There was no 48 FPS version playing anywhere near me, so I can't comment on the "soap opera" look some people were talking about before hand. I am curious to hear what actual viewers have to say about this. The "regular" 3D was blurry during some pans, as so often, but overall definitely among the better ones since Avatar. Especially some of the long shots were beautifully deep and gorgeous to look at.
*MySmiley*
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
The Hobbit - Discussion thread and first thoughts
13/12/2012 12:21:52 AM
- 2342 Views
As for the 3D...
13/12/2012 04:18:43 PM
- 1145 Views
I wouldn't call it a rash - more like chafing.
14/12/2012 04:36:42 PM
- 1030 Views
I think two words have killed this movie for me: "orc nemesis"
15/12/2012 02:00:33 AM
- 1014 Views
To be fair, it's an orc nemesis from the books.
15/12/2012 07:23:16 PM
- 1029 Views
Wait are we talking about Azog here?
16/12/2012 01:08:11 AM
- 981 Views
Looks like it.
16/12/2012 12:19:19 PM
- 899 Views
There was not an orc nemesis in the books
16/12/2012 01:55:59 PM
- 870 Views
There actually was in Tolkein's mind, it is just contained in a different book. *NM*
28/12/2012 02:37:13 PM
- 439 Views
If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal
09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM
- 889 Views
I hated it, but I know I will be in the minority.
28/12/2012 02:45:26 PM
- 947 Views
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?"
09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM
- 927 Views
Radagast? Bunny Sledge? Archrival Azog? The whole goblin cavern scene? It's a massacre alright. *NM*
11/01/2013 03:07:55 PM
- 519 Views
i actually liked the stone giant fight, that was part of the book which i appreciated in the film
08/01/2013 09:47:18 PM
- 999 Views