You keep doing it! Female character is fine, female human is fine, but female just on its own? 
That's fine. I have no problem whatsoever with this statement.
And just to explain my statements above:
I fear the term feminist carries such a negative connotation sometimes because it seems that it's out to tell people what they are allowed to think about females.
If I want to watch a film where the female is nothing more than the pretty, dumb eye candy next to the hero, I'll do that. Because, ya know, such females exist. That's not the same as telling every woman out there to do or be the same. And then after I turn this film off I watch Ripley kick alien ass as good as any male character could have. Just don't tell me I have to decide, can't have both or that every film will have a Katniss now. Females are pretty and are ugly, they are smart and dumb. Just like movie characters. And just like guys.
The teenage guys in the row behind us were obviously disappointed Lawrence didn't get naked in the film. And they laughed while the little girl died. Idiots, obviously. But proof that people went to see this film for all kinds of reasons and one should not read too much into it either way.

Also the movie is quite worthwhile. You should see it.
Once again, I thing hunger games is feminist because it doesn't have any stereotypes of how a woman should be and act, and absolutely no emphasis is places on her gender. There are very few such movies!
Once again, I thing hunger games is feminist because it doesn't have any stereotypes of how a woman should be and act, and absolutely no emphasis is places on her gender. There are very few such movies!
That's fine. I have no problem whatsoever with this statement.
And just to explain my statements above:
I fear the term feminist carries such a negative connotation sometimes because it seems that it's out to tell people what they are allowed to think about females.
If I want to watch a film where the female is nothing more than the pretty, dumb eye candy next to the hero, I'll do that. Because, ya know, such females exist. That's not the same as telling every woman out there to do or be the same. And then after I turn this film off I watch Ripley kick alien ass as good as any male character could have. Just don't tell me I have to decide, can't have both or that every film will have a Katniss now. Females are pretty and are ugly, they are smart and dumb. Just like movie characters. And just like guys.
The teenage guys in the row behind us were obviously disappointed Lawrence didn't get naked in the film. And they laughed while the little girl died. Idiots, obviously. But proof that people went to see this film for all kinds of reasons and one should not read too much into it either way.
Seriously this is the kind of radical feminism that is ridiculous. Female the word is in now way derogatory simply on its own can it be used that way...sure but so can any other descriptive term..."Well he's just male so you can't expect him to understand". Feminism in its best form is the radical notion that women are people...and that it is it. You go beyond that and you are getting into crazy town. I wouldn't call this a feminist movie because I like to think we have gotten past the idea that women can't be physically strong and active. But seeing a physically strong and outdoorsy female character is certainly always nice there are not enough of them. Anything that breaks the crazy princess stereotype is a good thing.
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review.
03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM
- 2325 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes"
03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM
- 1098 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet
03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM
- 1041 Views
It's not. That's what shallow idiots say about things where women have power or physical skills *NM*
04/04/2012 03:45:22 PM
- 947 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist.
03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM
- 1016 Views
Where do I start?
03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM
- 1019 Views
But that is exactly what feminist means "it could have been a boy just as well"
04/04/2012 01:42:43 PM
- 1008 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying
03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM
- 924 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist?
03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM
- 1028 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist?
04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
- 918 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical.
04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM
- 992 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph
04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM
- 966 Views
To you "feminist" is a dirty word? To me, it means acceptable. Differences in definitions I think
04/04/2012 01:50:32 PM
- 920 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out
04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM
- 971 Views
Fair enough
04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM
- 1012 Views
Stop using female as a noun!
04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM
- 919 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred
04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM
- 931 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM
- 916 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though
04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM
- 852 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds.
04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM
- 935 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
- 975 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize.
04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM
- 887 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory
04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM
- 861 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM*
04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM
- 1104 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly...
04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM
- 834 Views
That's not what I said.
04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM
- 946 Views
Which flies in the face of it's ordinary usage, which smacks of needless revisionism.
06/04/2012 09:42:15 AM
- 885 Views
Accusatory of what.i think you meant annoyed. So youre annoyed she was annoyed? Let's out this to re *NM*
09/04/2012 12:44:17 PM
- 958 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears)
06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM
- 929 Views
Nope. (edit)
06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM
- 912 Views
Re: Nope. (edit)
07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM
- 979 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse.
07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM
- 870 Views
Ok.
07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM
- 1158 Views
Let's try and whittle this down some so as to help you with the quotes.
07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
- 868 Views

However he meant it, it was unpleasant to read. Just use "woman" instead. *NM*
05/04/2012 08:13:13 PM
- 820 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM
- 925 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words
06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM
- 1003 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind.
04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM
- 884 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM
- 887 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM
- 875 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing?
*NM*
04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
- 885 Views

Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
- 940 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun!
05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM
- 827 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM
- 866 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that.
06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM
- 900 Views
Fascinating.
06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM
- 925 Views
Re: Fascinating.
07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM
- 903 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references.
07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM
- 902 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is?
07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM
- 961 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong.
07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM
- 841 Views
Sorry, no. Read better.
07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM
- 873 Views
Re: If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
09/04/2012 03:09:06 AM
- 883 Views
Nothing wrong with your use of female. You should ignore those crazy foreigners saying otherwise. *NM*
06/04/2012 02:49:41 PM
- 774 Views
I think I'll start saying males instead of men. If the males here don't mind? *NM*
09/04/2012 12:58:54 PM
- 888 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM
- 948 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM
- 893 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM*
03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM
- 851 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers*
04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
- 927 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character
04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM
- 952 Views