People thinking that it is feminist is what saddens me. Both those that think it's feminist and dislike it, and those that think it's feminist and laud it. Because finding it to be feminist just because it has a female main character is admitting defeat. It means that when a movie has a male MC it's just a normal movie, but if it has a female character then it's feminist. That isn't the way it should be, -isms should be reserved for when something is truly radical. I'd call a movie feminist if it was bringing women up while putting men down, not if it's just featuring a female character. That to me is perfectly ordinary.

As for why I said I can imagine it to be true... Yes, I realize it is quite ridiculous to say that I don't know a thing about the movie or the books, and to make any sort of comment on the article afterward. However it, and this topic, intrigued me, so here I am replying anyway. What I meant by it is that I agreed with what the article said about Cinderella, and the need for a character to make active decisions in order to qualify as "strong." Given that I don't see a problem with that portion of the article's logic, it becomes very believable that Katniss isn't the action heroine she has been touted to be.

If the article's writer really isn't familiar with the material like you say, obviously that changes things. As for you calling it garbage, sorry, but I don't know you any better than I do the article writer. You haven't expressed anything other than saying most of it is garbage, while the article (the portion of it that I read) expressed some thoughts that I agreed with. So yeah, it doesn't seem too unbelievable to think the article could be right about the rest. Until it is proven otherwise, of course.