Active Users:1103 Time:23/11/2024 01:02:25 AM
Re: Having read the comics in the 80s I've been waiting a long time for this to happen. A Deathwatch Guard Send a noteboard - 01/03/2012 07:05:00 PM
And I am super excited. I expect nothing less than the most fun I'll have at the movies this year.

Unrealistic? There is a God coming to Earth teaming up with a super soldier from WW2 and you call the fact they do unrealistic? ;)


See, my suspension of disbelief only works for certain things. For instance, when reading Harry Potter, I can easily accept that there is magic of all kinds, that regular people are muggles, and so forth. When watching a superhero movie, I can easily accept that I'm seeing a guy (or girl) with superhuman abilities, and that other such people exist for the superhero to battle and save the world from. That's totally fine. I can believe and accept that Thor, Iron Man, Loki, Captain America, Hulk, and whoever the others are all exist in the same universe at the same time. That's totally fine by me.

However, while I can accept their powers and all that comes with them as given, I continue to evaluate the "realism" of whatever I am watching or reading based on the character interactions, motivations, and other such things. And by those standards, which are unaffected by the presence of the supernatural, I find it unrealistic that a bunch of godlike good guys would ally and work together, first of all because they work alone and generally like it that way. Second, because their power levels are incompatible, so the strongest should be able to wipe the floor with the weakest with ease (unless I'm seriously missing something). And third, because no need for them to ally could exist. Kotagg pointed out below that the threat in this movie isn't just Loki but some other beings that he has allied with. While that would account for the need for all the superheroes to unite, it opens up a different can of worms... As in, why would those villains work together? Because the good guys at least are good guys, so they have some incentive to work together, being generally decent people and all. But the bad guys would be even less inclined to work together, make an even more incompetent team, and have even more dreadful teamwork.

Anyway... I'm losing my train of thought here. But yes, I can accept the existence of the superheroes, and it is the way they are banded together that I find unrealistic. *shrug*

Since when is fanservice a bad thing? You'd rather have them do the opposite of what we want? :P


lol. No, fanservice to some extent is a good thing. You won't see me complaining that female superheroes should wear less skimpy outfits or anything like that. :P

It's just that to me, the whole premise of the movie seems like fanservice. So fanservice that is small and in rather insignificant details is fine, but when it takes center stage, I disapprove of it.

You're right about the subplot, most probably but it'll be just fine.


Yeah. The whole movie will be fine. I'm not arguing that it'll be bad. In fact, I think it'll be very enjoyable, even for me if I see it. I'm just saying that for me, there is no sense of euphoria over this movie. It's just another blockbuster for me.
Reply to message
New Avengers trailer. - 01/03/2012 12:09:17 AM 930 Views
I don't usually use the dislike button on youtube... - 01/03/2012 12:58:07 AM 749 Views
It's not as if this movie franchise came up with the idea of teaming them up - 01/03/2012 08:06:36 AM 536 Views
Like I said, I never read the comics. But I'm totally fine with blaming them for the crossover - 01/03/2012 05:30:16 PM 501 Views
Having read the comics in the 80s I've been waiting a long time for this to happen. - 01/03/2012 06:20:10 PM 498 Views
Re: Having read the comics in the 80s I've been waiting a long time for this to happen. - 01/03/2012 07:05:00 PM 560 Views
Great point! - 01/03/2012 08:19:15 PM 686 Views
Pff. - 01/03/2012 09:27:14 PM 584 Views
I would think you & your kind would be least excited. - 02/03/2012 07:14:36 PM 483 Views
I am no purist by any means - 02/03/2012 09:30:41 PM 549 Views
Also, "Avengers" is a stupid name - 01/03/2012 05:16:16 PM 446 Views
Re: Also, "Avengers" is a stupid name - 02/03/2012 01:48:59 AM 518 Views
I'm just saying, what are they "Avenging?" - 02/03/2012 05:59:57 PM 507 Views
IT. SOUNDS. COOL. Stop asking questions. They HATE it when you ask questions about this stuff *NM* - 02/03/2012 07:06:38 PM 234 Views
WHO MAKES ALL THEIR COSTUMES *NM* - 04/03/2012 01:44:45 AM 221 Views
Reed Richards conceived of the unstable molecules fabric. - 06/03/2012 06:47:18 PM 534 Views
Edna Mole *NM* - 06/03/2012 09:56:34 PM 370 Views
Mode. Edna Mode. *NM* - 06/03/2012 11:57:59 PM 245 Views
Avenging the deaths of all those innocents incinerated by ray guns? *NM* - 03/03/2012 01:59:14 AM 255 Views
Huh...what a strange reaction. - 01/03/2012 06:20:17 PM 517 Views
The only thing you said that matters: - 03/03/2012 06:55:20 PM 513 Views
SCHWING! *NM* - 01/03/2012 03:24:58 AM 245 Views
YES! *NM* - 01/03/2012 08:46:05 AM 264 Views

Reply to Message