The majority of people go see movies because the premise sounds good, they have a great trailer, someone popular starring etc. They don't give a rats ass if the MC is male or female, as long as it is interesting and well written. There have been huge hits with female MC for 30 years (Aliens, Resident evil franchise). And there have been flops. To even point out that something is feminist and a huge step is pointing the finger at something that is an artificial problem and therefore contributing to the problem all over again.
Characters like Ripley, Leia in major blockbusters have long been considered as results of feminist progress in the 1970s. A decade earlier, and you wouldn't have seen characters like this in blockbusters, and it's not because Ripley is barely a cause for comments now that she didn't cause many when the movie was originally released.
Ton of people like you or me consider this perfectly natural/normal and that a woman can be any kind of heroine without necessarily being there to bring in the male audience through exploitation is yet another result of feminism's success at changing mentalities.
Writers like Rowling or that of HG are a new generation of feminists. They no longer "preach" with their fiction, they have simply integrated the feminist values they grew up with. Some call them post feminist works.
But calling this "an artificial problem" is going too far. There's still a fair percentage of the audience, including in the primary market of the Hollywood movies - and such a review is a reflect of this - for whom even integrating those gender values that merely reflects the changes brought to mentalities by feminism is pushing a feminist agenda and a problem. For you and a large part of the audience it's obviously integrated values, for many others its a movie with a gender-based agenda. Stuff like this still surfaces every time a female heroine like this becomes popular and becomes a target as a "feminist icon" for reactionary groups/individuals (and the opposite is also true... just think how much loathing surrounds the values represented in Twilight, and how much grief it causes many that stuff like this can still have success with young women). Also take into consideration just how many female characters are little more than eye-candy for the male viewers in Hollywood blockbusters - and this is why characters like the one in HG still stand out.
Are works like HG, HP feminist? Most definitely, in the sense that they reflect feminist values. Whether either is an example of intentional activism from their creators is another story. To many writers from these generations who consider themselves feminist, it's not so much as pushing an agenda as using the creative freedom the success of feminism granted them and reflecting their own values.
This message has been locked.
This message last edited by DomA on 04/04/2012 at 01:49:45 PM
This message last edited by DomA on 04/04/2012 at 01:49:45 PM
- Edit 1 by DomA on 04/04/2012 at 01:49:45 PM
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review.
03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM
- 2199 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes"
03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM
- 982 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet
03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM
- 930 Views
It's not. That's what shallow idiots say about things where women have power or physical skills *NM*
04/04/2012 03:45:22 PM
- 832 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist.
03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM
- 898 Views
Where do I start?
03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM
- 905 Views
But that is exactly what feminist means "it could have been a boy just as well"
04/04/2012 01:42:43 PM
- 887 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying
03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM
- 812 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist?
03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM
- 917 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist?
04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
- 802 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical.
04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM
- 879 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph
04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM
- 854 Views
Re: Completely agree with your first paragraph
04/04/2012 01:43:55 PM
- 820 Views
To you "feminist" is a dirty word? To me, it means acceptable. Differences in definitions I think
04/04/2012 01:50:32 PM
- 804 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out
04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM
- 849 Views
Fair enough
04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM
- 886 Views
Stop using female as a noun!
04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM
- 810 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred
04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM
- 817 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM
- 807 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though
04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM
- 739 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds.
04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM
- 824 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
- 860 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize.
04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM
- 777 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory
04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM
- 752 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM*
04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM
- 992 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly...
04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM
- 720 Views
That's not what I said.
04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM
- 837 Views
Which flies in the face of it's ordinary usage, which smacks of needless revisionism.
06/04/2012 09:42:15 AM
- 767 Views
Accusatory of what.i think you meant annoyed. So youre annoyed she was annoyed? Let's out this to re *NM*
09/04/2012 12:44:17 PM
- 835 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears)
06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM
- 809 Views
Nope. (edit)
06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM
- 802 Views
Re: Nope. (edit)
07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM
- 869 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse.
07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM
- 759 Views
Ok.
07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM
- 1039 Views
Let's try and whittle this down some so as to help you with the quotes.
07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
- 757 Views
However he meant it, it was unpleasant to read. Just use "woman" instead. *NM*
05/04/2012 08:13:13 PM
- 707 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM
- 816 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words
06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM
- 880 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind.
04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM
- 768 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM
- 783 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM
- 767 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing? *NM*
04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
- 772 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
- 836 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun!
05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM
- 716 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM
- 754 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that.
06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM
- 784 Views
Fascinating.
06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM
- 816 Views
Re: Fascinating.
07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM
- 790 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references.
07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM
- 788 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is?
07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM
- 848 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong.
07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM
- 725 Views
Sorry, no. Read better.
07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM
- 765 Views
Re: If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
09/04/2012 03:09:06 AM
- 775 Views
Nothing wrong with your use of female. You should ignore those crazy foreigners saying otherwise. *NM*
06/04/2012 02:49:41 PM
- 663 Views
I think I'll start saying males instead of men. If the males here don't mind? *NM*
09/04/2012 12:58:54 PM
- 769 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM
- 830 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM
- 778 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM*
03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM
- 739 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers*
04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
- 814 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character
04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM
- 838 Views