Active Users:1102 Time:22/11/2024 10:00:59 PM
Which were which? *NM* beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 28/02/2012 02:46:40 PM
And is horribly mistaken a couple of times, too.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
What if Episode 1 was good? - 28/02/2012 05:11:40 AM 1055 Views
thank you. this is awesome. *NM* - 28/02/2012 05:47:36 AM 312 Views
He has some good points - 28/02/2012 11:32:49 AM 563 Views
Which were which? *NM* - 28/02/2012 02:46:40 PM 227 Views
Talking people are annoying, especially when their first idea is stupid - 28/02/2012 01:51:50 PM 577 Views
Errrr you're not really addressing the video - 28/02/2012 02:55:46 PM 682 Views
Re: Errrr you're not really addressing the video - 28/02/2012 04:22:16 PM 723 Views
This. Very much. - 28/02/2012 06:54:00 PM 523 Views
Re: This. Very much. - 28/02/2012 11:27:02 PM 592 Views
Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 28/02/2012 07:42:43 PM 450 Views
Qui-Gon is the protagonist if you absolutely need one (though I don't know why you do) - 28/02/2012 10:59:23 PM 498 Views
Eh. It wasn't much of an "ensemble," either - 29/02/2012 06:23:23 PM 571 Views
You don't really need character development either - 29/02/2012 07:56:09 PM 562 Views
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 29/02/2012 12:16:51 AM 509 Views
Well said - 29/02/2012 08:39:36 AM 564 Views
Re: Well said - 02/03/2012 04:51:49 PM 542 Views
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 29/02/2012 06:33:07 PM 454 Views
Actually, I didn't get that far. The guy annoyed me so much I shut it off after the last point - 28/02/2012 06:45:43 PM 544 Views
Hah, I do! - 28/02/2012 07:55:52 PM 442 Views
Now I want Facebook posts for WoT - 29/02/2012 07:47:31 PM 614 Views
I just hate beets - 01/03/2012 05:18:41 PM 474 Views
Who here thinks they could make a better Episode I ? - 06/03/2012 06:43:58 PM 447 Views
Of course they'd all raise their hands - 07/03/2012 12:34:30 PM 488 Views
The point was that there's nothing special about this guy. - 08/03/2012 01:02:32 AM 527 Views

Reply to Message