As it is, I have absolutely no idea. However, though I don't think the Hunger Games are feminist, wouldn't particularly care about it if they were (like ironclad said, it's only annoying if it's preachy, and even then it isn't annoying because it's feminism, but because it's something that is preachy), I have to say that all the people I saw talking and raving about it on facebook were female. Is that a coincidence? Perhaps, but probably not.
Ultimately it hinges on whether or not Katniss is an active character or not. I wasn't able to finish the whole article, because I lost interest in it. But from what I gathered, the writer thought she was as passive as Cinderella, merely responding to events (unsuccessfully), until further events took matters out of her hands. I don't know if that's true or not, and the Cinderella comparison is definitely hyperbole, but I could imagine it being true. It seems like just the sort of thing to keep the main character from making polarizing decisions that would render her a murky gray.
Ultimately it hinges on whether or not Katniss is an active character or not. I wasn't able to finish the whole article, because I lost interest in it. But from what I gathered, the writer thought she was as passive as Cinderella, merely responding to events (unsuccessfully), until further events took matters out of her hands. I don't know if that's true or not, and the Cinderella comparison is definitely hyperbole, but I could imagine it being true. It seems like just the sort of thing to keep the main character from making polarizing decisions that would render her a murky gray.
The article is crap serious crap, I skimmed it. Th character is far from passive. And it disturbs me the way the writer of the article dismisses all of her actions and accomplishments. just about the only thing katniss doesn't do is go after other kids with the intent to murder them.
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review.
03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM
- 2167 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes"
03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM
- 955 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet
03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM
- 898 Views
It's not. That's what shallow idiots say about things where women have power or physical skills *NM*
04/04/2012 03:45:22 PM
- 802 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist.
03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM
- 869 Views
Where do I start?
03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM
- 875 Views
But that is exactly what feminist means "it could have been a boy just as well"
04/04/2012 01:42:43 PM
- 855 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying
03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM
- 777 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist?
03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM
- 881 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist?
04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
- 768 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical.
04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM
- 846 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph
04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM
- 827 Views
To you "feminist" is a dirty word? To me, it means acceptable. Differences in definitions I think
04/04/2012 01:50:32 PM
- 776 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out
04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM
- 815 Views
Fair enough
04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM
- 859 Views
Stop using female as a noun!
04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM
- 782 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred
04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM
- 784 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM
- 775 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though
04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM
- 714 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds.
04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM
- 790 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
- 833 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize.
04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM
- 747 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory
04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM
- 720 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM*
04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM
- 956 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly...
04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM
- 693 Views
That's not what I said.
04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM
- 808 Views
Which flies in the face of it's ordinary usage, which smacks of needless revisionism.
06/04/2012 09:42:15 AM
- 740 Views
Accusatory of what.i think you meant annoyed. So youre annoyed she was annoyed? Let's out this to re *NM*
09/04/2012 12:44:17 PM
- 809 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears)
06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM
- 777 Views
Nope. (edit)
06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM
- 770 Views
Re: Nope. (edit)
07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM
- 842 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse.
07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM
- 729 Views
Ok.
07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM
- 1007 Views
Let's try and whittle this down some so as to help you with the quotes.
07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
- 727 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
However he meant it, it was unpleasant to read. Just use "woman" instead. *NM*
05/04/2012 08:13:13 PM
- 675 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM
- 784 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words
06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM
- 845 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind.
04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM
- 728 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM
- 742 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM
- 737 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing?
*NM*
04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
- 744 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/perplexed.gif)
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
- 807 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun!
05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM
- 690 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM
- 724 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that.
06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM
- 755 Views
Fascinating.
06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM
- 788 Views
Re: Fascinating.
07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM
- 749 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references.
07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM
- 761 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is?
07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM
- 810 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong.
07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM
- 698 Views
Sorry, no. Read better.
07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM
- 735 Views
Re: If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
09/04/2012 03:09:06 AM
- 746 Views
Nothing wrong with your use of female. You should ignore those crazy foreigners saying otherwise. *NM*
06/04/2012 02:49:41 PM
- 639 Views
I think I'll start saying males instead of men. If the males here don't mind? *NM*
09/04/2012 12:58:54 PM
- 710 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM
- 797 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM
- 750 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM*
03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM
- 713 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers*
04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
- 778 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character
04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM
- 802 Views