Active Users:618 Time:22/12/2024 03:45:36 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Very interesting. j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 19/01/2011 10:28:35 PM
There are certain "wrongful" acts that are crimes, i.e. if you do them the police can come after you and you can be prosecuted by the state. There are others which are torts, such as breaching a contract, trespassing on somebody's land, or causing somebody injury due to negligence (as opposed to on purpose or recklessly). Here, the state does not get involved except to provide a forum for resolving the dispute. You cannot be arrested or prosecuted for committing a tort, but the person harmed can take you to court, usually for an award of damages (i.e. monetary compensation) and/or an injunction (a court order not to do something). Tort is a private law area while crime is a public law area.

(Of course, many things are both crimes and torts, such as assault. If you do this you can be prosecuted and sued. But these will be separate cases, brought by different parties, and with different standards of proof.)

Copyright infringement is principally a tort, which means the production company can sue you for any loss they believe they have suffered as a result of your violations. There may be circumstances in which it is also a crime, but this is probably only the case (a) in a few countries, and (b) if you're making lots of money from it.

If you download the odd movie, the police will not come knocking on your door. A production company is also very unlikely to sue you unless you are a big-time distributor of files.

In the law I'm studying (Scots), pure information cannot be stolen, because the definition of theft involves (a) physical property, and (b) intentionally depriving the owner of its use. If you steal a DVD from a shop, you are taking something physical away from its owner, who then cannot use it. Neither of these is the case if you download a video file of the film. So the annoying adverts equating downloading with theft are simply wrong. I can't speak for other countries, but I bet that at least one of these requirements for theft applies pretty much everywhere, which would preclude unauthorised downloading from being theft.


I didn't even know that tort was a word. Now I can use it in my next game of Scrabble if I get those tiles. Thanks.
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Why is downloading "illegally" really illegal? j-whitt987 - 19/01/2011 03:30:57 PM 1370 Views
Hmmm Dark Knight - 19/01/2011 05:00:16 PM 1013 Views
I think Camilla - 19/01/2011 05:11:56 PM 937 Views
you can't legally record and distribute TV shows random thoughts - 19/01/2011 05:21:06 PM 1021 Views
Re: you can't legally record and distribute TV shows j-whitt987 - 19/01/2011 09:52:48 PM 1111 Views
Many shows (especially sports) forbid the duplication of said show in a statement or the credits. everynametaken - 20/01/2011 03:22:10 AM 973 Views
I haven't been able to read the credits for TV shows in years. j-whitt987 - 20/01/2011 03:51:40 AM 837 Views
Ignorance of the law is not a valid defence *NM* Stephen - 21/01/2011 01:21:25 PM 444 Views
How do you figure that? j-whitt987 - 21/01/2011 02:08:13 PM 923 Views
Re: How do you figure that? Bergioyn - 21/01/2011 09:09:19 PM 986 Views
Re: How do you figure that? j-whitt987 - 21/01/2011 09:19:46 PM 846 Views
Re: How do you figure that? Brian - 22/01/2011 08:33:04 PM 1347 Views
What is an imaginary island? The_Muted_Grimaud - 23/01/2011 04:47:40 AM 975 Views
In some places it's exactly that Brian - 23/01/2011 07:35:32 AM 1206 Views
A lot of it's volume. Palatine - 19/01/2011 05:32:03 PM 904 Views
Your argument lacks merit. jh - 19/01/2011 05:50:11 PM 920 Views
Agreed. Camilla - 19/01/2011 06:01:13 PM 817 Views
Both terms lack accuracy in this case really. Jacob - 19/01/2011 06:37:29 PM 1042 Views
That's what I mean right there. j-whitt987 - 19/01/2011 06:48:38 PM 993 Views
The punishable crime is Jacob - 21/01/2011 01:57:54 PM 985 Views
Re: Your argument lacks merit. Palatine - 20/01/2011 03:40:20 PM 870 Views
In my opinion Bergioyn - 19/01/2011 09:22:29 PM 943 Views
The battle is over, the internet won ironclad - 19/01/2011 10:12:50 PM 914 Views
We need to distinguish between a crime and a tort. Tim - 19/01/2011 10:17:30 PM 1023 Views
Very interesting. j-whitt987 - 19/01/2011 10:28:35 PM 1054 Views
Another scrabble word for you is "delict". That's what we call tort in Scotland. Tim - 19/01/2011 10:37:08 PM 945 Views
I saw. j-whitt987 - 19/01/2011 10:41:27 PM 845 Views
It won't get you very many points. Rebekah - 19/01/2011 10:37:26 PM 816 Views
I would set me up for tortellini. j-whitt987 - 19/01/2011 10:40:45 PM 839 Views
Also in most circumstances you could use "trot" instead. *NM* Tim - 19/01/2011 10:42:26 PM 512 Views
Very nice legal overview, also I like Scotland's approach a lot newyorkersedai - 19/01/2011 11:21:47 PM 867 Views
The case that decided information can't be stolen dates from 1987. Tim - 20/01/2011 09:35:31 AM 1633 Views
Unfortunately, damages can result in thousands of dollars for one song soilent brad - 22/01/2011 08:19:40 PM 804 Views
Here's the US answer on the VCR thing, and how it relates to today's copyright problems newyorkersedai - 19/01/2011 11:35:31 PM 972 Views
Re: Here's the US answer on the VCR thing, and how it relates to today's copyright problems *NM* newyorkersedai - 19/01/2011 11:37:56 PM 426 Views
Re: Here's the US answer on the VCR thing, and how it relates to today's copyright problems j-whitt987 - 20/01/2011 12:49:55 AM 1197 Views
I look at it both ways, like crossing the street newyorkersedai - 20/01/2011 05:37:30 AM 1039 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes