Active Users:1120 Time:23/11/2024 12:11:55 AM
Perhaps her vortex manipulator? Nate Send a noteboard - 01/10/2012 06:49:56 AM
Cheap and dirty time travel, able to access areas the TARDIS can't. Though that would also mean the Doctor would be able to go back and see them using it, but it only works on one person so he wouldn't be able to take them anywhere.

None of that explains why the Doctor couldn't just take the TARDIS and go to, say, 1940, clear of the 1938 temporal disturbances, and pick them up a couple years later for them, and bring them home. He can't double back easily on his own timeline, but they're not on his timeline anymore ... except for the fact that he saw their tombstone, and if he went back and got them there would be no tombstone. That might be it. Going back to get them would alter his own past (his viewing of the tombstone), and create another paradox.

But overall, it'll be a cold day in hell when Doctor Who has firmly defined rules of time travel. I loved the episode.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Doctor Who Fall Finale Question: SPOILERS - 01/10/2012 03:04:46 AM 808 Views
Maybe an answer? - 01/10/2012 05:22:11 AM 674 Views
Perhaps her vortex manipulator? - 01/10/2012 06:49:56 AM 616 Views
To kind of hijack the thread so I don't have to make a new topic, I have my own question.... - 01/10/2012 01:19:58 PM 627 Views
Re: To kind of hijack the thread so I don't have to make a new topic, I have my own question.... - 01/10/2012 07:12:15 PM 618 Views
Re: To kind of hijack the thread so I don't have to make a new topic, I have my own question.... - 01/10/2012 07:59:54 PM 677 Views
I felt the same way. - 02/10/2012 12:17:57 AM 786 Views
Re: I felt the same way. - 02/10/2012 02:25:13 AM 632 Views
The Tor.com review had a great quote on the Doctor & River - 02/10/2012 03:11:48 AM 834 Views
Re: To kind of hijack the thread so I don't have to make a new topic, I have my own question.... - 01/10/2012 09:06:44 PM 762 Views
At least they weren't shown moving this time. - 02/10/2012 12:23:06 AM 645 Views

Reply to Message