 PM 879 Views
Came across an excellent review with some interesting analysis - 27/01/2013 10:17:06 PM 1047 Views
It was pretty good. - 11/02/2013 06:57:52 AM 995 Views

Reply to Message