And didn't his sacrifice somehow make it easier to kill the snake or something? I think I remember his death having more meaning the book, if I am not mistaken.
Haven't seen the movie yet, but Snape sacrifices himself in the book to convince Voldemort that by killing him he's removing the last obstacle to the power of the elder wand, and will thus be invincible. That's why Voldemort no longer felt it necessary to protect the Nagini-horcrux at that point, his crucial mistake. Snape gave up his life (instead for instance of half-lying to him that he didn't disarm Dumbledore but doesn't know who did etc.) so Voldermort would throw caution to the wind, thus buying perhaps the only chance for Harry to destroy the then overprotected Nagini and face a Voldemort unaware he isn't invincible.
I have read the books several times and never once did I get the feeling that Snape was sacrificing himself. Just think about it logically for a second. Snape was practically begging Voldemort to let him go look for Harry because he needed to tell Harry everything. HE HAD NO IDEA HARRY WAS THERE WATCHING WHEN HE DIED! So, no, Snape did not sacrifice himself. It was really a stroke of luck that Harry was there when he died (and also a plot contrivance).
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part Two
13/07/2011 11:17:42 PM
- 2874 Views
I'm really, really looking forward to seeing this
14/07/2011 01:43:17 AM
- 941 Views
Thinking about the film I found only two things to complain about *major spoiler*
15/07/2011 03:17:29 PM
- 1024 Views
Re: Thinking about the film I found only two things to complain about *major spoiler*
15/07/2011 04:35:07 PM
- 980 Views
Really??
15/07/2011 05:26:25 PM
- 964 Views
No. Dom needs to re-read me thinks. *NM*
15/07/2011 08:15:11 PM
- 541 Views
Re: No. Dom needs to re-read me thinks.
15/07/2011 08:32:44 PM
- 992 Views
Re: Thinking about the film I found only two things to complain about *major spoiler*
15/07/2011 08:19:47 PM
- 985 Views
I did not like the last 40 minutes or so of the film. I expected so much more from ... *SPOILERS*
16/07/2011 02:49:50 AM
- 1013 Views
I didn't really like it at first so I went to see it again today and walked out very satisfied. *NM*
16/07/2011 09:37:22 AM
- 531 Views
It's a great movie but...
16/07/2011 04:31:21 PM
- 1064 Views
Re: It's a great movie but...
16/07/2011 05:24:43 PM
- 1138 Views
That change had to be made, just like Frodo/Gollum/Mount Doom.....
16/07/2011 05:51:39 PM
- 1074 Views
You know, I kind of like that better than what happened in the book.
16/07/2011 10:27:47 PM
- 963 Views
Very much enjoyed
19/07/2011 01:00:22 AM
- 1219 Views
I certainly think you're in the majority, re: 7.1 being easily the best movie in the series. *NM*
20/07/2011 11:35:13 PM
- 531 Views
Predictably disappointing, sad to say.
20/07/2011 11:31:38 PM
- 942 Views
Never read any of the books, but
30/07/2011 09:35:03 PM
- 1029 Views
The books are more coherent, more humourous, and more complex, to sum it up.
30/07/2011 11:00:29 PM
- 952 Views
What? Goblet of Fire was my favorite by far until Deathly Hallows 1 came out. *NM*
01/08/2011 07:05:00 PM
- 533 Views
Feel like taking a survey about Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part Two.
03/08/2011 09:01:45 AM
- 1088 Views