Active Users:654 Time:23/12/2024 12:49:18 PM
Yup. I'm going to watch it. Sold. *NM* FalonDeathwatchGuard Send a noteboard - 15/12/2011 03:30:45 PM
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/2vDm4.jpg" class="left" height="300" />
With big shoes to fill, after J.J. Abrams' third installment gave the franchise a fresh kick start, this sequel doesn't shy away from using the same formula: fast-paced and original action, exotic locations, Tom Cruise working his butt off in pretty much every scene, but also adding a lot more humor than the last film had.
Long story short: The recipe still works and delivers one of the greatest joyrides of the year.

The action scenes are excellent. Especially the entire Dubai sequence with the incredible money shot at the Burj Kalifa, the highest building in the world, is brilliant. So is the Kremlin hallway scene.
But the most pleasant surprise of the film is that it is not (only) the Tom Cruise show, even though his almost death-defying efforts to deliver as many of the stunts as he can is impressive. His comrades are just as awesome. Simon Pegg delivers the clumsy, lovable humor, Paula Patton turns out to be the strongest and most beautiful female of the series and Jeremy "I am currently in every cool film" Renner adds exhilarating adrenaline to the mix.

A fast, exciting, fun thrill ride that doesn't take itself too seriously but delivers the goods in every second and gives James Bond another hard run for his money. Director Brad Bird, specialist for animated films ("The Iron Giant", "The Incredibles", "Ratatouille" ) unexpectedly makes a strong case for being among the top action directors of the moment.
Impressive. One of the action highlights of recent years.

9 out of 10 magnetic Wall-E robots.
Reply to message
Mission: Impossible: Ghost Protocol - 15/12/2011 08:29:38 AM 834 Views
That's good to hear that it's a god movie...but isn't it the 4th installmen? *NM* - 15/12/2011 01:29:50 PM 275 Views
Yes - 15/12/2011 01:35:53 PM 670 Views
Ahhhhhhhhh - 16/12/2011 03:03:02 AM 516 Views
I didn't really like the trailer, but I'm going to see it anyway. - 15/12/2011 01:53:01 PM 688 Views
Re: I didn't really like the trailer, but I'm going to see it anyway. - 15/12/2011 03:33:19 PM 615 Views
Is it a spoiler? Becuase freaking Roger Ebert ruined it in his review - 15/12/2011 09:05:57 PM 511 Views
What exactly did he say? *NM* - 15/12/2011 11:26:03 PM 266 Views
Re: What exactly did he say? - 16/12/2011 12:43:15 AM 509 Views
Well, it's a mid-film spoiler - 16/12/2011 10:35:13 AM 529 Views
Yup. I'm going to watch it. Sold. *NM* - 15/12/2011 03:30:45 PM 265 Views
I want to see this, but I'm not sure if it'll be for $12 in Dec. or $2 when it hits the cheapie. *NM* - 15/12/2011 05:29:15 PM 258 Views
What about matinee price? *NM* - 16/12/2011 02:26:18 AM 248 Views
That's still $8.50... I hate Regal Cinemas. *NM* - 16/12/2011 02:10:19 PM 247 Views
I, too, hate Regal Cinemas. I like AMC. ($6 matinee) *NM* - 16/12/2011 02:29:44 PM 256 Views
Is Top Cat wearing a fake nose in that poster? - 15/12/2011 06:26:26 PM 551 Views
I watched it today. - 18/12/2011 06:54:11 AM 536 Views

Reply to Message