Active Users:560 Time:23/02/2025 09:39:00 PM
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers* Mat Maniac Send a noteboard - 04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
Not actively pursuing and killing the other competitors in NOT the same as not making a choice. She was forced (with some slight volunteering) into a situation where she was presented with 2 options (Kill or be killed), and chose the third (survival). This choosing the third, non-presented, option is not unique to this story and is a common element in stories themed around maintaining morality in an "immoral" environment.

Though the capitol has removed so many of the people's freedoms, Katniss is able to maintain her free will and choose to not descend into the violent murder role that the capitol has chosen for her.

In the end it could be debated that her choice to maintain her morality was more important to her than her own life when she chose double suicide when the gamemakers' reneged on their implied promise of a possible two survivors. I say debate because IIRC it is not 100% clear whether she would have gone though with it even if she felt the gamemakers were going to allow their deaths.
"Anybody who goes to bed the same day they got up is a quitter."

Bonded to wolfsister
Achewon Nutiket*
*Spiritual Guard
RIP Kory
This message has been locked.
This message last edited by Mat Maniac on 04/04/2012 at 05:45:31 AM
  • Edit 1 by Mat Maniac on 04/04/2012 at 05:45:31 AM
Reply to message
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review. - 03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM 2206 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes" - 03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM 1001 Views
Ok, I did and basically it's garbage. *NM* - 03/04/2012 04:53:00 PM 816 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet - 03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM 942 Views
No, it's totally off. *NM* - 03/04/2012 05:39:03 PM 809 Views
fair enough. like I said, I haven't read it yet. *NM* - 03/04/2012 07:20:34 PM 755 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist. - 03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM 909 Views
Where do I start? - 03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM 920 Views
Hermoine was the most kick ass of the Potter kids. - 04/04/2012 03:08:17 AM 784 Views
So? Hunger Games has lots of male characters. - 04/04/2012 05:30:21 AM 840 Views
His racism point... - 04/04/2012 02:32:43 PM 726 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying - 03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM 829 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist? - 03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM 929 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist? - 04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM 818 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph - 04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM 868 Views
Re: Completely agree with your first paragraph - 04/04/2012 01:43:55 PM 833 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out - 04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM 870 Views
Fair enough - 04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM 916 Views
Stop using female as a noun! - 04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM 820 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred - 04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM 829 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one. - 04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM 821 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though - 04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM 753 Views
Thank you! - 04/04/2012 08:03:38 PM 859 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds. - 04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM 838 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over - 04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM 875 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize. - 04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM 792 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory - 04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM 766 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM 1007 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly... - 04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM 736 Views
That's not what I said. - 04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM 849 Views
I'm going to have to just outright disagree with you then. *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:54:25 PM 782 Views
If I wanted to be accusatory... - 04/04/2012 11:05:37 PM 798 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears) - 06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM 821 Views
Nope. (edit) - 06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM 816 Views
Re: Nope. (edit) - 07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM 881 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse. - 07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM 774 Views
Ok. - 07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM 1054 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one. - 05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM 828 Views
I think the language difference is really interesting. - 05/04/2012 03:13:03 PM 830 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words - 06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM 897 Views
LOL! You don't say... - 06/04/2012 05:06:20 PM 800 Views
LOL u so mad - 06/04/2012 06:19:28 PM 788 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind. - 04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM 786 Views
My dear - 09/04/2012 01:07:34 PM 829 Views
LOL - 09/04/2012 01:57:53 PM 680 Views
guess what, it is a noun. *NM* - 04/04/2012 07:26:39 PM 666 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. - 04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM 792 Views
well it's important that you say "female human" - 04/04/2012 09:28:45 PM 786 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. - 04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM 779 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing? *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM 787 Views
No, I have issues with words that begin with the letter f. - 04/04/2012 11:09:45 PM 811 Views
ooookay then. - 04/04/2012 11:11:23 PM 863 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun! - 05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM 731 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here. - 05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM 769 Views
For the record, I certainly don't think you're crazy town. - 05/04/2012 07:23:18 PM 778 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that. - 06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM 795 Views
Fascinating. - 06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM 831 Views
Re: Fascinating. - 07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM 805 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references. - 07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM 804 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is? - 07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM 856 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong. - 07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM 744 Views
Sorry, no. Read better. - 07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM 776 Views
*deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here. - 07/04/2012 06:38:08 PM 756 Views
Re: *deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here. - 07/04/2012 09:26:34 PM 867 Views
Aha, we found the problem - 09/04/2012 01:03:35 PM 855 Views
You're being disingenuous. - 09/04/2012 12:57:38 PM 781 Views
To be fair - 04/04/2012 02:37:25 PM 823 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM 844 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM 794 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 07:51:46 PM 800 Views
This - 05/04/2012 12:20:04 AM 788 Views
I got half way through the review and got bored. - 04/04/2012 03:09:58 AM 763 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers* - 04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM 832 Views
I think that might be debatable - 05/04/2012 06:59:35 PM 806 Views
She still made plenty of choices and she did choose to kill. - 05/04/2012 07:13:47 PM 756 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character - 04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM 850 Views
Out of curiosity (this off topic) - 04/04/2012 07:32:25 PM 753 Views
Rachel, of course. - 05/04/2012 12:17:41 AM 818 Views
Well. Now I've actually seen it. (mild spoilers) - 09/04/2012 12:17:03 AM 865 Views