I'm thinking you'd be really, really, really confused. It might be a bit like surrealist art.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 06:04:37 PM
At least if this movie is anything like the previous ones - Ghav's review does suggest this is more focused and coherent, and so perhaps it's not as necessary here to have read the books.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One (spoiler-free)
- 15/11/2010 07:05:18 PM
1842 Views
Free?
- 15/11/2010 07:37:31 PM
734 Views
I figure it's fair. I mean, the universe has to make up for you being you sometimes, right? 
- 15/11/2010 10:28:46 PM
824 Views
- 15/11/2010 10:28:46 PM
824 Views
Sorry, I can't hear you over everyone in the theater talking before the film. 
- 15/11/2010 11:47:11 PM
786 Views
- 15/11/2010 11:47:11 PM
786 Views
...If my friends and I can get a seat. Holy crap is this line long. *NM*
- 15/11/2010 11:18:02 PM
438 Views
*NM*
*NM*
Hah, well, that subtext is probably a good thing (spoilers)
- 16/11/2010 02:24:13 PM
924 Views
Yeah, but unfortunately it just comes off as being really out of nowhere.
- 16/11/2010 05:29:26 PM
772 Views
I am sooooo over HP. I'll probably wait a week for the fan-storm to blow over, or wait 'till dvd.
- 16/11/2010 03:43:27 PM
889 Views
NSSP: So?
- 16/11/2010 05:50:53 PM
668 Views
I'm thinking you'd be really, really, really confused. It might be a bit like surrealist art.
- 16/11/2010 06:04:37 PM
826 Views
But the 7th book relies so heavily on the 6th, it would be pretty impossible.
- 16/11/2010 08:29:28 PM
928 Views
You ought to read or watch them just for their cultural relevance.
- 16/11/2010 08:30:45 PM
848 Views
- 16/11/2010 08:30:45 PM
848 Views
I see the , but serioiusly, I don't think I need to.
- 17/11/2010 05:53:27 PM
784 Views
, but serioiusly, I don't think I need to.
- 17/11/2010 05:53:27 PM
784 Views
It's about as influential as Star Wars, which I guess depends on how influential you think SW is.
- 17/11/2010 09:23:55 PM
791 Views
That seems a bit early to say - wait till twenty years have passed, then check again. *NM*
- 18/11/2010 03:46:24 PM
443 Views
Fair enough, but I think we're already seeing its influence on children's literature. *NM*
- 19/11/2010 08:41:51 PM
478 Views
Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One (spoiler-free)
- 18/11/2010 11:02:29 AM
823 Views
didn't like 3/5 for me
- 21/11/2010 12:57:59 AM
897 Views
I'm glad it's 2 films, but the total run time could be 4 hours instead of 5 hours *NM*
- 21/11/2010 07:15:54 AM
424 Views
i guess even with severe editing one film would have ran for 4 hours
- 22/11/2010 11:53:13 AM
773 Views
the dance was one of the best scenes in the film, imo. *NM*
- 22/11/2010 07:09:26 PM
417 Views
Yeah, I really liked it.
- 22/11/2010 08:10:08 PM
735 Views
Re: Yeah, I really liked it.
- 23/11/2010 10:20:26 PM
719 Views
yes, but we can't have CHARACTERIZATION!!!
- 24/11/2010 06:55:39 AM
680 Views
it wasn't characterisation, it was horribly awkward and clumsily crowbarred in
- 25/11/2010 01:15:20 AM
639 Views
*shrug* I liked the scene. It was something lighthearted in the middle of a lot of bleakness
- 25/11/2010 01:43:14 AM
695 Views
I was against the idea of splitting it when that was first announced
- 29/11/2010 03:02:27 PM
750 Views
Wow. Awesome. Makes it all the sadder how bad the others were, but oh well.
- 26/11/2010 10:48:35 PM
799 Views
A few more detailed thoughts about why this film blows its predecessors out of the water
- 29/11/2010 02:46:23 PM
889 Views
One scene they could have made scarier (spoilers)
- 30/11/2010 05:16:42 PM
814 Views
oh I dunno...
- 01/12/2010 08:25:20 AM
801 Views
I for one cannot WAIT for the Bellatrix vs Molly Weasley showdown. Gonna be epic! Best scene in book *NM*
- 05/12/2010 07:41:53 AM
420 Views