Active Users:382 Time:08/04/2025 09:07:56 PM
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. dacole Send a noteboard - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM
It'd be like having Batman and never once showing the Batcave or Batmobile. You could do it and get away with it, but fans would whine.

I do wonder if by showing how easily it was almost taken out and having Banner go on about how it submerging would be cooler, that Whedon wasn't lampshading the lunacy of the concept and explaining why he won't use it in the future. Maybe in THE AVENGERS 2 (or the next time SHIELD shows up) they'll have a Sub-Carrier instead?


I suspect you are right. Whedon does things like that...and yes a submersible carrier now THAT would be badass.
Reply to message
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated) - 05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM 1446 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM 898 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM 992 Views
You guys are weird. - 06/05/2012 03:59:15 PM 752 Views
You're wierd - 06/05/2012 07:21:04 PM 684 Views
I know. - 07/05/2012 03:27:05 AM 655 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 07/05/2012 08:34:18 AM 691 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM 668 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM 704 Views
Einstein would have made a lot more sense... - 05/05/2012 02:23:46 PM 714 Views
Nah - 06/05/2012 03:46:21 PM 702 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 02:09:08 AM 612 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 03:31:47 AM 698 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 11:19:54 PM 722 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM 738 Views
True - 06/05/2012 06:06:26 PM 699 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM 765 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM 760 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM 713 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM 646 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM 656 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with. - 14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM 662 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier? - 07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM 641 Views
When you say six movies, are you counting both Hulk movies? *NM* - 05/05/2012 01:22:50 PM 394 Views
Yes *NM* - 06/05/2012 07:03:22 PM 309 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM 680 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM 875 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie. - 14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM 666 Views
??? - 15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM 610 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM 732 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes. - 07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM 715 Views
There were some. - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM 775 Views
In the comics Cap stopped using guns - 14/05/2012 01:57:59 PM 868 Views
On the bank - 08/05/2012 08:32:41 PM 670 Views
Might just be a nod to a classic comic book scene - 09/05/2012 02:25:41 PM 635 Views
The Hulk "spoiler" - 08/05/2012 12:15:54 AM 680 Views
This, plus: - 09/05/2012 12:45:18 PM 775 Views
It's an id thing. - 14/05/2012 11:27:19 PM 723 Views
Banner is a trauma induced schizophrenic *NM* - 09/05/2012 02:28:21 PM 334 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM 681 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM 658 Views

Reply to Message