Active Users:1073 Time:13/11/2024 06:14:10 AM
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. dacole Send a noteboard - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM
It'd be like having Batman and never once showing the Batcave or Batmobile. You could do it and get away with it, but fans would whine.

I do wonder if by showing how easily it was almost taken out and having Banner go on about how it submerging would be cooler, that Whedon wasn't lampshading the lunacy of the concept and explaining why he won't use it in the future. Maybe in THE AVENGERS 2 (or the next time SHIELD shows up) they'll have a Sub-Carrier instead?


I suspect you are right. Whedon does things like that...and yes a submersible carrier now THAT would be badass.
Reply to message
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated) - 05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM 1374 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM 825 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM 902 Views
You guys are weird. - 06/05/2012 03:59:15 PM 681 Views
You're wierd - 06/05/2012 07:21:04 PM 611 Views
I know. - 07/05/2012 03:27:05 AM 580 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 07/05/2012 08:34:18 AM 624 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM 629 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM 633 Views
Einstein would have made a lot more sense... - 05/05/2012 02:23:46 PM 648 Views
Nah - 06/05/2012 03:46:21 PM 628 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 02:09:08 AM 538 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 03:31:47 AM 621 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 11:19:54 PM 644 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM 655 Views
True - 06/05/2012 06:06:26 PM 627 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM 700 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM 692 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM 643 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM 575 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM 575 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with. - 14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM 583 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier? - 07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM 569 Views
When you say six movies, are you counting both Hulk movies? *NM* - 05/05/2012 01:22:50 PM 360 Views
Yes *NM* - 06/05/2012 07:03:22 PM 279 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM 609 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM 804 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie. - 14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM 591 Views
??? - 15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM 537 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM 665 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes. - 07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM 670 Views
There were some. - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM 712 Views
In the comics Cap stopped using guns - 14/05/2012 01:57:59 PM 796 Views
On the bank - 08/05/2012 08:32:41 PM 599 Views
Might just be a nod to a classic comic book scene - 09/05/2012 02:25:41 PM 566 Views
The Hulk "spoiler" - 08/05/2012 12:15:54 AM 612 Views
This, plus: - 09/05/2012 12:45:18 PM 698 Views
It's an id thing. - 14/05/2012 11:27:19 PM 638 Views
Banner is a trauma induced schizophrenic *NM* - 09/05/2012 02:28:21 PM 300 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM 590 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM 588 Views

Reply to Message