You keep doing it! Female character is fine, female human is fine, but female just on its own?
That's fine. I have no problem whatsoever with this statement.
And just to explain my statements above:
I fear the term feminist carries such a negative connotation sometimes because it seems that it's out to tell people what they are allowed to think about females.
If I want to watch a film where the female is nothing more than the pretty, dumb eye candy next to the hero, I'll do that. Because, ya know, such females exist. That's not the same as telling every woman out there to do or be the same. And then after I turn this film off I watch Ripley kick alien ass as good as any male character could have. Just don't tell me I have to decide, can't have both or that every film will have a Katniss now. Females are pretty and are ugly, they are smart and dumb. Just like movie characters. And just like guys.
The teenage guys in the row behind us were obviously disappointed Lawrence didn't get naked in the film. And they laughed while the little girl died. Idiots, obviously. But proof that people went to see this film for all kinds of reasons and one should not read too much into it either way.
Also the movie is quite worthwhile. You should see it.
Once again, I thing hunger games is feminist because it doesn't have any stereotypes of how a woman should be and act, and absolutely no emphasis is places on her gender. There are very few such movies!
Once again, I thing hunger games is feminist because it doesn't have any stereotypes of how a woman should be and act, and absolutely no emphasis is places on her gender. There are very few such movies!
That's fine. I have no problem whatsoever with this statement.
And just to explain my statements above:
I fear the term feminist carries such a negative connotation sometimes because it seems that it's out to tell people what they are allowed to think about females.
If I want to watch a film where the female is nothing more than the pretty, dumb eye candy next to the hero, I'll do that. Because, ya know, such females exist. That's not the same as telling every woman out there to do or be the same. And then after I turn this film off I watch Ripley kick alien ass as good as any male character could have. Just don't tell me I have to decide, can't have both or that every film will have a Katniss now. Females are pretty and are ugly, they are smart and dumb. Just like movie characters. And just like guys.
The teenage guys in the row behind us were obviously disappointed Lawrence didn't get naked in the film. And they laughed while the little girl died. Idiots, obviously. But proof that people went to see this film for all kinds of reasons and one should not read too much into it either way.
Seriously this is the kind of radical feminism that is ridiculous. Female the word is in now way derogatory simply on its own can it be used that way...sure but so can any other descriptive term..."Well he's just male so you can't expect him to understand". Feminism in its best form is the radical notion that women are people...and that it is it. You go beyond that and you are getting into crazy town. I wouldn't call this a feminist movie because I like to think we have gotten past the idea that women can't be physically strong and active. But seeing a physically strong and outdoorsy female character is certainly always nice there are not enough of them. Anything that breaks the crazy princess stereotype is a good thing.
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review.
03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM
- 2182 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes"
03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM
- 966 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet
03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM
- 914 Views
It's not. That's what shallow idiots say about things where women have power or physical skills *NM*
04/04/2012 03:45:22 PM
- 813 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist.
03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM
- 879 Views
Where do I start?
03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM
- 887 Views
But that is exactly what feminist means "it could have been a boy just as well"
04/04/2012 01:42:43 PM
- 871 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying
03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM
- 793 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist?
03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM
- 899 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist?
04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
- 782 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical.
04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM
- 860 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph
04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM
- 837 Views
To you "feminist" is a dirty word? To me, it means acceptable. Differences in definitions I think
04/04/2012 01:50:32 PM
- 789 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out
04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM
- 831 Views
Fair enough
04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM
- 869 Views
Stop using female as a noun!
04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM
- 795 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred
04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM
- 796 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM
- 790 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though
04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM
- 724 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds.
04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM
- 808 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
- 844 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize.
04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM
- 760 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory
04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM
- 732 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM*
04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM
- 976 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly...
04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM
- 704 Views
That's not what I said.
04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM
- 818 Views
Which flies in the face of it's ordinary usage, which smacks of needless revisionism.
06/04/2012 09:42:15 AM
- 754 Views
Accusatory of what.i think you meant annoyed. So youre annoyed she was annoyed? Let's out this to re *NM*
09/04/2012 12:44:17 PM
- 818 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears)
06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM
- 789 Views
Nope. (edit)
06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM
- 787 Views
Re: Nope. (edit)
07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM
- 854 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse.
07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM
- 740 Views
Ok.
07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM
- 1022 Views
Let's try and whittle this down some so as to help you with the quotes.
07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
- 739 Views
However he meant it, it was unpleasant to read. Just use "woman" instead. *NM*
05/04/2012 08:13:13 PM
- 688 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM
- 795 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words
06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM
- 868 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind.
04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM
- 750 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM
- 769 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM
- 749 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing? *NM*
04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
- 753 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
- 819 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun!
05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM
- 701 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM
- 737 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that.
06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM
- 769 Views
Fascinating.
06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM
- 796 Views
Re: Fascinating.
07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM
- 774 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references.
07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM
- 774 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is?
07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM
- 834 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong.
07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM
- 709 Views
Sorry, no. Read better.
07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM
- 749 Views
Re: If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
09/04/2012 03:09:06 AM
- 762 Views
Nothing wrong with your use of female. You should ignore those crazy foreigners saying otherwise. *NM*
06/04/2012 02:49:41 PM
- 652 Views
I think I'll start saying males instead of men. If the males here don't mind? *NM*
09/04/2012 12:58:54 PM
- 737 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM
- 811 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM
- 761 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM*
03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM
- 724 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers*
04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
- 798 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character
04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM
- 822 Views