Active Users:1143 Time:22/11/2024 09:55:21 PM
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM
You didn't accidentally try the pilot, did you? Because that is atrocious. But Babylon 5 is also one of those shows which grows into itself. They are all a little stiff in the beginning, but it gets better.


Lol. It wasn't an accident. The look made me think of Beast Wars. I would think a full hour sci-fi show should have a better look than a thirty minute kid's show.

It lasted two seasons!


They were really short seasons though weren't they? Thirteen episodes each like The Sarah Connor Chronicles?

They are not science fiction. Both are ... I suppose you could call them detective shows with humour, but it does not cover it. Nathan Fillion from Firefly is the main character in Castle. The other one is about a con artist who helps the FBI.

The reason why I suggested them is that you listed House.


So you listed them because of the humor? Or because someone on each show is a douche in a funny way like Greg House?
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Is there a website where...? - 13/12/2010 04:18:51 PM 717 Views
Er... right here? - 13/12/2010 04:26:54 PM 503 Views
Re: Er... right here? *final edit?* - 13/12/2010 04:48:26 PM 468 Views
Here's some to look into - 13/12/2010 06:39:42 PM 614 Views
Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 06:50:11 PM 542 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:30:13 PM 603 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:24:52 PM 458 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:50:36 PM 489 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:05:04 PM 500 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:10:00 PM 558 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:13:33 PM 578 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:23:15 PM 557 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:31:04 PM 474 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:38:55 PM 424 Views
Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:45:57 PM 454 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:51:21 PM 442 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:56:32 PM 570 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM 470 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:13:48 PM 510 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:19:24 PM 483 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:25:02 PM 475 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:30:23 PM 538 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:35:43 PM 546 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:52:19 PM 579 Views
Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:13:22 PM 462 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:16:21 PM 592 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 14/12/2010 12:47:12 AM 592 Views
Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 09:21:15 PM 599 Views
Re: Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 10:37:37 PM 566 Views
We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 10:48:58 PM 487 Views
Re: We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 11:02:19 PM 488 Views
FWIW, Angel is a much better character on his own show than he was on Buffy. *NM* - 13/12/2010 11:17:50 PM 502 Views
I never liked him because he was a vampire sleeping with the Slayer. - 13/12/2010 11:52:21 PM 464 Views
Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 12:49:49 AM 420 Views
Re: Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 03:58:09 AM 467 Views
SUPERNATURAL - 21/12/2010 01:48:36 AM 501 Views
seconded, the villains are actually quite memorable. *NM* - 21/12/2010 06:39:35 AM 210 Views
Azazael FTW! *NM* - 22/12/2010 06:09:59 PM 215 Views
Lucy and Crowley too, IMO. *NM* - 22/12/2010 07:17:46 PM 204 Views
Damn right *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:51:56 PM 226 Views
Netflix tries to do this - 13/12/2010 08:43:02 PM 432 Views
I don't use Netfix. - 13/12/2010 08:47:27 PM 477 Views
it is worth it just for the watch instantly shows - 22/12/2010 06:18:29 PM 472 Views

Reply to Message