His whole point isn't that she's passive, it's that she's not in control of her own decisions.
I would love to hear some examples from you, which show where he s wrong. It would help him to put his arguments (and to be honest yours too, which so far boils down to "I haven't really read what he said, but he is wrong, believe me" in perspective.
I would love to hear some examples from you, which show where he s wrong. It would help him to put his arguments (and to be honest yours too, which so far boils down to "I haven't really read what he said, but he is wrong, believe me" in perspective.
Speaking as someone who has read the book, the author has a point. To a certain degree, many of her decisions are negated by the actions of others in the book. What the author doesn't mention is that this is a theme of the book. They live in a very controlled society, undera very strict authoritarian government. They are kidnapped away from their families, forced to perform in costumes provided by others. Manipulated in interviews and by their mentors. Then thrust into an arena where every aspect of the environment can be twisted and changed by the people on the outside to manipulate reactions from the characters.
The loss of female "agency" in the book isn't so much an anti-feminist portrayal. It is an integral theme to the series and it most definitely continues through the other books.
That said, there are times in all three books where Katniss forces her own will into the situation. Volunteering as tribute is the most obvious one that comes to mind for the first book. Choosing to take poison with Peeta at the end is another. She is not allowed to follow through with that for obvious reasons, but she turned the tables on the game makers to force their hands.
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review.
03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM
- 2191 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes"
03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM
- 973 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet
03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM
- 920 Views
It's not. That's what shallow idiots say about things where women have power or physical skills *NM*
04/04/2012 03:45:22 PM
- 820 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist.
03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM
- 886 Views
Where do I start?
03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM
- 895 Views
But that is exactly what feminist means "it could have been a boy just as well"
04/04/2012 01:42:43 PM
- 877 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying
03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM
- 802 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist?
03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM
- 907 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist?
04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
- 789 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical.
04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM
- 870 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph
04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM
- 844 Views
To you "feminist" is a dirty word? To me, it means acceptable. Differences in definitions I think
04/04/2012 01:50:32 PM
- 796 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out
04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM
- 841 Views
Fair enough
04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM
- 877 Views
Stop using female as a noun!
04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM
- 804 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred
04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM
- 804 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM
- 796 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though
04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM
- 729 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds.
04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM
- 813 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
- 852 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize.
04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM
- 766 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory
04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM
- 744 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM*
04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM
- 983 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly...
04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM
- 712 Views
That's not what I said.
04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM
- 827 Views
Which flies in the face of it's ordinary usage, which smacks of needless revisionism.
06/04/2012 09:42:15 AM
- 761 Views
Accusatory of what.i think you meant annoyed. So youre annoyed she was annoyed? Let's out this to re *NM*
09/04/2012 12:44:17 PM
- 829 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears)
06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM
- 798 Views
Nope. (edit)
06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM
- 795 Views
Re: Nope. (edit)
07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM
- 863 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse.
07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM
- 750 Views
Ok.
07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM
- 1029 Views
Let's try and whittle this down some so as to help you with the quotes.
07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
- 748 Views
However he meant it, it was unpleasant to read. Just use "woman" instead. *NM*
05/04/2012 08:13:13 PM
- 696 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM
- 804 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words
06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM
- 875 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind.
04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM
- 758 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM
- 774 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM
- 757 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing? *NM*
04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
- 759 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
- 829 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun!
05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM
- 708 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM
- 745 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that.
06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM
- 778 Views
Fascinating.
06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM
- 808 Views
Re: Fascinating.
07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM
- 783 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references.
07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM
- 783 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is?
07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM
- 841 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong.
07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM
- 718 Views
Sorry, no. Read better.
07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM
- 754 Views
Re: If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
09/04/2012 03:09:06 AM
- 769 Views
Nothing wrong with your use of female. You should ignore those crazy foreigners saying otherwise. *NM*
06/04/2012 02:49:41 PM
- 659 Views
I think I'll start saying males instead of men. If the males here don't mind? *NM*
09/04/2012 12:58:54 PM
- 755 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM
- 820 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM
- 771 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 07:51:46 PM
- 788 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM*
03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM
- 730 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers*
04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
- 804 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character
04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM
- 830 Views