Active Users:1129 Time:22/11/2024 09:56:42 PM
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 29/02/2012 06:33:07 PM

Lucas tought Maul had become too instantly iconic, à la Vader. He went for a little more subdued villains on purpose. With Dooku he wanted an understated character closer to Tarkin, and Grievious as a cyborg was largely designed to be a transitional character (who was largely there to split Anakin from Obi-Wan). There are two main villains in the prequels: what goes on within Anakin, and Palpatine. Lucas had to be subtle with Palpatine, not to preserve "the surprise" as so many misjudged, but so Palpatine could credibly deceive the characters down to Yoda. In the third episode he steals the show. Lucas didn't want the Sith apprentices to undermine what happens in the third episode.


I think the problem I'm having with your posts is that you simultaneously talk about how it's for 7-10 year olds (which I acknowledge) and then extol subtle, delayed stuff like this that no 7-10 year old would appreciate.

And I'm sorry, but saying "Episodes 1 and 2 need to be subdued and kind of boring so the third movie really POPS" is just wrong, and bad. I don't know if that was Lucas's rationale, but I hope not.

Yes, the movies are part of two trilogies, which together make up one big story. But they're also self-contained in their own right- it's not like it's a TV series where the monster of the week is small potatoes compared to the Big Bad at the end of the season.


I'm just saying, if you create a character that instantly captures the audience's imagination, you shouldn't regret it.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
What if Episode 1 was good? - 28/02/2012 05:11:40 AM 1055 Views
thank you. this is awesome. *NM* - 28/02/2012 05:47:36 AM 312 Views
He has some good points - 28/02/2012 11:32:49 AM 563 Views
Which were which? *NM* - 28/02/2012 02:46:40 PM 226 Views
Talking people are annoying, especially when their first idea is stupid - 28/02/2012 01:51:50 PM 577 Views
Errrr you're not really addressing the video - 28/02/2012 02:55:46 PM 682 Views
Re: Errrr you're not really addressing the video - 28/02/2012 04:22:16 PM 723 Views
This. Very much. - 28/02/2012 06:54:00 PM 523 Views
Re: This. Very much. - 28/02/2012 11:27:02 PM 592 Views
Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 28/02/2012 07:42:43 PM 450 Views
Qui-Gon is the protagonist if you absolutely need one (though I don't know why you do) - 28/02/2012 10:59:23 PM 498 Views
Eh. It wasn't much of an "ensemble," either - 29/02/2012 06:23:23 PM 571 Views
You don't really need character development either - 29/02/2012 07:56:09 PM 562 Views
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 29/02/2012 12:16:51 AM 509 Views
Well said - 29/02/2012 08:39:36 AM 564 Views
Re: Well said - 02/03/2012 04:51:49 PM 542 Views
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 29/02/2012 06:33:07 PM 454 Views
Actually, I didn't get that far. The guy annoyed me so much I shut it off after the last point - 28/02/2012 06:45:43 PM 543 Views
Hah, I do! - 28/02/2012 07:55:52 PM 442 Views
Now I want Facebook posts for WoT - 29/02/2012 07:47:31 PM 614 Views
I just hate beets - 01/03/2012 05:18:41 PM 474 Views
Who here thinks they could make a better Episode I ? - 06/03/2012 06:43:58 PM 447 Views
Of course they'd all raise their hands - 07/03/2012 12:34:30 PM 488 Views
The point was that there's nothing special about this guy. - 08/03/2012 01:02:32 AM 527 Views

Reply to Message