Re: Have you let your horse at the special mushroom patch again?
j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 22/12/2010 03:23:52 PM
1) I'm not saying you haven't, but have you ever watched standard definition television on a big display? 60 inches or so? It looks like crap. The resolution you need completely depends on what screen size you have, and how close to it you're sitting. On small tvs, you cannot physically tell the difference between SD and HD. Get something a little bigger, and the difference is marginal. Those who have really big setups, though, can see a pretty huge picture difference. HD absolutely is wasted on some people/setups, and the marketing hype surrounding it is absurd, but the "technology" (if you can call it that) is not meaningless. If you want something to look good on a big display, you need a higher resolution, and that's pretty much the end of it.
So basically what I said last night on another board is correct: "This HD crap is pretty much just good if you want a home theater system that you can watch from 100 yards off. Bigger is better, and this is all designed for the bigger."
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
HD. What's the deal?
20/12/2010 06:27:40 PM
- 1363 Views
I used to work at a cable company. A few things:
20/12/2010 06:53:15 PM
- 865 Views
Re: I used to work at a cable company. A few things:
20/12/2010 07:42:11 PM
- 957 Views
Re: Filling the entire screen
20/12/2010 09:59:35 PM
- 851 Views
If the picture isn't filling the screen, then it's not HD
21/12/2010 04:06:27 AM
- 923 Views
Time for a new eye glasses exam *NM*
20/12/2010 08:01:29 PM
- 424 Views
Re: Time for a new eye glasses exam
20/12/2010 08:22:21 PM
- 859 Views
Well damn...
20/12/2010 09:33:58 PM
- 751 Views
I'm glad you like it better, but everything I've read says that's incorrect.
21/12/2010 07:06:26 PM
- 707 Views
If you have to ask....
20/12/2010 09:36:01 PM
- 849 Views
I can see the wrinkles and nose hairs much more clearly. I am not necessarily keen on HD. TMI. *NM*
21/12/2010 12:43:59 AM
- 391 Views
Re: I can see the wrinkles and nose hairs much more clearly. I am not necessarily keen on HD. TMI.
21/12/2010 11:10:29 AM
- 689 Views
The deal is... you've gone crazy!
21/12/2010 04:45:33 AM
- 1131 Views
The only Blu-Ray I've seen is those in the stores comparing that to DVD.
21/12/2010 04:48:04 AM
- 846 Views
No one seems to have asked you this yet.
21/12/2010 05:56:55 PM
- 941 Views
Since everyone else seems to think you're weird or offbase...
21/12/2010 11:35:42 PM
- 814 Views
There's nothing wrong with not caring, only with not being able to tell.
22/12/2010 02:31:24 PM
- 702 Views
I'm with you, dude.
22/12/2010 07:12:24 AM
- 687 Views
Blu-ray looks fantastic on the right set, but I wouldn't go crazy over subscription media. *NM*
22/12/2010 02:20:16 PM
- 409 Views
Have you let your horse at the special mushroom patch again?
22/12/2010 02:40:21 PM
- 817 Views
Re: Have you let your horse at the special mushroom patch again?
22/12/2010 03:23:52 PM
- 810 Views
Damn!
22/12/2010 03:16:39 PM
- 706 Views
If you really want to see the difference, watch HD only for 1 month then switch back! Like wine...
23/12/2010 11:34:13 PM
- 682 Views
Something's wrong witg your settings, or you have a perception problem....
26/12/2010 08:36:07 PM
- 892 Views
So... My conclusions from this discussion.
28/12/2010 03:03:13 PM
- 778 Views
I've seen people with the exact same problem as you before
30/12/2010 12:25:00 AM
- 700 Views
So I'm an idiot for not believing in the all mighty power of the HDTV?
30/12/2010 12:31:44 AM
- 791 Views
No...
30/12/2010 02:05:18 PM
- 729 Views
I fail to see how calling him names contributes to this discussion. *NM*
03/01/2011 11:11:35 AM
- 399 Views
Re: I fail to see how calling him names contributes to this discussion.
04/01/2011 10:27:43 AM
- 733 Views
Re: I fail to see how calling him names contributes to this discussion.
06/01/2011 08:28:25 AM
- 764 Views