Active Users:1096 Time:01/11/2024 12:55:56 AM
I actually thought that was one of the weakest Moffat-ised episodes Stephen Send a noteboard - 05/09/2011 02:16:09 AM
It felt clunky and I didn't have any emotional investment in it. With about ten minutes to go I said to my brother that I thought it was going to be a double parter because i felt there was so little development and movement of plot in the opening half hour of so. The ending felt like something of a cop out, basically the entire thing can be summed up as "parents should look after their children better/more". So very tv movie of the week.
"I mean, if everyone had a soul, there would be no contrast by which we could appreciate it. For giving us this perspective, we thank you." - Nate
Reply to message
Doctor Who - Night Terrors - 04/09/2011 09:20:40 PM 568 Views
I actually thought that was one of the weakest Moffat-ised episodes - 05/09/2011 02:16:09 AM 338 Views
The beginning was quite slow. - 05/09/2011 03:24:00 AM 295 Views
My estimation. - 05/09/2011 05:04:57 AM 329 Views
My rankings would be pretty similar - 05/09/2011 04:00:14 PM 363 Views
I'm sorry - 05/09/2011 06:24:59 PM 334 Views
Those episodes do not exist! *NM* - 05/09/2011 01:53:51 PM 160 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 05/09/2011 03:43:58 PM 143 Views
I liked it, but I wouldn't say it was the best. - 05/09/2011 03:19:52 AM 522 Views
I agree with pretty much everything you said. - 05/09/2011 04:51:54 AM 295 Views
I thought it was rather average. - 05/09/2011 04:49:09 AM 282 Views
I thought it was okay. - 05/09/2011 07:44:51 AM 314 Views
Easily the best episode since Impossible Astronaut - 05/09/2011 11:20:11 AM 324 Views
Interestingly, the break seems to have worked ratings wise - 05/09/2011 06:25:59 PM 323 Views
It's also moved to a later timeslot, which may have helped *NM* - 06/09/2011 03:32:50 PM 154 Views

Reply to Message