Active Users:1191 Time:22/11/2024 10:43:06 PM
Re: So, Fringe *spoilers for end of season 4* dacole Send a noteboard - 18/05/2012 05:12:02 AM
I have been paying attention. And I know the previous plot lines were shaken up a bit when Peter disappeared. So Bell's actions are based in Dr Bishop's loss of his son, which would not have been there in the previous timeline.

And Jones was allegedly not smart enough to have done it all on his own.
So what was he doing in the first few seasons? What was the point of that?

I am beginning to feel that the first two or three years of the show were wasted time.


I think there having not read other theories, he was trying to do the same thing but in a different way and was not nearly as successful without bell. Now some of these later seasons I think they made up as they went along so yeah its not like they were planning all this from the beginning..would have worked better if they were (like in b5) but not everyone does that unfortunately.
Reply to message
So, Fringe *spoilers for end of season 4* - 17/05/2012 09:25:42 AM 780 Views
As I understand it.. - 17/05/2012 11:07:45 AM 767 Views
One of the theories i have read-and that I feel has merit- is... - 18/05/2012 02:27:06 AM 663 Views
But that makes little sense - 18/05/2012 07:19:01 AM 612 Views
I would need to rewatch, but - 18/05/2012 02:41:27 PM 695 Views
Walter wrote the book about the coming war in the timeline where he stole Peter. - 24/05/2012 05:07:04 AM 641 Views
But what of the bowling guy? - 24/05/2012 05:54:22 AM 903 Views
Re: So, Fringe *spoilers for end of season 4* - 18/05/2012 05:12:02 AM 582 Views
They've said before... - 18/05/2012 05:17:45 AM 728 Views
I finally got around to watch the second half of the season - 09/06/2012 12:12:22 PM 599 Views

Reply to Message