Active Users:1106 Time:22/11/2024 09:10:45 AM
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?" beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM
For example, the troll scene. The troll scene in the book is short, and kind of silly. If it was transcribed word by word into the movie, it would have been a three-minute scene. I think the movie kept the right balance of silly/threatening for the troll scene.

Rivendale? In the book, the dwarves go to Rivendale, relax for a while, and then leave. Is that more interesting than what the movie did?

Not sure what you mean about screwing up personalities and capabilities. In the books, the dwarves other than Thorin have pretty much zero personality, other than Bombur being "the fat one." Capabilities? Surely you don't mean the dwarves, right? In the book, the dwarves pretty much scurry from scene to scene, constantly being captured or threatened.

I can definitely appreciate you talking about filler- I think the movie could have been cut down another half hour without losing anything- but I don't think it's such a massacre of the book as you're making out.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
The Hobbit - Discussion thread and first thoughts - 13/12/2012 12:21:52 AM 2343 Views
As for the 3D... - 13/12/2012 04:18:43 PM 1145 Views
Please get everyone to stop watching movies in 3D in Europe. - 15/12/2012 02:02:40 AM 1018 Views
You overestimate my influence on the people of Europe - 17/12/2012 11:08:06 AM 1037 Views
Re: As for the 3D... - 08/01/2013 09:25:43 PM 1113 Views
Re: As for the 3D... - 09/01/2013 09:13:27 AM 1049 Views
I wouldn't call it a rash - more like chafing. - 14/12/2012 04:36:42 PM 1031 Views
Ouch - comparing it to Crystal Skull? *NM* - 15/12/2012 02:02:00 AM 475 Views
Well, the trolls were Moe, Larry and Curly, so... *NM* - 15/12/2012 02:15:19 AM 477 Views
I liked it. There are some nitpicks, but overall it is enjoyable - 14/12/2012 04:50:28 PM 944 Views
A bit too silly and special effects driven. - 14/12/2012 11:10:48 PM 1018 Views
Agreed. - 23/12/2012 12:32:23 AM 1014 Views
I think two words have killed this movie for me: "orc nemesis" - 15/12/2012 02:00:33 AM 1015 Views
To be fair, it's an orc nemesis from the books. - 15/12/2012 07:23:16 PM 1030 Views
Wait are we talking about Azog here? - 16/12/2012 01:08:11 AM 981 Views
Looks like it. - 16/12/2012 12:19:19 PM 899 Views
There was not an orc nemesis in the books - 16/12/2012 01:55:59 PM 871 Views
Actually, they might have already screwed up the Thrain thing. - 19/12/2012 01:47:38 AM 1059 Views
I feel robed from my dreams. - 21/12/2012 07:57:30 PM 882 Views
If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal - 09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM 889 Views
Or it would if he weren't a useless whining moron, anyway. - 09/01/2013 05:33:16 PM 907 Views
Should have been edited down to 2 hours - 15/12/2012 11:05:29 AM 946 Views
Commercial, forgettable but enjoyable - 15/12/2012 11:42:53 AM 910 Views
It was fun, but it was also weird. - 16/12/2012 08:50:54 AM 894 Views
Better Nate than lever *NM* *NM* - 23/12/2012 11:23:40 PM 422 Views
+1 - Saw it on opening night and loved it! - 19/12/2012 01:22:33 AM 882 Views
I hated it, but I know I will be in the minority. - 28/12/2012 02:45:26 PM 948 Views
i mostly agree with you - 08/01/2013 09:34:04 PM 1050 Views
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?" - 09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM 928 Views
I was dissapointed. - 29/12/2012 01:59:29 PM 999 Views
I liked it. - 30/12/2012 03:56:15 AM 1040 Views
In a word...meh. - 03/01/2013 09:13:33 PM 842 Views
Came across an excellent review with some interesting analysis - 27/01/2013 10:17:06 PM 1006 Views
It was pretty good. - 11/02/2013 06:57:52 AM 957 Views

Reply to Message