If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM
He just kind of exists to give some kind of recognizable face to the orcs, as opposed to "oh, here are some more monsters"
It doesn't really change the story, and it makes for a better movie.
It doesn't really change the story, and it makes for a better movie.
I amuse myself.
The Hobbit - Discussion thread and first thoughts
13/12/2012 12:21:52 AM
- 2394 Views
As for the 3D...
13/12/2012 04:18:43 PM
- 1188 Views
I wouldn't call it a rash - more like chafing.
14/12/2012 04:36:42 PM
- 1067 Views
I think two words have killed this movie for me: "orc nemesis"
15/12/2012 02:00:33 AM
- 1059 Views
To be fair, it's an orc nemesis from the books.
15/12/2012 07:23:16 PM
- 1066 Views
Wait are we talking about Azog here?
16/12/2012 01:08:11 AM
- 1020 Views
Looks like it.
16/12/2012 12:19:19 PM
- 938 Views
There was not an orc nemesis in the books
16/12/2012 01:55:59 PM
- 902 Views
There actually was in Tolkein's mind, it is just contained in a different book. *NM*
28/12/2012 02:37:13 PM
- 454 Views
If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal
09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM
- 919 Views
I hated it, but I know I will be in the minority.
28/12/2012 02:45:26 PM
- 990 Views
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?"
09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM
- 959 Views
Radagast? Bunny Sledge? Archrival Azog? The whole goblin cavern scene? It's a massacre alright. *NM*
11/01/2013 03:07:55 PM
- 533 Views
i actually liked the stone giant fight, that was part of the book which i appreciated in the film
08/01/2013 09:47:18 PM
- 1034 Views