Active Users:772 Time:22/11/2024 06:21:22 AM
In some places it's exactly that Brian Send a noteboard - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM
If a speed limit sign is obscured by a bush and I'm unable to see it that makes me ignorant of the law. You can't get a traffic ticket for that. I've seen it successfully fought.

I think a better example would be an obscure traffic law rather than the speed limit. For example if you turn over an "imaginary island" you can be ticketed. There's nothing to prevent you from driving over one, and many people wouldn't have the foggiest as to what an imaginary island is, but in spite of this you can be ticketed for driving over one.

I got a ticket for doing that once, and tried the I don't know what that is, so how could I be expected to follow a law whose existence I had absolutely no knowledge of? The judge gave the exact same response Stephen did: "Ignorance of the law is not a valid defense."


Is it one of those spots at an intersection outlined with thick white stripes and has white stripes pointed diagonally through it, that's what's coming to my mind.

In others it's simply a spot where the yellow lines separate and there is a section of road between them. Nothing painted through it or anything, and it can actually look a lot like a simple turn lane. The one you're describing seems like common sense that you couldn't drive on, the other sort.....maybe it is common knowledge, maybe not, I certainly didn't know you couldn't drive on them at the time.
Reply to message
Why is downloading "illegally" really illegal? - 19/01/2011 03:30:57 PM 1355 Views
Hmmm - 19/01/2011 05:00:16 PM 998 Views
I think - 19/01/2011 05:11:56 PM 922 Views
you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 05:21:06 PM 1010 Views
Re: you can't legally record and distribute TV shows - 19/01/2011 09:52:48 PM 1098 Views
Many shows (especially sports) forbid the duplication of said show in a statement or the credits. - 20/01/2011 03:22:10 AM 960 Views
I haven't been able to read the credits for TV shows in years. - 20/01/2011 03:51:40 AM 825 Views
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defence *NM* - 21/01/2011 01:21:25 PM 441 Views
How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 02:08:13 PM 913 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:09:19 PM 972 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 21/01/2011 09:19:46 PM 830 Views
Re: How do you figure that? - 22/01/2011 08:33:04 PM 1334 Views
What is an imaginary island? - 23/01/2011 04:47:40 AM 961 Views
In some places it's exactly that - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM 1194 Views
A lot of it's volume. - 19/01/2011 05:32:03 PM 888 Views
Your argument lacks merit. - 19/01/2011 05:50:11 PM 906 Views
Agreed. - 19/01/2011 06:01:13 PM 798 Views
Both terms lack accuracy in this case really. - 19/01/2011 06:37:29 PM 1030 Views
That's what I mean right there. - 19/01/2011 06:48:38 PM 980 Views
The punishable crime is - 21/01/2011 01:57:54 PM 976 Views
Re: Your argument lacks merit. - 20/01/2011 03:40:20 PM 852 Views
In my opinion - 19/01/2011 09:22:29 PM 929 Views
The battle is over, the internet won - 19/01/2011 10:12:50 PM 901 Views
We need to distinguish between a crime and a tort. - 19/01/2011 10:17:30 PM 1010 Views
Very interesting. - 19/01/2011 10:28:35 PM 1036 Views
Another scrabble word for you is "delict". That's what we call tort in Scotland. - 19/01/2011 10:37:08 PM 930 Views
I saw. - 19/01/2011 10:41:27 PM 831 Views
It won't get you very many points. - 19/01/2011 10:37:26 PM 801 Views
I would set me up for tortellini. - 19/01/2011 10:40:45 PM 826 Views
Also in most circumstances you could use "trot" instead. *NM* - 19/01/2011 10:42:26 PM 504 Views
Very nice legal overview, also I like Scotland's approach a lot - 19/01/2011 11:21:47 PM 854 Views
Unfortunately, damages can result in thousands of dollars for one song - 22/01/2011 08:19:40 PM 792 Views

Reply to Message