Why would I consider it to be femenist?
A Deathwatch Guard Send a noteboard - 04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
People thinking that it is feminist is what saddens me. Both those that think it's feminist and dislike it, and those that think it's feminist and laud it. Because finding it to be feminist just because it has a female main character is admitting defeat. It means that when a movie has a male MC it's just a normal movie, but if it has a female character then it's feminist. That isn't the way it should be, -isms should be reserved for when something is truly radical. I'd call a movie feminist if it was bringing women up while putting men down, not if it's just featuring a female character. That to me is perfectly ordinary.
As for why I said I can imagine it to be true... Yes, I realize it is quite ridiculous to say that I don't know a thing about the movie or the books, and to make any sort of comment on the article afterward. However it, and this topic, intrigued me, so here I am replying anyway. What I meant by it is that I agreed with what the article said about Cinderella, and the need for a character to make active decisions in order to qualify as "strong." Given that I don't see a problem with that portion of the article's logic, it becomes very believable that Katniss isn't the action heroine she has been touted to be.
If the article's writer really isn't familiar with the material like you say, obviously that changes things. As for you calling it garbage, sorry, but I don't know you any better than I do the article writer. You haven't expressed anything other than saying most of it is garbage, while the article (the portion of it that I read) expressed some thoughts that I agreed with. So yeah, it doesn't seem too unbelievable to think the article could be right about the rest. Until it is proven otherwise, of course.
As for why I said I can imagine it to be true... Yes, I realize it is quite ridiculous to say that I don't know a thing about the movie or the books, and to make any sort of comment on the article afterward. However it, and this topic, intrigued me, so here I am replying anyway. What I meant by it is that I agreed with what the article said about Cinderella, and the need for a character to make active decisions in order to qualify as "strong." Given that I don't see a problem with that portion of the article's logic, it becomes very believable that Katniss isn't the action heroine she has been touted to be.
If the article's writer really isn't familiar with the material like you say, obviously that changes things. As for you calling it garbage, sorry, but I don't know you any better than I do the article writer. You haven't expressed anything other than saying most of it is garbage, while the article (the portion of it that I read) expressed some thoughts that I agreed with. So yeah, it doesn't seem too unbelievable to think the article could be right about the rest. Until it is proven otherwise, of course.
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review.
03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM
- 2187 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes"
03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM
- 971 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet
03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM
- 917 Views
It's not. That's what shallow idiots say about things where women have power or physical skills *NM*
04/04/2012 03:45:22 PM
- 814 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist.
03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM
- 883 Views
Where do I start?
03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM
- 892 Views
But that is exactly what feminist means "it could have been a boy just as well"
04/04/2012 01:42:43 PM
- 874 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying
03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM
- 797 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist?
03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM
- 902 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist?
04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM
- 786 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical.
04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM
- 865 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph
04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM
- 840 Views
To you "feminist" is a dirty word? To me, it means acceptable. Differences in definitions I think
04/04/2012 01:50:32 PM
- 793 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out
04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM
- 833 Views
Fair enough
04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM
- 872 Views
Stop using female as a noun!
04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM
- 798 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred
04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM
- 801 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM
- 793 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though
04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM
- 726 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds.
04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM
- 810 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over
04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM
- 847 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize.
04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM
- 762 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory
04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM
- 737 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM*
04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM
- 979 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly...
04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM
- 708 Views
That's not what I said.
04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM
- 822 Views
Which flies in the face of it's ordinary usage, which smacks of needless revisionism.
06/04/2012 09:42:15 AM
- 755 Views
Accusatory of what.i think you meant annoyed. So youre annoyed she was annoyed? Let's out this to re *NM*
09/04/2012 12:44:17 PM
- 825 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears)
06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM
- 793 Views
Nope. (edit)
06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM
- 790 Views
Re: Nope. (edit)
07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM
- 856 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse.
07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM
- 745 Views
Ok.
07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM
- 1024 Views
Let's try and whittle this down some so as to help you with the quotes.
07/04/2012 05:42:32 PM
- 744 Views
However he meant it, it was unpleasant to read. Just use "woman" instead. *NM*
05/04/2012 08:13:13 PM
- 692 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one.
05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM
- 798 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words
06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM
- 871 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind.
04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM
- 753 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM
- 771 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM
- 752 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing? *NM*
04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM
- 756 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that.
05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
- 825 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun!
05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM
- 703 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM
- 740 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that.
06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM
- 772 Views
Fascinating.
06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM
- 801 Views
Re: Fascinating.
07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM
- 777 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references.
07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM
- 777 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is?
07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM
- 837 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong.
07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM
- 712 Views
Sorry, no. Read better.
07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM
- 751 Views
Re: If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here.
09/04/2012 03:09:06 AM
- 766 Views
Nothing wrong with your use of female. You should ignore those crazy foreigners saying otherwise. *NM*
06/04/2012 02:49:41 PM
- 655 Views
I think I'll start saying males instead of men. If the males here don't mind? *NM*
09/04/2012 12:58:54 PM
- 744 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM
- 816 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive
04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM
- 765 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM*
03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM
- 727 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers*
04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM
- 800 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character
04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM
- 824 Views